There's no crying in Baseball!
Views
814
Comments
11

On the Throw Down site, an older member began a TD with stating the MLB should enact some type of rule banding neck or facial tatoos.

Of course, he was immediately hounded for trying to infringe upon the right of one's self expression.

I have some definite thoughts on this and I wish to put it out there to the world to see how far away I am from the rest of the community.

Is this asking too much? Have we became so politically correct that we now accept or have to accept Professional athletes appearances anyway they wish to appear in public or on the courts or fields?

The NBA, and before you crucify me I am not saying they are but only appear; looks like a band of street thugs playing ball. I know that tatoos have been around the NBA for a long time now; along with the hair dye, nose rings and other displays of personality windows.

And it was at first just the "odd ball" (Rodman) or two that everyone just said, "oh that's just Dennis" and laughed it off. But even then it seemed like they laughed it off because they did not want to deal with the consequences of doing anything about it.

And that is the problem. Tatoos for the most part is a permanent thing. How does an Owner of a professional team sit at a bargaining table and sign a muti-million dollar contract with an athlete dressed to the hilt in business suit, clean cut hair, cleanly shaven face, no piercings or other displays of "self expression"; and first game of the season sees him on the floor with a big old "**** You" tatoo on his face? It's coming.

How do I know this? Because everyone and their damn brother is scared of the lawsuit that would follow if they did something about it.

When do we as a society have a say in what is offensive and what is not offensive? When it comes to the Pros, in all sports not just the NBA, having tatoos, piercings or other "self expression" displays that we as adults DO NOT want our kids to follow what do we do?

Where does it stop? An immediate fix could be League imposing some type of ban on tatoos displayed while in uniform but does that really answer the mail? That is probably impossible with the NBA at this point.

I don't know what the answer is. I am not smart enough to figure out a suitable answer that would fit everyone's wishes. I am smart enough to know that no one can come up with a viable solution that appeases everyone, however that does not mean we should not at the very least try to find a common ground of morality that could save our youth.

I for one do not want to see your granddaugther in fives years with a **** tatooed to her left cheek. This IS the type of thing we are going to start seeing however if we dont' have some type of controls in place to stop them.

As a veteran I have heard of people burning the American flag in protest as a means of self expression and I always knew that if I were present and that took place that I would use "my self expression" and wrap that burning flag around the head of the one that lit it on fire.

Maybe the tatoo thing is just a generation fad like mini-skirts and bell bottom pants. Realizing that tatoos are far more permanent makes it hard to believe so.

Any thoughts? 

 

November 3, 2011  12:43 PM ET

Absolutely. No business should be precluded from putting reasonable limits on its employees appearance (and athletes are employees), especially if those appearances drive away customers.
I am not talking about immutable traits such as hair color, skin color, or deformities. However, tattoos, piercings and attire are things within the control of the employee. Therefore a league or team owner should be able to tell their employees, you must conform to ____ because that is what sells tickets.

November 3, 2011  01:20 PM ET

As a professional, I have to admit that it would make a difference in the hiring process.

Personally, tattoos have never been an interest to me. I've seen way too many sag in later years and it's not pretty!

Comment #3 has been removed
November 3, 2011  03:59 PM ET

Racist.

November 3, 2011  05:04 PM ET
QUOTE(#4):

Racist.

who? Me?

November 3, 2011  05:09 PM ET

Tattoos are now permitted on the hands and back of the neck if they are not ???extremist, indecent, sexist or racist.??? Army Regulation 670-1, which was modified via a message released Jan. 25, also now specifies: ???Any tattoo or brand anywhere on the head or face is prohibited except for permanent make-up.???

For women, allowable make-up would be permanent eye-liner, eyebrows and makeup applied to fill in lips, officials said. They said permanent make-up should be conservative and complement the uniform and complexion in both style and color and will not be trendy.

The change was made because Army officials realized the number of potential recruits bearing skin art had grown enormously over the years.

About 30 percent of Americans between the ages of 25 and 34 have tattoos, according to a Scripps Howard News Service and Ohio University survey. For those under age 25, the number is about 28 percent. In all, the post-baby-boom generations are more than three times as likely as boomers to have tattoos.

November 3, 2011  05:13 PM ET

Nice blog. I'm inclined to agree with your line of thinking here.

November 3, 2011  05:13 PM ET

so why is it that even the military STILL recognizes facial tatoos as taboo and Unprofessional?

This might make me a conformist to normal regulations and morals but it certainly does NOT make me a racist. IF you viewed my blog as an attack on any race then you took what I said personal. And why is that?

November 3, 2011  05:15 PM ET

There are still managers in MLB that have Hair Cut policies for gripes sake, so exactly how is facial tatoos ok?

Comment #10 has been removed
 
November 4, 2011  09:31 AM ET
QUOTE(#10):

I think he was just being glib.

I hope so. I honestly did not mean to offend anyone or appear racist in any fashion.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Start Your Own Blog

Start Now

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Could Cavs trade entire draft for shot at Nerlens Noel?
    Views
    2581
    Comments
    551
  2. 2
    Dwyane Wade surprises teen at her prom
    Views
    3690
    Comments
    493
  3. 3
    Redskin fans buy RGIII's entire wedding registry
    Views
    6979
    Comments
    75
  4. 4
    Report: Ex-Miami coach says unreported SEC violations far worse
    Views
    10521
    Comments
    44
  5. 5
    Sharks GM: Raffi Torres suspended for 'clean hit'
    Views
    2525
    Comments
    42

SI.com

Swimsuit

SI Photos