Stay on Target!
Views
6775
Comments
1

I saw a TD that got me thinking again about the amount of fuel consumed by the racing industry (see it here: http://www.fannation.com/throwdowns/show/151879).

I know there are a lot of racing fans out there, and I'm not trying to disparage the "sport" in any way.  But those of us old enough to drive are all feeling the pinch at the pump, and inflated gas prices naturally lead me to consider the overall problem of fuel consumption. 

Let me be clear- I'm not suggesting that racing has a direct impact on fuel prices.  This is about use, not cost.  But I do want to throw some numbers around.

According to NASCAR, about 6,000 gallons of fuel are consumed during a typical race weekend- this includes qualifying, practice, and the race itself (source: http://www.azcentral.com/sports/speed/articles/0602nascargas-ON.html).  Estimates say that stock cars average roughly 5 miles per gallon overall, and significantly less at top speed.

The 2008 NASCAR schedule has 40 races (www.nascar.com), which means that based on the numbers above, roughly 240,000 gallons of fuel will be consumed during the season.

Let me put that in perspective for you:  My car averages about 30 mpg.  Pretty good, right?  With that amount of fuel, I could drive 12,000 a miles per year for SIX HUNDRED YEARS

To put it another way, let's say that you've got a bunch of drivers who all get 20mpg.  A typical number given that many of us drive SUVs and other large vehicles.  240,000 gallons of gas would yield a total of 4.8 million miles.  Given the annual mileage piled up by the average driver, that equates to a year's worth of driving for 400 people.

That's NASCAR Sprint Cup alone.  Add to that the various other racing leagues including Busch Series, Craftsman Truck Series, Formula 1, Indy Car Series, funny cars, midgets, motocross, and countless other pro and semi-pro car, truck, and motorcycle racing organizations. 

Now I'll grant you that the vehicles used in these races vary greatly in their fuel efficiency, but the point is that with the vast amount of races of all types being run worldwide, it's immediately obvious that an unbelievably huge amount of fuel is being consumed by the industry as whole.  I couldn't even begin to calculate how many gallos of petroleum products are accounted for, but if a single NASCAR season equates to a quarter of a million gallons you call well imagine that we're talking million upon millions overall.

I don't consider myself to be a staunch environmentalist.  I should probably be more "green" on my own before I criticize others.  And I don't have anything against NASCAR or racing per se, though I'm not an avid fan either.  But I can't help but be more than a little annoyed over the amount of fossil fuels we're burning in our pursuit of entertainment.  Especially now, when it costs me $40 just to fill a Civic.

 

 
August 17, 2013  08:57 AM ET

The amount of fuel used by racecars on the track for "entertainment" pales in comparison to the fossil fuels burned by all the football fans driving their SUVs to just one weeks NFL games. If you are worried about use of natural resources burned for entertainment then we should ban football, baseball, basketball, hockey, concerts, etc.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Start Your Own Blog

Start Now

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Kerr 'absolutely expects' Knicks offer
    Views
    2914
    Comments
    1435
  2. 2
    No return timetable for Lightning MVP
    Views
    1648
    Comments
    219
  3. 3
    Yankees, Mets, Red Sox among Hanrahan hopefuls
    Views
    6330
    Comments
    172
  4. 4
    Smush Parker allegedly punches high schooler
    Views
    1214
    Comments
    132
  5. 5
    Tuukka Rask takes blame for Bruins' Game 1 loss
    Views
    1379
    Comments
    119

SI.com

SI Photos