After all of the heated rhetoric in the last few weeks between China and the West, after all of the torch relay protests and the pro-China protests, after Carrefour got picketed by Chinese consumers because of the perception that France was anti-China for what happened during the torch relay in Paris, after all the strong-arming and name-calling - I woke up this morning to the news that China has reached out to the Dalai Lama's representatives to set a time to hold face-to-face talks.
This is huge news. I don't care if they just sit at a Starbucks in central Beijing and talk - I don't care if all they do is swap favorite Han and Tibetan recipes - the fact that China is finally, finally willing to publicly meet with Tibetan representatives signals that the Chinese leadership gets it. The angry rhetoric about the Dalai Lama being a "splittist" wasn't going anywhere, and it was turning world opinion against China at the very time when China should want the support of the world so that the Games of the 29th Olympiad have a fighting chance of going off without a hitch. Not to mention that the future of the world hinges pretty seriously on China becoming a full-fledged member of the world community. Hopefully this is the first step in an improved relationship - whether it results in any long-term improvement in Tibet is of course something that won't be known for a long, long time.
I have to wonder whether Beijing would have taken such a significant step if they had not realized how much world opinion was turning against them hosting the Olympics. This is such a huge moment that I have to believe that China hosting the Games was a major factor in China being able to justify softening their stance vis-a-vis Tibet. Just a thought - one that I'll revisit in more depth later.
In shift, China offers to meet with Dalai Lama envoys (New York Times, 04-25-2008)
China to meet Dalai Lama aides among Tibet tension (Reuters via Yahoo Sports, 04-25-2008)
For more on this issue, including news of the previous meetings that have been held between representatives of the Dalai Lama and the Chinese government since 2002, check out this piece in the Financial Times.
Jarah Mariano
Hilary Rhoda
NFL Fans: Week 11
Sled Hockey
Comments (4) Add A Comment
Yeah, the Chinese leadership gets that if they meet with someone that they can get off the hook, nothing will be done, nothing will change except that non-chinese govs will have the opportunity to ignore Tibet etc by saying China has changed, which it has not.
Yeah China gets it, but you do not.
AllStarz
Total Comments (18993)
As I said, who knows what's actually going to happen when the two sides sit down - but the fact that China is making the gesture is significant. Of course it could just be window-dressing, but that's no reason not to be relieved that it's finally happening. My opinions about these issues, by the way, are shaped by over ten years of work in and around China. What is your opinion that I don't "get it" based on?
Mary Nicole Nazzaro
Total Comments (13)
Your staements and optimism...you might as well just give yourself the pen name China apologist. China has a longer history than the last 10 years, if you look at their practices you would have discounted just about every word you wrote. Optimism is nice, it is even nicer if there is a reason for it. Optimism without reason is just what the Chinese Gov wants, propoganda.
AllStarz
Total Comments (18993)
I disagree. The word "apologist" is being bandied about to just about every U.S.-based writer who has actual experience in China and who then brings that viewpoint to try to have a nuanced discussion about the issues. It's a word that is meant to demean and minimize the contributions of the person who sees China as more than what the masses in the west want to sell us. It's a pretty depressing situation to see just how quickly people in this country are judged when they say something other than the official party line about China.
By the way, have you considered the irony in your own comments? You want to discount my viewpoints because they're not the same as yours. Isn't that what you're so upset at the Chinese governemnt for allegedly doing - suppressing dissent?
Here's to more lively discussion on these issues in the future - hopefully without the name-calling next time around.
Mary Nicole Nazzaro
Total Comments (13)
Comment
Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.