The Fantasy Football Geek Blog
  • 11:14 AM ET  06.20
Views
449
Comments
1

If you found yourself in your league's championship matchup last season, there's a good chance you got there despite your running backs, rather than because of them. It was just one of those seasons where most owners found themselves banking on their receivers and quarterbacks rather than on their injury-prone or lackluster RBs. In short, it wasn't a good season for the vaunted "take RBs in rounds 1 and 2, always" drafting mantra.

Is it time to reevaluate the RB-RB approach? The subject has been broached by several bloggers and columnists this off-season. Here I'll provide a summary of their opinions, as well as my own take. Will we reach a consensus of sorts?

Read the rest of this story

 
June 20, 2008  12:43 PM ET

Great read, thanks. I always enjoy these columns.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Coming soon: Log in with your Facebook account, send comments and Throwdowns to Facebook and more.

Start Your Own Blog

Start Now

The Si.com Cover Hub Go to the Cover Hub

Stub Hub

The 2009 schedule has been released. Search for tickets!

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Chargers accuse McDaniels of trash talk
    Views
    26395
    Comments
    2809
  2. 2
    Source: Damon won't take pay cut
    Views
    51003
    Comments
    971
  3. 3
    Cowher to Bears or Texans?
    Views
    22053
    Comments
    527
  4. 4
    Yankees to cut down on spending
    Views
    1291
    Comments
    462
  5. 5
    Disrespected Ryan takes dig at Moss
    Views
    3577
    Comments
    309

Message Boards

  1. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    What happens if Bama and UT…
    Views
    470
    Replies
    36
  2. MMA > General MMA

    Arlovski's next fight -…
    Views
    364
    Replies
    15
  3. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    BCS Selection Walk Through
    Views
    290
    Replies
    21

Blogs

SI.com

Swimsuit

SI Photos