If you found yourself in your league's championship matchup last season, there's a good chance you got there despite your running backs, rather than because of them. It was just one of those seasons where most owners found themselves banking on their receivers and quarterbacks rather than on their injury-prone or lackluster RBs. In short, it wasn't a good season for the vaunted "take RBs in rounds 1 and 2, always" drafting mantra.
Is it time to reevaluate the RB-RB approach? The subject has been broached by several bloggers and columnists this off-season. Here I'll provide a summary of their opinions, as well as my own take. Will we reach a consensus of sorts?
Anne V
Chelsey Buhler
Tweets of the Week
Did You See That?
Comments (1) Add A Comment
Great read, thanks. I always enjoy these columns.
Tracy00214-Is back!
Total Comments (32396)
Comment
Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.