Moondizzle's Blog
  • 12:32 PM ET  06.26
Views
1313
Comments
10

For the life of me, I really can't understand why people feel the need to issue throwdowns and write blogs that predict future World Series champions and Super Bowl winners.

If you do a season preview and make predictions, thats great. If you process some mock drafts for the rest of us to take a look at - I appreciate it, as long as its a good, competent read.

But this blog is targeted specifically at throwdowns popping up all over Fan Nation that have little to do with argument rhetoric and much to do about inane, easy to win topics. What am I taking aim at specifically? Something that looks like this:

"The Giants will not Repeat as Super Bowl Champions."

Seems harmless at first glance, right? Well, its not. Its a recycled topic brought forth by people with nothing better to do than to jump on last year's winners simply out of team hatred. These throwdowns are issued specifically by fans of opposing NFC East franchises, and even others that lack a clue. The arguments, besides being sub-par, are laughably short and usually focus on the fact that the Giants got lucky.

Here is the problem with this topic: Teams rarely EVER repeat. The teams that repeat as champions are usually dynastical organizations that are put together perfectly. Teams with coaching & player continuity. One need not look any further than the Patriots franchises of this decade. Thats arguably a dynasty. You can argue a topic about the Patriots repeating or not repeating. It actually holds water.

But why, almost daily, do we have to look at someone's keyboard vomit taking aim at the Giants? They won the Super Bowl. Get over it. Everyone knows they were not the 'best' team in the NFL last year. Everyone knows they got hot at the right time. But they own a ring. They won it all. And the respect, which I as a fan show to all the other franchises that win year after year, is owed to them.

Maybe you're a hater. Maybe you're a fan of an opposing team whose own team isn't worth squat, and gets beat up year after year. I have one: A team whose QB rhymes with shmushnabb. The team shmushnabb plays for can't win. And you're angry because of it. Get over it. Its a new season.

My other issue here: The topic is laughably easy. You can get dozens of people to agree with you even if you scribble "HOT DOG" or "RUBBER BAND" in the argument section. You can get 100 blog views simply by mentioning the Giants, and then typing about a leper tied to a dead elephant in Botswana, and still have people comment that you're on target.

Teams don't generally repeat, while it is possible. But that doesn't mean you have free reign to jump all over last year's champs because you feel depressed about your own squad. Get a clue.

June 26, 2008  12:41 PM ET

The Giants just got lucky last year. THEY **** SUCK!!!!

Cowboys all the way

June 26, 2008  01:26 PM ET

I'll try your Hot Dog theory Moon.....

June 26, 2008  01:29 PM ET

Hey moon you are Right and this guy here is right Giant's do suck ****. And Cowboys will win it all this year.

June 26, 2008  01:30 PM ET

Right on Moon.

June 26, 2008  01:31 PM ET

Hey moon you are Right and this guy here is right Giant's do suck ****. And Cowboys will win it all this year.

wb2188 | 06/26/08, 01:29 PM
===============

Actually I'm glad you stopped by, slapshot. You were part of the driving force behind this blog.

June 26, 2008  02:38 PM ET

The Giants ARE a lot like a hot-dog eating leper tied to a Botswanian elephant with a rubber band. I'm glad you finally noticed.

June 26, 2008  03:17 PM ET

I know wb2188. The Giants are so bad they went to Dallas and beat the Cowboys, then went on to win the Super Bowl. They are so **** bad. The Cowboys though, they had as many playoff wins as the Dolphins did last season, so they are just nasty

June 26, 2008  03:35 PM ET

I don't like Hot Dogs. Vote right.


Wait... this isn't a throwdown?

Good blog Moon :-)

Comment has been removed
 
February 7, 2009  07:56 PM ET

I think this point was driven home most clearly when I was pointed to a TD which said (in paraphrase) "The Guppies will win the championship this year."

The TD was still alive but the championship had come and gone, and the Guppies were not part of it.

To me, "debatable" means a topic which will not have a resolution - at least in the immediate future.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Coming soon: Log in with your Facebook account, send comments and Throwdowns to Facebook and more.

Start Your Own Blog

Start Now

The Si.com Cover Hub Go to the Cover Hub

Stub Hub

The 2009 schedule has been released. Search for tickets!

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Agent: 'Extraordinary' interest in Bay
    Views
    3732
    Comments
    1887
  2. 2
    Vikings to consider L.A. move?
    Views
    54253
    Comments
    1867
  3. 3
    Mayo rebukes Bruschi's Belichick knock
    Views
    38655
    Comments
    240
  4. 4
    Can Iverson lure LeBron to Knicks?
    Views
    8935
    Comments
    174
  5. 5
    50 Cent's posse tussles with Marv Albert
    Views
    60562
    Comments
    126

Message Boards

  1. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    RIP, Stefanie Spielman
    Views
    288
    Replies
    14
  2. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    Are college football coaches…
    Views
    229
    Replies
    47
  3. NFL > Pittsburgh Steelers

    Big Ben accepts Blame for loss…
    Views
    170
    Replies
    37

Blogs

SI.com

Swimsuit

SI Photos