jayrpanlilio's Blog
  • 03:40 AM ET  09.04
Views
3148
Comments
9

I know the title of my post confused you. It confused me at first too but let me try to put some sense into it. If the lakers are so desperate to add a Defensive Presence at the SF position, How does Kobe Bryant at SF sound? Hmmm, what happens to Odom? That's where Ben Gordon comes in. People have been talking about the Lakers championship collapse and most of the blame directs to either Pau Gasol's softness and Lamar Odom's slump. Odom is LA's most valauble trading chip(actually Bynum is but you would have to pint a gun at Mitch Kupchak's head before he trades him). Odom is a star, he is not a superstar but he is a pretty descent NBA player. He can grab a ton of rebounds, he can penetrate and he can dribble like a PG BUT BUT BUT, with a healthy bynum a scorer like kobe and a veteran PG in Fisher Odom's abilities would be less needed. He improves the lakers in a lot of way's but his Mediocre D and "I could care less" personality pull's the team downwards instead of improving it. His good season and OK playoff's was overshadowed by the mediocre championship series against the celtics. he was outpowered and outplayed by Kendrick Perkins. Come on now. You are always remembered for the plays that count the most. Just look at AROD. I know it is not fair but that's just how it goes. WAIT WAIT WAIT, let's go exactly 2018.30 miles away to the Windy City where the bulls who where just a favorite to at least contend in the east or where viewed as some to be Championship Material where sucking more than any other Chicago Sports Franchise. The Bulls who where just in the playoffs a year ago whre making headlines, for sucking. So what does this have to do with the lakers? The Bulls made moves to bolster they're chances for the future by Signing Derrick Rose to be they're point guard for the future, Trading away they're migraine of a signing Ben Wallace and in the process acquiring the Cavs own disappointment in Larry Hughes and another forward in Drew Gooden, Signing another forward Luol Deng to a new contract and trusting a rookie Joakim Noah with the Center duties. Wait, something doesnt seem right. Oh yeah, what happenes to they're 2004 1st round pick, they're SG Ben Gordon. They offered hiom 50Mil for 5 years which he turned down hoping to make it big in his free agent year but it didn't turn out as planned. They're now offering him 6.5million for this year and a chance to be an unrestricted freeagent next year. In short they want at least a bargain. But Gordon is not biting. He shouldn't. Leading your team in scoring doesn't lead to an insulting contract at the end of the year. He's not in there plans, and the feeling is mutual. He played his last game in a bulls jersey but what jersey would he be wearing next? Wouldn't a Ben Gordon, wearing a no. 7 jersey but this time on Purple and gold be just oh so sweet and a Lamar Odom who could still play on a no. 7 jersey, but this time on a bulls jersey be nice too?

 And now the complicated part.

 

The Bulls are overloaded in the Forward position with the unproven Tyrus Thomas, Cedric Simmons?,Andres Nocioni,Drew Gooden and the newly signed Luol Deng. What would they do with Odom? Aqcuiring Odom would make Thomas, Simmons? and Gooden expandable and that would mean that the bulls can use those players to make a package in order to acquire a proven Center which is what they need. The East is loaded with strong big men and that is what the Bulls need. Odom can now leave up to his Scotty Pippen comparisons. They would at least get something instead of losing Gordon for nothing.

The Bulls Starting Lineup would be:

C-Joakim Noah/ or whoever they would acquire

PF-Lamar Odom

SF-Andres Nocioni

SG-Larry Hughes

PG-Derrick Rose /Kirk hinrich_unless Rose doesn't mature fast enough but I highly doubt it)

That would leave they're bench with Hinrich,Simmons?,Sefolosha,Nichols?,Gray?,and Gooden. Not bad. This "PROPOSED TEAM" should be enough to challenge the east or at least make a deep run in the playoffs.

 

Now for the Lakers:

 Pulling of a sign and trade for Gordon would make a lot of sense for the Lakers. I know a lot of you would disagree but this is my blog, my opinion, my say. The lakers could move Kobe Bryant to SF which wouldn't be that  much of an adjustment for him because he can score on anyone and he can guard the likes of lebron james and Carmelo Anthony. This improves they're D at the SF position and gain more offense and outside shooting in the process.(Not like they need it) The projected lineup would be:

C-Andrew Bynum

PF-Pau Gasol

SF-Kobe Bryant

SG-Ben Gordon

PG-Derek Fisher/Jordan Farmar

With they're bench being Trevor Ariza, Joe Crawford(R),Coby Karl,Chris Mihm, Dwayne Mitchell, Josh Powell, Vladimir Radmanovic, Sun Yue, Sasha Vujacic and Luke Walton. Not bad right? they're still a little weak behind bynum but the Zen master would figure that out.

 

If the teams can figure this out financially and they think that both clubs can benfit from a deal, I think that they both should pull this off. Bulls acquire a veteran star while the lakers can improve in one of there weakness internally while not really losing the offense and defense that they would be giving up.

 

TELL ME WHAT YOU GUYS THINK! YOUR COMMENTS EITHER GOOD OR BAD ARE DEEPLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU!

September 4, 2008  05:27 AM ET

OK - so you address D at the SF position by doing this, but you're just moving the problem to SG.

Doesn't seem to make much sense. I'd much rather see them get a stopper at the 2 or 3 even if the guy has limited offensive capabilities.

September 4, 2008  07:50 AM ET

Thank you for taking the time to read my post. 1st I think Kobe Bryant on SF will be a nice move for LA because this allows him to guard the other teams scorer while having an advantage on the person guarding him who probably would be a little slower . Ben Gordon is a pretty descent defender. He can pressure the PG while Fisher guards the SG or however way it would work for them. This is just a suggestion, I know that it is a longshot but I would love to see this deal. Especially that LO is an expiring contract which makes him twice as much expandable.

September 5, 2008  02:40 AM ET

I think that you are forgetting that Phil Jackson likes to play big guards. At 6' 3" Ben may not make the cut. Being an LA fan, I know the Clippers can use some scoring this season. He would need to work out a sign and trade.

September 5, 2008  03:25 PM ET

Point taken but The clippers would have pretty small guards in davis and gordon if they do make a deal.

September 6, 2008  12:42 PM ET

Ok blog, I might consider signing you to the bloggers nation.

September 6, 2008  06:59 PM ET

No. Kobe already expends too much energy on the defensive end to add people like Lebron and Carmelo to his assignment list. That's why everyone's talking about the defensive 3, so that person can take either the 2 or 3 on the opposing team and let Kobe take the weaker one to focus more on offense.

September 8, 2008  04:29 PM ET

Well i think that would be a dumb trade. the laker's dont need help at that position, unless ben gorden plans on taking a back seat to scoring and fucus only on D it wouldnt work. i rahter kept the softer odom at least we would have more fast break points with him. gordon like the 3 ball and we damn sure have enough 3 point shooter's. now if u want to trad vlad for gordon and have him come off the bench with the bench mob then i think it could work, but not as a starter, gordon takes to many shots to be in the line up with kobe, gasol, and bynum. Go Laker's

September 12, 2008  05:26 PM ET

they have trevor ariza. they don't need another defensive sf. ariza reminds me of a young eddie jones (defensively) he's going to be taking lots of vlad, luke, and odom's playing time...

 
September 19, 2008  03:48 PM ET

You must not have been watching Ben Gordon much these past few years. He is a horrible defender and ball handler. To put him and Fisher at the guard spots for LA would give them a small backcourt and some fairly unreliable shooting. And what happens to Luol Deng in all of this? The Bulls just signed him to a pretty big deal. I don't think they did it just so they could trade for Lamar Odom I'm sorry but your scenario doesn't seem to make much sense at all for either team.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Coming soon: Log in with your Facebook account, send comments and Throwdowns to Facebook and more.

Start Your Own Blog

Start Now

The Si.com Cover Hub Go to the Cover Hub

Stub Hub

The 2009 schedule has been released. Search for tickets!

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    McDaniels takes jab at NFL Network
    Views
    12607
    Comments
    1375
  2. 2
    Sources: Big Ben having second thoughts
    Views
    4669
    Comments
    320
  3. 3
    Who's Red Sox shortstop now?
    Views
    24598
    Comments
    197
  4. 4
    Report: Halladay would welcome Yankees trade
    Views
    7864
    Comments
    182
  5. 5
    Giants DE takes it out on teammates
    Views
    47197
    Comments
    124

Most Active Users

Comments + Blog Posts + Throwdowns

  1. 1
    Chico 2.0
  2. 2
    BBK - Now it's all football
  3. 3
    rstowe
  4. 4
    gigi_iv
  5. 5
    Never NDing Struggle

Message Boards

  1. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    Your team sucks
    Views
    583
    Replies
    28
  2. NFL > Dallas Cowboys

    Good game against a Bad Team
    Views
    357
    Replies
    28
  3. NFL > General NFL

    Should the Bears give up on…
    Views
    176
    Replies
    45

Blogs

SI.com

Swimsuit

SI Photos