Beautiful Day for Football
  • 02:41 PM ET  10.12
Views
472
Comments
5
Toledo 13
Michigan 10

In many corners of Michigan fandom, the radical decision to jettison four decades of a winning leadership formula and hire Rich Rodriguez was hailed as essential medicine. The current struggles are still being defended as necessary to purge the football body of malignancies and bring about a glorious future.

There's even a cheeky and very popular blog dedicated to the "revolution" called the Wolverine Liberation Army. True believers in the wisdom of the move, the WLA even doubled down on their bet that a clean break with the past was essential, regardless of how ugly it got, saying after the Notre Dame disaster that the program had been "hanging on to the past too long" and was in need of "re-building and cutting ties with an underachieving past."

According the psychiatrists (or at least those who pretend to be psychiatrists on Wikipedia), Munchausen Syndrome occurs when a subject "exaggerates or creates symptoms of illnesses in themselves in order to gain investigation, treatment, attention, sympathy, and comfort from medical personnel." More to the point of this discussion, some of these pathetic souls are so good at this that they "are able to produce symptoms that result in multiple unnecessary operations."

This is what has become of the Michigan Wolverines. The program has subjected itself to radical chemotherapy despite not having cancer.

Twenty-four months ago, Michigan was in the middle of an 11 game win streak to open the season. Then they played Ohio State, in a battle of No.1 vs. No. 2, and missed a perfect regular season by a field goal - on the road.

Last year, they won nine games.

For the previous decade, they've won or shared the Big Ten title four times in a conference with ten other teams chasing the same goal, been to four BCS games and nine New Year's Day games. And just the year before the previous decade started, they shared a national championship with Nebraska.

This is the underachieving past?

Here's a partial list of the teams that haven't been to nine New Year's Day (or later) bowls over the last ten seasons: Southern Cal, Ohio State, Louisiana State, Texas, Oklahoma, Florida, Florida State and Miami.

Again, this is a partial list. I think there's about 110 more.

In college football, the real stars of the game don't make tackles, catch passes or throw touchdown bombs. They stand on the sideline with a headset and a clipboard, and they spend a bazillion hours a year flying all over the country constantly searching for the ideas and players necessary to get to the top and stay there. And they have help. Lots of help.

Michigan football hasn't been to all of those fancy bowl games recently because of the winged helmets, or the tradition, or the perpetually disgruntled fans. It got there because they had a coaching staff that knew how to create a consistent winner that played at a high level nearly every season, and that knew how to pour that culture into everybody who worked with them.

This is what got cast aside when Lloyd Carr retired and the University of Michigan decided it was time to cut ties with its "underachieving past" and not only go outside of their homegrown talent pool, but to grab a coach whose coaching philosophy cut against all of their tradition and the experience of the players on their team.

When experienced players started following the coaches out the door, many defenders of the revolution all but declared them lazy blobs or heretics that the softness of Carr and Co. had inflicted on the program. Good riddance to them!

What sort of hypochondria is necessary to look at that situation as it was and determine that it was best to purge not just the generals, but their system and the players who were loyal to it?

Who was winning all of those games in those past seasons? The water boy?

Through these self-inflicted dark times, the modified goal is that happy days will return when Rich Rodriguez gets his kind of players on the team. And that's probably right. He's a proven coaching talent, and once he's had time to build his kind of system the results should happen on the field. A new winning culture may finally grow upon the salted earth of the old one.

Probably.

But here's the deal: There's no reason to expect the new guys to be better than the group they replaced. Less than a dozen coaches have won or shared a national title since Lloyd Carr last did it. There's about that many or more every season with a decent shot at it. Rich Rodriguez will certainly be cheered when and if he gets Michigan back to regularly competing for conference titles, and in the national title conversation again.

But that's where they were when he found them.

Having the patient celebrate after a full recovery from a needless operation is an odd and risky way to practice medicine.
October 12, 2008  06:33 PM ET

I have to admit, I never would've put "Munchausen Syndrome" and "Michigan football" in the same sentence...let alone a blog.
This WAS a fun read.

October 12, 2008  08:11 PM ET

Great blog. You would think that Michigan would have learned from Michigan State's failed attempt at completely overhauling a program (ie.e, coach John L. Smith and his disastrous stint as head coach). Now that MSU has hired Mark Dantonio to instill the values andhard work (things that Michigan seemed to already have in place) the program is finally on the right track. Michigan is needlessly setting itself back 3 years. And just because a program has historically had success, there's no assurance of future success (see teams such as Nebraska & Notre Dame, who each look light years away from national relevance). I'm not as sure as everyone else that Rich Rod will automatically have graet success over time. Any coach that can't beat a 1-4 Toledo team at home with that kind of disparity in talent really makes me wonder. Time will tell, but I see Michigan being a middle of the back Big Ten team for at least the next 5 years or so, especially with Michigan State and Ohio State taking all their recruits.

October 12, 2008  11:41 PM ET

Good stuff...

I am not certain RR won't be a good selection down the road. So far he has made 1 HUGE mistake that is and will continue to cost him - he placed all his eggs in Pryor's basket while not pursuing other options (there were still some uncommited 3 star QBs available after signing day thast would have fit his system).

October 13, 2008  12:30 AM ET

DC.... thanks for the compliment.

BigTen... I'm not ready to compare RR to Weis and Callahan just yet. Those errors were of the "let's get us another Pete Carroll" copycat variety -- getting a pro coach and assuming that he'll just do magic in the college ranks, even though he has no experience with same.

RR did come with a record of getting college players to do big things. As did John L. Smith -- that part of your comparison is spot on.

Prove It... I agree with you. However, note that many of the more traditional offenses can adapt to the players available. For example, if you load up on good blockers and ball carriers, then a pro-set offense can make do with a modest QB who just doesn't screw stuff up.

The spread needs and DEMANDS a stud at QB. Lose that and you're doomed. The Pryor problem demonstrates the big gamble that goes with running a spread. I agree with you that it probably did more than much else to cause the mess of this season.

But that's in the nature of the system, and it's a mistake that could get made again.

 
October 13, 2008  03:39 AM ET

You are absolutely right about the RR spread being dependant on the right QB, but there were some better options available - such as Orhian Johnson, 3 stars, ranked 30th at QB. A mobile QB (has moved to DB) with a strong arm.

He didn't commit until February. He held out hoping for a viable chance to play QB but eventually had to make the choice: changed positions and play for a major program or play QB for a team from a lesser conference - he opted for the major program as a DB (not Pryor, but he does have enough speed to play DB and some moves).

Johnson would have been a better fit for RRs system than the choices he was left with, as would many other QBs who didn't commit until late.

Unfortunately, RR pursued none of them, and is now trying to fit the proverbial square peg in a round hole. His problem didn't start with not having a QB to run his system - it started with not bothering to recruit a back up in the event he didn't get his 1st choice.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Coming soon: Log in with your Facebook account, send comments and Throwdowns to Facebook and more.

Start Your Own Blog

Start Now

Stub Hub

The 2009 schedule has been released. Search for tickets!

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    No Favre Vikings jersey -- yet
    Views
    1840
    Comments
    1711
  2. 2
    Indians open to trading Lee, Martinez
    Views
    27260
    Comments
    295
  3. 3
    Yankees chasing Cuban prospect?
    Views
    23090
    Comments
    163
  4. 4
    Celtics putting full-court press on Rasheed
    Views
    10274
    Comments
    63
  5. 5
    Marbury's Celtics run over?
    Views
    8551
    Comments
    57

Most Active Users

Comments + Blog Posts + Throwdowns

  1. 1
    Porkins: NOT BILLY MAYES!!
  2. 2
    RobertMenn: Alves Rd3 TKO
  3. 3
    Perfectpats
  4. 4
    Sassafras
  5. 5
    Oso New Jack City

Message Boards

  1. NFL > Chicago Bears

    Bears ranked 14th on NFL…
    Views
    486
    Replies
    53
  2. NBA > General NBA

    Ron Artest going to Lakers!1
    Views
    105
    Replies
    12
  3. MMA > General MMA

    Cro Cop may be back
    Views
    3
    Replies
    0

Blogs