Seems like every commenter and blogger who discusses college football plays this game, and thats probably one of the biggest reasons the powers that be see no need to change the BCS system. It generates a lot of interest, passion, and analysis that a playoff system would eliminate, and maintains a distinctive flavor from all other sports with its bowl system that gives nearly half of the teams in college football a 1 game postseason. So who, among the undefeated and one loss teams, are going to play for the National Title? Here are the contenders and the flaws in each:
SEC: There are three teams remaining in the SEC with a shot at the title game. Alabama is the simplest one. Win out, and they are in. There should be no debate about this. They faced Clemson and won (back when that meant something), they crushed Georgia, and if they win out, they will have beaten LSU, Auburn (in a rivalry game), and the winner of the Georgia/Florida game. Further, they will be the undefeated, undisputed champs of the SEC. The separation between the SEC and Big 12 and the rest of the conferences is huge this year.
If Alabama loses one of the games leading up to the SEC title, because the loss is so late, they may fall to the odd team out. This isn't fair, but I can see it happening, especially if there are 2 other undefeated teams or if Oklahoma or USC gets their shortcomings together and finishes with a strong 11-1 record. It may not be right, but if they lose to LSU or Auburn (especially after this week when LSU allowed so much offense to Georgia and Auburn lost to West Virginia), that will be seen as a bad loss, and a later bad loss than anyone else. It would take a blowout in the SEC title game (which they would still go to) to have even the chance of impressing voters enough.
The other two teams in the SEC are Georgia and Florida. Georgia has rebounded nicely from its loss to Bama, and looked very good this week. I am concerned about their defensive performance. 38 points to LSU is a huge problem, no matter how they were scored. Florida looked incredible against Kentucky. If the winner of the Worlds Largest Cocktail Party (or whatever pc name they give it now), wins out, its hard to vote against them. Both Georgia and Florida did play a tough OOC game (though ASU is pathetic now, like Clemson, they weren't seen that way at the time). My opinion is the Florida Offense is humming on all cylinders now, and they will win in Jacksonville, win the SEC, and make their way into the National Title Game despite their one loss.
Big 12: There are four teams in the Big 12 who can make a case. For two of them, lack of name recognition is going to be an issue, even if they deserve a spot. If Texas Tech wins next week, and wins out, its hard to say they should not play for the title. This offensive juggernaut appears unstoppable, and so far, no one has even come close. Their defense is much better than a typical Tech team as well. They beat Kansas, a ranked team, by 6 touchdowns. As I said, if they win out, they have earned a spot. Oklahoma State on the other hand, needs a few breaks. They ought to get major kudos for holding Texas's amazing offense to 28. But they won't because they are not Oklahoma. They ought to be impressive to voters losing by only 4 to a team like Texas, going toe to toe and playing all the way to the end. But be honest, they are Oklahoma State. Like Tech next week, for a team that is not in the voters mind, its one and done, just like it was for my Ducks in 2001. For Oklahoma State to go, Alabama needs to lose the SEC title, and preferably be upset before that. The winner of Georgia/Florida needs an upset loss, then to beat Alabama in the title game. Either Penn State or USC also needs to be upset. It isn't fair, but it is what it is. Lose a game when you are an Oregon, Kentucky, or Oklahoma State and no matter how much you deserve it, you probably won't play for a title. If either Texas or Texas Tech win out, they are most likely in. Even with the perception issue for Tech, the strength of schedule to win the Big 12 South and the title game will give them a big computer boost. If either lose, it is probably too late to claw back in, even for Texas. Oklahoma has a shot, but I don't think they'll win out. While Tech is percieved as an offensive power with no defense, Oklahoma, despite phenomenal talent is the team playing that way. They were schooled by Texas, and despite the win, they gave up 35 to one of the weaker offenses in the league today. They will lose another game, maybe Tech, maybe Oklahoma State, maybe both of them. Until they do, they will be in the conversation, but I will be shocked if Oklahoma has just one loss when the season ends.
I expect that Texas will make it past Tech, but lose a game they shouldn't, maybe to A&M in the season finale, maybe at Kansas. These are kids, after all, and after the gauntlet they have faced, a let down is almost inevitable. On paper, the Title Game ought to be the SEC champ vs. the Big 12 champ, but I don't think it will play out that way.
Pac 10: I am a Pac 10 guy, an Oregon guy, but a 1 loss SEC or Big 12 team has a better resume than USC this year. SC did what they could...they scheduled OOC games against Virginia, Ohio State, and Notre Dame, all three are legitimate potential powers, but not this year. Notre Dame is decent, but not a power. Virginia has rebounded from a bad start, but is still just ok. Ohio State is good, very good, but not on a top ten level....The biggest flaw is the combination of poor Pac 10 OOC performances this year and USC failing to dominate in league as much as expected. Talentwise, they are probably the best team in the country. Performance wise, they are somewhere in the 5-10 range. If there is just 1 undefeated team, they may make it, but in all honesty, they shouldn't.
ACC and Big East: No teams worthy of discussion.
WAC, MAC, MWC, and C-USA: Tulsa, Ball State, and Boise State have not faced strong enough competition to be considered. Ball State has won all 8 of its games by double digits, but where is their signature win? They haven't even played the better teams in their own league (W Mich and C Mich who are both 6-2). They beat Northeastern, Navy, and Indiana out of conference.....Tulsa, same sort of deal. They have played Central Arkansas and New Mexico out of conference. They play Arkansas soon, that will tell us a bit, but not too much. They are scoring over 55 points a game, but no one on their schedule has less than 3 losses. Boise State at least has a signature win over Oregon, but it was greatly diminished when Oregon lost 44-10 to USC. Still, if Oregon finishes with 9 or 10 wins and 2nd or 3rd in the Pac 10, that is a meaningful win. But thats it. Fresno State has 2 losses, but all the other teams they will face or have faced have 3 or more. At large BCS berth if they win out? Probably. Title shot? After Hawaii's debacle, it isn't going to happen for any WAC team any time soon. BYU was certainly impressive early, and may have been the team with the best shot until they lost. TCU, had they beaten Oklahoma would have an outstanding win on their resume. Of all the non BCS conferences, the MWC is the toughest, probably better than 3 of the 6 BCS conferences, at least at the top. But Utah again lacks the signature win. They beat a 3 loss Oregon State, but just by 3. They went into the Big House and beat Michigan, but this Michigan has 6 losses and they only beat them by 2. If they had beaten an undefeated TCU and/or BYU, there still would be a perceived weakness, but with both of them losing once, the luster is gone. If there is just 1 undefeated team besides Utah, and if the champs of 2 out of the Big 10, Big 12, and SEC have 2 or more losses, and if USC continues to win by weak margins or even loses again, we may see an undefeated Utah in the title game. But thats a lot of dominoes falling right, and even then the computers will fight it tooth and nail, as will the system.
Big 10: The only team in this league that belongs in the conversation is Penn State. I saw their game tonight and despite their too conservative play calling, I think they are a legitimate top 5 team. Like Texas though, I suspect that just because they ought to win out doesn't mean they will. Michigan State is a good team and they may have the best offense in the league. They will challenge Penn State. I think going to a slightly above average Iowa team is the biggest threat though. Iowa is their last road game, coming after a bye. Penn State will see a couple of contenders fall away next week, hear their names in title talk, and I expect them to come out flat and struggle. Tonight was their first challenging game, can they maintain focus over a bye week feeling good about themselves? I expect them to squeak out a win in Iowa, when they ought to blow them out, and finish undefeated. If there are three undefeated teams at the end, there may be controversy, but I think Texas will fall, and the title game will be Penn State vs. Florida. Now feel free to tell me how wrong I am.

Damaris Lewis
Ashley Allen



Comments (9) Add A Comment
You are arguing semantics...the NCAA agreed to participate in the BCS system, therefore the BCS champ is in fact the NCAA champ. You may disagree with how it is crowned, who gets spots, and the whole BCS in general, but the BCS champ is the national champ of college football. Thanks for the comment though
yubaduck
Live Oak , CA
Total Comments (23)
If you want a playoff and can add to the conversation, we want to hear it.
All you need to do is provide the reasons (easy to do, though you left none in your last blog) and address the downsides (2nd one is a bear, isn't it?)
You will need a bit more than semantics as the winner of the BCS title game is currently recognized as the Champion for that year (aside from some disgruntled fans and those who would accept nothing shy of a playoff).
If NCAAF declared in their record books the victor of the BCS title game was the NCAAF champion, you and those in favor of a playoff would still be in opposition. Trudging down this path is a dead end, failing to direct the conversation in a direction to bring about the change you desire.
Believe it or not, even if you put it in all caps, repeat it over and over, add a whole lot of Es to your spelling of please, you will need more to increase rather than potentially diminish the chances NCAAF will adopt a playoff system.
Prove It
Frellin Cold In, AK
Total Comments (6741)
Nice Analysis. Very Thoughtful. I'm biased, because I'm from UF, but these projections sound extremely plausible to me. The next most likely scenario to Penn State / Florida (in my opinion) is the Big 12 champion will play Florida in the title game. I think even if Penn State finishes undefeated, it will be shunned by the voters for a Big 12 / SEC title game match. In a year when the Big 12 and SEC are so highly regarded, and only one year removed from two consecutive Ohio State blowouts in the title game, the Big Ten's current stigma is just too hard to overcome, even by the storyline of Joe Paterno going out with one last title. Penn State needed to beat Ohio State by 20+ points last week to overcome the Big Ten stigma. Maybe that's not fair, but that's what happens in a system of voters. Penn State will probably have a relatively close game against Michigan State as well, which won't help them. I'm rooting for them though. I'd love to see the Gators go against Penn State, in what might be Joe Paterno's last game - sounds like an ESPN Classic already.
free0wave
Hot Springs National Park , AR
Total Comments (2)
Good Blog. I do think Penn State is in.. but the other spot is wide open. I also agree Florida is playing better but do not count out UGA. The gators are playing well but stats mean nothing in that rivalry game. Expect allot of points and a great finish. Florida clearly has an edge with UGA's lack of D in the secondary but both know what is at stake.
Bama is solid but the rematch or game against UGA or Florida will be very hard to win.
drj0514
Total Comments (4471)
If Florida beats Georgia, Alabama loses twice, and Missouri wins the Big 12 championship against Texas or Oklahoma who come into the game with at least one loss, and if Penn St. and USC are upset and if utah loses or doesn't win big, then I think without if Florida St. beats Florida and runs the table they deserve to be in the BCS game. Though Missouri would probably get it over a one loss team from the ACC.
Bibr24
Washington , CT
Total Comments (1)
Bibr....let me get this right.....
1) Florida over Georgia
2) Alabama loses twice
3)Penn State loses
4) USC loses
5) Utah Loses
6) Texas loses, then either they or Oklahoma or Ok State or Texas Tech win the Big 12 south with one loss and lose the title game to 2 loss Missouri
7) Florida State beats SEC champ Florida and goes to the title game.
Wow, keep the faith man.
yubaduck
Live Oak , CA
Total Comments (23)
free0 and drj, yeah my main reason for picking Florida over Georgia is Georgias' secondary and also Florida playing very very well the last couple of weeks. One thing about college football is nothing goes according to plan. I pick the east champ over Alabama because with the exception of the Georgia game, Alabama has gotten off to several slow starts yet still won over mediocre competition. Thats a habit they need to break like they did against Georgia and Clemson.
yubaduck
Live Oak , CA
Total Comments (23)
Nice post, and somewhat informative in a oppinion side only. Is the BCS system flawed? Yes, of course it is. Is it ment to keep the money in select schools? Certainly so! Yet, from all the reading, stats, strength of schedule.....etc. It is the mentality at times of the conferences that assume that certain divisions are better then others. Lets take Utah for a moment, they played Michigan (Game one) ranked 25 at that point. Now turning points in anyones team ranking and conference games can be started by a catalyst such as winning the first game. Or When your coming off a wonderful win such as what Oregon state did against USC. Then on their high they lost to Utah. Then went on to crush other teams after that loss.
The conference champions of automatic births, do not make them power houses. Pitt had no reason playing Utah in the Fiesta bowl. Oklahoma could not bbeat a team such as BSU. My main point is this. The national media continues to showcase teams that have patted schedules at the start of the season. Take Oklahoma, or Texas. Their first 4 - 5 games are a joke. At least Utah decided to play teams that were not a joke at the start of the year to pad their record.
They weere not respected in 2004, and were given a crap team Pitt, when they should have played Auburn that year. Yet, they destroyed every team they played that year. The system is flawed and needs to be changed.
thank you
Torrid_rayne
Total Comments (28)
BUT CAPS ARE LOUDER!
Seriously, if the BCS was not sanctioned by the NCAA wouldn't it mean then that the teams participating could do whatever they want and it would not effect them? How could their rules and regulations for the bowl games be inforced if it did not have some sort of recognition by the NCAA?
E in Austin, Texas
Total Comments (1708)
Comment
Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.