dizzle18's Blog
  • 11:41 AM ET  11.07
Views
245
Comments
10

As we enter probably one of the worst economic states since the depression, it is painfully ironic to watch Major League Baseball's GM's toss around free agents like $10 million trading cards.  While many people are busy trying to keep their houses from being foreclosed, the sports media talks about Manny Ramirez possibly receiving $75 million over three years.  When many people wonder if they have enough money to heat their homes this winter, we're wondering if CC will take $100 million from the Brewers, or $170 million from the Yankees.  Am I trying to make a bit of social commentary on this?  Maybe a little.  But at the same time, I am also trying to point out baseball's biggest flaws; it's not steroids, or pine tar on a pitchers hat.  It's not shrinking and expanding strike zones, or missed home run calls.  No, it's none of the above, in my view.  Baseball's biggest problems originate from the fact that the players, GM's, owners, and the agents who represent the players, have lost touch with a sense of perspective, and instead of doing what's best for the game financially, they have chosen to engage in a business of excess.  LOTS of excess.  I love baseball, more than any other sport by far.  But it has gone beyond comedy in the MLB, when it comes to excessive contracts.  It's ironic, that this new age of mega-contracts, long term deals that go above and beyond $100 million, probably could be traced back to the current Brewers GM, Doug Melvin.  After all, he was the one who signed Alex Rodriguez to the Texas Rangers, for an absolute bargain of $250 million.  Back then, the idea of paying a player a quarter of a billion dollars was thought of as ludicrous.  Now?  Well, A-Rod's contract got larger, Johan Santana just received a $160 million deal, and CC Sabathia is looking at a $170 million deal.  It has suddenly become the norm.  Even the Brewers, who less then a decade ago had a payroll under $40 million, are throwing around $100 million for Sabathia's services. 

 What I am wondering, and I am sure I'm not alone on this; when does baseball finally wake up?  When do they realize what a folly they have become?  I realize that sports contracts are not going to shrink.  I realize that the fans who show up to support these millionaire athletes will continue to do so, no matter what...and I include myself in that category.  For now...but at some point, you have to wonder; when do the fans suddenly become tired with the constantly rising ticket prices, concession prices, parking prices, etc., to pay for these mega contracts?  When do fans of small market teams like Milwaukee, Cincinatti, or Kansas City finally become fed up with the fact that, everytime one of their players performs moderately well, a team like the Yankees or the Red Sox come along and swipes them away with another multi-year, mega-million dollar contract?  I'll admit, this whole saga with Sabathia and the Yankees is part of the reason why I feel the need to write this.  Here's the upstart Milwaukee Brewers, fresh from their first postseason appearance in 26 years, willling to pay the man mostly responsible for getting them there...but then suddenly, just as it happens every year in baseball, along comes the bloated, financial mammoth we call the New York Yankees; and in their hands is a contract that equals the GDP of several small, Latin American nations.  It is completely disheartening from the perspective of a fan of a small market team, and the ONLY solution is to implement a salary cap.  This has gone to far, and something drastic needs to be done.

Which brings us to the biggest question; what can fans possibly do?  Boycott?  Well, let's see; the only fans who probably care about placing a salary cap on teams are the fans of small market franchises.  Aside from the fact that boycotts of this scale and magnitude are almost impossible to be a success, there is also the fact that IF fans of small market teams were to boycott baseball games, they would only be affecting their own teams; and thus, putting their own franchises in further danger of sinking forever into obscurity.  That perhaps is the most infuriating part of all of this; there is almost nothing we as fans could do, without hurting our own franchises in the process.  I guess the best we can do is voice our concerns at the games themselves.  We in the small markets can wait for a large market team, with a bloated payroll to play our teams; where we can then proceed to protest.  Be it with large signs or t-shirts - or maybe hand out pamphlets or flyers.  This wouldn't be meant to "educate" the public to this problem; they're already fully aware of how MLB does business.  It would be more of an attempt to make a salary cap part of the conversation.  For example, instead of us debating what small market GM has the best system (the Oakland "Moneyball" system, or the Twins system, or the Brewers system), we should instead be talking about why these "systems" are necessary in the first place. 

Am I saying that public demonstations will work?  Absolutely not.  But, it is worth a shot.  I fully believe that Major League Baseball's survival depends not on how well the large market teams play, but on whether or not the small market teams are finally given a fair shot.  Just look at how Milwaukee was able to attract 3 million fans this year.  There is mounds of cash hidden in places like Cincinatti, Kansas City, and Pittsburgh.  Each of those three teams were powerhouses, back in the day when teams weren't spending hundreds of millions of dollars on building virtual All Star teams.  The fans of these teams WANT to support their teams.  They just don't see any point in doing that, if the large markets are just going to come through at the end of the year and clean out their clubhouses.  So please, all of you who care about baseball; at least TRY to make your voice heard.  Go to games, and raise heck.  Let the owners, and the comissioners office know that you exist.  Remind them that baseball exists outside of New York, Chicago, Boston and LA - and let them know that baseball outside of those cities is suffering, and that for every Tampa Bay, there's 4 teams who are struggling to stay afloat.  I know they don't like to listen; but we're the ones paying ticket prices, therefore, we have a duty as consumers, to let these people know that their product is trash.   

November 7, 2008  03:31 PM ET

When do fans of small market teams like Milwaukee, Cincinatti, or Kansas City finally become fed up with the fact that, everytime one of their players performs moderately well, a team like the Yankees or the Red Sox come along and swipes them away with another multi-year, mega-million dollar contract?

More important than a salary cap would be a salary minimum. I get tired of these teams that have to pay a luxury tax watching as these ball clubs pocket the money and refuse to spend it on their own players or free agents. The fans should boycott their teams until they start spending the money at home, not whining to MLB that life is not fair. You want to keep your players? Do what everyone else does, PAY THEM TO STAY! If teams are struggling to stay afloat, MLB should look at the books, if the city can't sustain or support a team, the league can compel an owner to sell. Then you'll see these guys start spending the tax money!

November 7, 2008  03:44 PM ET

BAM!!! THE GUY ABOVE ME HIT IT ON THE HEAD....spend the money you tight wads....

November 8, 2008  11:14 AM ET

Hmm, you ever think that owners of small market teams are cheapskates for a REASON? C'mon, you don't need to be an economics professor to know that player salaries aren't the only expense a team has to pay. Aside from that, how much do teams actually receive from revenue sharing and luxury taxes? Is the luxury tax from Boston, New York, and LA of Anaheim going to completely pay every single payroll, for every single team in MLB? Even Mark Attanasio, the Brewers owner, stated this year after he signed CC Sabathia that the team, and its $90 million payroll, would be lucky to break even...and that was IF they made it to the World Series. And this was a team who drew 3 million fans this year, so don't give me this BS about cities not being able to keep their teams afloat.

November 8, 2008  04:42 PM ET
QUOTE(#3):

Hmm, you ever think that owners of small market teams are cheapskates for a REASON? C'mon, you don't need to be an economics professor to know that player salaries aren't the only expense a team has to pay. Aside from that, how much do teams actually receive from revenue sharing and luxury taxes? Is the luxury tax from Boston, New York, and LA of Anaheim going to completely pay every single payroll, for every single team in MLB? Even Mark Attanasio, the Brewers owner, stated this year after he signed CC Sabathia that the team, and its $90 million payroll, would be lucky to break even...and that was IF they made it to the World Series. And this was a team who drew 3 million fans this year, so don't give me this BS about cities not being able to keep their teams afloat.

I don't have the numbers but yes. In some years the luxury tax has actually equaled the salary of some teams, like the Royals. This means that all the concessions and stuff is almost pure profit since the payroll is covered, and this means millions to the owners.

November 9, 2008  11:35 AM ET

Look at what Tampa did with Evan Longoria back at the beginning of the season . . . the guy didn't have hardly any big league at bats but they locked him up to a long term contract so they could get what they hope will be his best years. They had to pay good money to do it, but it was a lot less money than Longoria would have demanded in 3 or 4 years if he continues to produce. A lot of these small market teams have never been willing to risk signing players to long term deals until they know the player will produce, but once they know, the small market teams can't afford the players.

November 9, 2008  06:26 PM ET
QUOTE(#5):

Look at what Tampa did with Evan Longoria back at the beginning of the season . . . the guy didn't have hardly any big league at bats but they locked him up to a long term contract so they could get what they hope will be his best years. They had to pay good money to do it, but it was a lot less money than Longoria would have demanded in 3 or 4 years if he continues to produce. A lot of these small market teams have never been willing to risk signing players to long term deals until they know the player will produce, but once they know, the small market teams can't afford the players.

If they do it like this it makes alot of business sense to develop and lock up your young talent. You just have to make sure your talent evaluation is correct.

November 9, 2008  10:07 PM ET
QUOTE(#4):

I don't have the numbers but yes. In some years the luxury tax has actually equaled the salary of some teams, like the Royals. This means that all the concessions and stuff is almost pure profit since the payroll is covered, and this means millions to the owners.

Here's an article you should see:

http://abcnews.go.com/Sports/wireStory?id=4048682

Three teams have payed the luxury tax since it was put in place in 2003. Of those three, only the Yankees have payed significant amounts of money. Now, somehow, I have a hard time believing that, in 2007's case for example, the $30 million or so that New York and Boston payed somehow amounted to help for the rest of the teams in MLB. The lowest payroll in the league this past season was the Marlin's payroll, which was hovering around $20 million. Next up from there was the Rays, at about $40 million. So, unless the amount of money from luxury taxes spiked dramatically since last year, what kind of help does that measly $30 million give to the rest of baseball??

November 10, 2008  12:07 AM ET

I thought they paid much more than that.

December 25, 2008  01:41 AM ET

is there a place to protest the yankees and the lack of salary cap in MLB that the commissioner will actually read?

 
December 27, 2008  06:36 PM ET

I am boycotting, no support for MLB until their is a hard realistic cap that will be fair to all fans.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Coming soon: Log in with your Facebook account, send comments and Throwdowns to Facebook and more.

Start Your Own Blog

Start Now

The Si.com Cover Hub Go to the Cover Hub

Stub Hub

The 2009 schedule has been released. Search for tickets!

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Cowher to Bears or Texans?
    Views
    70637
    Comments
    3106
  2. 2
    Yankees to cut down on spending
    Views
    10443
    Comments
    1164
  3. 3
    Red Sox-Jays deal-killer?
    Views
    17243
    Comments
    1041
  4. 4
    Disrespected Ryan takes dig at Moss
    Views
    11880
    Comments
    724
  5. 5
    Martz to jump-start Bears offense?
    Views
    7995
    Comments
    571

Most Active Users

Comments + Blog Posts + Throwdowns

  1. 1
    Chico 2.0
  2. 2
    BBK - Now it's all football
  3. 3
    rstowe
  4. 4
    gigi_iv
  5. 5
    Never NDing Struggle

Message Boards

  1. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    Longhorns vs. Aggies…
    Views
    444
    Replies
    72
  2. NFL > General NFL

    New England-New Orleans
    Views
    171
    Replies
    30
  3. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    No More 'Canes and Gators
    Views
    143
    Replies
    18

Blogs

SI.com

Swimsuit

SI Photos