THE TRUTH's Blog
  • 09:03 AM ET  12.04
Views
595
Comments
7

SI.COM Columnist Arash Markazi recently posted on his blog that the NCAA should consider formulating its own version of the "Rooney Rule". This, for those keeping score at home, is the NFL's policy requiring teams looking to fill coaching vacancies to consider minority candidates.  Markazi feels that with the current climate in Div. College football as it is, the NCAA should create a similar policy.

 The TRUTH could not disagree more. Ron Prince, Ty Willingham, Sylvester Croom. What do they all have in common? Many things, besides the obvious, they are coaches with losing records. They are also coaches with losing records at programs, that at some point in recent memory, had enjoyed consistent success.  These coaches unfortunately were not able to maintain that status.

 Let me be clear and address what some of you may already be thinking about the TRUTH. I have nothing personal against these guys. In fact, I think that Croom, specifically, is the epitomy of class and professionalism. I sincerely hope that he gets another shot.

 But unlike some of my fellow commentators on Markazi's blog, I feel that imposing a "Rooney Rule" is not only a poor decision but also insulting to minority coaches.  As several minority friends have told me, they look at the NFL's policy as an insult. They interpret it as less of an opportunity and more of patronization. One can interpret it as saying;

 "we know we will get criticized for not hiring a minority, so here is our list of token candidates that we can say we considered, but never really did because we are going to hire who we wanted anyway"

 Also, I am wondering if the NCCA would be able to to this legally? I could see a pathway with public universities, but can they impose this on those institutes sitting on the plush lawns of private donations and alumni benefactors? Doubtful.

 The cold hard reality of this is that Div I athletics, especially football, is a business. And a very lucrative one that provides benefits to not only the programs but their respective schools institution wide. You win, you make money. You lose or, or in the case of some of the previously mentioned coachs, not win as much, you do not make as much money. No policy is going to change that or, prevent these coaches from being on the hot seat once hired.

 

TRUTH

December 4, 2008  09:33 AM ET

Wow a blog from The Truth and he wasn't trying to be funny. Seriously though I have to agree with you. As a black male I have always felt that things like the Rooney Rule, and Affirmative Action in general is patrinization. A man should be hired on his merit and not the color of his skin. If the President's and Athletic Directors find a coach that they are comfortable with and believe that he can be a winner then it shouldn't matter what race he is.

December 4, 2008  09:49 AM ET

Hova, thanks for your take on that. Another question that comes up is if the NCAA in fact implements this rule, what are the stakes? Fines? Sanctions? Postseason bans?

December 4, 2008  04:32 PM ET

This is my stance, if you interview 5 guys. And all 5 guy are sufficient and good enough for the job, and they happen to be all white, what is wrong with that? Maybe some coach that is black isn't getting interviewed and is upset might need to realize, maybe it is something other than my skin color?

December 4, 2008  04:41 PM ET
QUOTE(#2):

Hova, thanks for your take on that. Another question that comes up is if the NCAA in fact implements this rule, what are the stakes? Fines? Sanctions? Postseason bans?

I would assume it would be fines. Sanctions and Postseason bans sound a little too harsh.

December 5, 2008  08:41 AM ET
QUOTE(#3):

This is my stance, if you interview 5 guys. And all 5 guy are sufficient and good enough for the job, and they happen to be all white, what is wrong with that? Maybe some coach that is black isn't getting interviewed and is upset might need to realize, maybe it is something other than my skin color?

Your comments also make we wonder about this Black Coaches Association we've heard of. If this group still exists they have been pretty quiet.

December 6, 2008  01:28 PM ET

The success of the program is far greater and important than hiring a coach based on anything less than past performance.

 
December 8, 2008  01:42 PM ET
QUOTE(#6):

The success of the program is far greater and important than hiring a coach based on anything less than past performance.

Good comments man!

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Coming soon: Log in with your Facebook account, send comments and Throwdowns to Facebook and more.

Start Your Own Blog

Start Now

The Si.com Cover Hub Go to the Cover Hub

Stub Hub

The 2009 schedule has been released. Search for tickets!

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Sources: Big Ben having second thoughts
    Views
    7352
    Comments
    1009
  2. 2
    Report: Halladay would welcome Yankees trade
    Views
    28504
    Comments
    476
  3. 3
    Have Irish already offered Kelly job?
    Views
    37379
    Comments
    77
  4. 4
    Stoops to take Notre Dame job?
    Views
    4066
    Comments
    61
  5. 5
    Report: Tiger's injuries inflicted by wife
    Views
    1808
    Comments
    60

Most Active Users

Comments + Blog Posts + Throwdowns

  1. 1
    Chico 2.0
  2. 2
    BBK - Now it's all football
  3. 3
    rstowe
  4. 4
    gigi_iv
  5. 5
    Never NDing Struggle

Message Boards

  1. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    Is Bob Stoops being paid under…
    Views
    173
    Replies
    13
  2. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    tim tebow finally GONE!!!!!!!
    Views
    108
    Replies
    8
  3. NFL > General NFL

    Tiger Woods???? Wife smashes…
    Views
    104
    Replies
    29

Blogs

SI.com

Swimsuit

SI Photos