MrMiyagiJr's Blog
  • 01:21 PM ET  02.18
Views
349
Comments
8
I have spent the better part of the last couple days reading about the A-Rod saga and I've come to the conclusion that most of the sports writers out there are no better than the people that blog here and elsewhere on the net.  I'm astounded at all the "sports journalists" that now see it as their job to dissect every word that A-Rod utters and construct timelines (more detailed than the Kennedy assassination) to disprove his statements.  When, in fact, these writers have been absent when allegations, and confessions have been made in the past. I understand that A-Rod is the biggest star recently caught.  But, they all seem to forget that there are 103 names out there yet to be revealed.  Will they get the same treatment as A-Rod? Where is the demand that these people not only be revealed, but, provide the details that they unrealistically demand of A-Rod? Point is that they have done nothing but sit in their cubicles and wait for someone to leak a name here and there, and then pounce on them as if they are breaking the Watergate story.  A-Rod, like Giambi, said what they were able to and nothing more.  There are future legal ramifications to what they say, and because of that they are unable and unwilling to give the details that these writers seek.  I give credit to these two guys, they didn't blame anyone else, they took responsibility for their actions, as much as they could.  You didn't hear A-Rod mention that his name was illegally leaked, you didn't hear him say that there are 103 other players on the list, you didn't hear him mention that the samples were supposed to be anonymous, you didn't hear him say that the samples were suppossed to have been destroyed, and you didn't hear him say that Bud Selig and the Union can no longer be trusted by the players.  For alledgedly saying nothing, he sure said aloot.
February 18, 2009  02:27 PM ET

Isn't that what Journalism is all about...getting the big story? They can't really talk about the 103 names they don't have. A-Rod didn't take responsible for anything, he threw his "cousin" under the bus.

He said he was "young" and stupid", I'm not buying that, he was 25, that's not young. He's an adult, he claims he was experimenting....for 3 year? Once or twice is experimenting, 3 year is a habit. The biggest name in baseball gets caught cheating and lying and still after 3 interviews can't tell the whole truth.

I know people are tired of hearing about A-Rod, but its not going to stop any time soon, He brought this on himself, but its only my opinion...BTW, nice blog...

February 18, 2009  02:54 PM ET

That's my point, they didn't get it, it was handed to them illegally and now they all act self righteous with their indignation and disbelief. Why aren't they asking for the release of the other names? He did bring it upon himself and I give him credit for the press conference. Something Big Mac, Barroid, and others never have, and never will do. I think when he said he was young and stupid, he meant he had no idea what he was doing as far as steroids-he wasn't under a doctor or trainers care. Thanks for the read and comments!

February 18, 2009  03:56 PM ET
QUOTE(#1):

Isn't that what Journalism is all about...getting the big story? They can't really talk about the 103 names they don't have. A-Rod didn't take responsible for anything, he threw his "cousin" under the bus. He said he was "young" and stupid", I'm not buying that, he was 25, that's not young. He's an adult, he claims he was experimenting....for 3 year? Once or twice is experimenting, 3 year is a habit. The biggest name in baseball gets caught cheating and lying and still after 3 interviews can't tell the whole truth. I know people are tired of hearing about A-Rod, but its not going to stop any time soon, He brought this on himself, but its only my opinion...BTW, nice blog...

25 is young - but I get your point. He did take a good deal of responsibilty however I do feel. He mentioned his cousin but clarifyed that it was his fualt. How else should he take responsibility? Afterall there isn't much you can say after doing something like taking steroids.

February 18, 2009  04:42 PM ET

Let's not confuse journalism with the blogs written by SI.com on this site.

February 18, 2009  05:19 PM ET

The fact that baseball is more popular than ever shows that fans aren't deterred by steriods one bit. Many fans want to act like it's a big deal, but they can't back it up by boycotting the game altogether. Get on one side of the fence or quit complaining.

The media will always disect the big fish that are caught. These sports writers privately LOVE A-ROD for providing them with a story to write about and then immediately turn around to condem him because they are always and forever in a sanctimoniously self righteous position to pass judgement. How convenient. As if they've never done anything wrong themselves before. They love to try and toy with him and make him squirm only because it sells so well, and for no other reason. There is no right or wrong with these stories, only if it sells. So you cannot try to analyze them so carefully or take them too seriously at anything they do. Your attention is all they are after. And as far as that goes, it's mission accomplished.

February 18, 2009  06:21 PM ET

Thanks for the comments guys.

February 18, 2009  09:53 PM ET

I think it's a great blog. Yes, there is overkill. Yes, his comments are being dissected in a fashion that would make the Warren Commission look like amateurs. But when you're dealing with the biggest name in baseball and someone who was viewed as being the poster boy of integrity as far as PED's are concerned his being exposed (even illegally) - the reaction is not a shock to me. The media in recent years has taken on a National Enquirer mentality and they have to sell newspapers, magazines and attract readers and viewership. And let's face it - for whatever reason he's a controversial guy and there seems to be no middle ground in public reaction to him. If it were up to me I'd say that's enough as far as A-Rod is concerned - barring any addittional revelations. He said what he had to say. People can now make their judgment and move on. However, as I know you agree the issue of steroid usage and how its destroyed the integrity of the game is still a valid and ongoing issue of concern.

 
April 25, 2009  11:34 PM ET

Great Blog. I couldn't have said it any better.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Coming soon: Log in with your Facebook account, send comments and Throwdowns to Facebook and more.

Start Your Own Blog

Start Now

The Si.com Cover Hub Go to the Cover Hub

Stub Hub

The 2009 schedule has been released. Search for tickets!

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Red Sox-Jays deal-killer?
    Views
    35146
    Comments
    1174
  2. 2
    Martz to jump-start Bears offense?
    Views
    12609
    Comments
    905
  3. 3
    Notre Dame cancels Weis' recruiting trip
    Views
    46400
    Comments
    292
  4. 4
    Miami: Less Gators, more Bulls
    Views
    7647
    Comments
    250
  5. 5
    Artest: Free agents 'scared' to play in NY
    Views
    48784
    Comments
    174

Most Active Users

Comments + Blog Posts + Throwdowns

  1. 1
    Chico 2.0
  2. 2
    BBK - Now it's all football
  3. 3
    rstowe
  4. 4
    gigi_iv
  5. 5
    Never NDing Struggle

Message Boards

  1. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    Longhorns vs. Aggies…
    Views
    544
    Replies
    79
  2. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    No More 'Canes and Gators
    Views
    317
    Replies
    57
  3. NFL > General NFL

    Teams nooooooobody wants to…
    Views
    201
    Replies
    29

Blogs

SI.com

Swimsuit

SI Photos