Views
814
Comments
0
Posted by:
ozymandias
|

There are two landmark legal rulings in club soccer in terms of transfers. The first is the 1995 Bosman ruling. The second is the 2009 Matuzalem ruling.

The Bosman ruling, named after Belgian player Jean-Marc Bosman, had two important effects. First, it banned restrictions of foreign European Union members within national leagues. That is, the English Premiership could no longer count players from EU nations as foreigners, for example. Second, it allows players to move to another club for free at the end of their contract. In other words, it was soccer's Curt Flood decision. It was a victory for players in that they had more control over where they would play. A secondary consequence was the widespread practice of foreign (i.e. non-EU players) obtaining EU passports.

The Matuzalem ruling is slightly different. It builds on the Webster case, in which Scottish defender Andy Webster used new FIFA transfer rules to extricate himself from his contract with Hearts by paying the club was he was owed (estimated to be about 250,000 pounds). Matuzal??m moved from Ukrainian club Shahktar to Spanish club Real Zaragoza in July 2007 using that ruling as his basis. Shahktar appealed to FIFA and was awarded 6.8 million euros. The club, understandably, felt that wasn't enough for their captain and leading goal-scorer. So it appealed to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS).

The CAS, in its Matuzalem ruling, refined the Webster ruling and scaled back some of the player's power to extricate himself from his contract. The new ruling takes into account the player's importance to the team, his salary, and the timing of his departure in determining the compensation owed. In Matuzalem's case, that compensation is 12 million euros.

This is a good ruling. It restores some of the balance to the transfer system. Players should have the right to move when their contract ends, of course, so the Bosman ruling is crucial. The Matuzalem ruling reigns in some of the threat to clubs imposed by the Webster ruling; it restores the balance, which is crucial. It also renders moot Sepp Blatter's asinine comparison of professional soccer players to slaves. This is a good ruling that is good for the game, even if Real Zaragoza disagrees.

Cross-posted at http://spotkicks.wordpress.com/2009/05/21/of-legalities-and-jean-marc-bosman/

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Start Your Own Blog

Start Now

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Clippers, Warriors exchange barbs
    Views
    767
    Comments
    436
  2. 2
    Time to penalize NHL's perennial losers?
    Views
    963
    Comments
    273
  3. 3
    Report: Raiders to release Terrelle Pryor on Monday
    Views
    1278
    Comments
    59
  4. 4
    Will NFL owners blackball Donald Trump?
    Views
    1087
    Comments
    54
  5. 5
    Packers lovers have own dating site
    Views
    983
    Comments
    45

SI.com

SI Photos