09:33 AM ET 07.16 |
The following offensive line rankings were determined based on a number of
factors which include the new additions to the offensive line, injuries suffered last
season, the durability of the line, the average age of the line and the depth of the line.
The offensive lines have been divided in five groups and teams in each group are listed in
alphabetical order. To further understand each line, click on the team name and it
will lead you to a detailed analysis of the offensive line.
Discuss these rankings in our forums
See our 2008 Offensive Line Rankings
and Analysis
Very Good
Team
2008 YPC
- 2008 Sacks
- Avg. Age
- 30 & over
- Run Blocking
- Pass Blocking - Durability
- Depth
Atlanta Falcons
4.4
17
27.8
1
Same
Same
Good
Fair
All 5 starters back but will struggle if
1 or 2 linemen go down.
Carolina Panthers
4.8
20
27
1
Slightly Better
Same
Mediocre
Poor
All 5 starters back but as LT Jordan
Gross said: "As it sits now, we can't really afford to have
anybody get hurt"
Denver Broncos
4.8
12
28.4
2
Slightly Worse
Slightly Worse
Good
Mediocre
All 5 starters back but probably won't perform as well under
new offensive scheme.
New Orleans Saints
4
13
28.2
2
Slightly Better
Same
Good
Very Good
All 5 starters back; not the best starting 5 but 3 good
backups.
New York Giants
5
28
29.6
3
Same
Same
Good
Fair
All 5 starters back and should be as good as last season;
McKenzie's back is the only concern.
Philadelphia Eagles
4
23
27.6
0
Better
Same
Good
Good
Added Pro Bowler Peters, will once again be one of the best
in run blocking.
Tennessee Titans
4.3
12
29.4
1
Same
Same
Very Good
Mediocre
All 5 starters back, four of whom are 28 or under. Line
might be slightly worse if 38-year old Mawae is hurt.
Good
Team
2008 YPC
- 2008 Sacks
- Avg. Age
- 30 & over
- Run Blocking
- Pass Blocking - Durability
- Depth
Chicago Bears
3.9
29
29.2 - 30.4
3
Slightly Better
Better
Fair
Very Good
If Pace stays healthy this line will be one of the best in
pass protection but still average in run blocking.
Cleveland Browns
3.9
24
26.8 - 28.8
0 - 2
Better
Same
Fair
Very Good
3 starters back; at least 1 upgrade; a healthy Steinbach
should be a big boost for this running game.
Kansas City Chiefs
4.8
37
29.8
3
Same
Same
Fair
Good
4 starters back and one upgrade but Pro Bowler Waters is
unhappy and 3 starters are at least 32 years old.
Jacksonville Jaguars
4.2
42
27.0 - 29.6
02-Mar
Better
Better
Poor
Very Good
Better and with much more depth than last year. Even in the
worst case scenario, they'll improve over 2008.
Miami Dolphins
4.2
26
26.6 - 27.2
0
Slightly Better
Slightly Better
Fair
Fair
Should be slightly better at C and; a lot of depth inside
but need Long and Carey to play 16 games.
New England Patriots
4.4
48
30.2
4
Same
Better
Fair
Good
All 5 starters back but Brady will help decrease the sack
total; much more depth than in previous years.
New York Jets
4.7
30
29
2
Same
Same
Very Good
Mediocre
All 5 starters back but they need to stay healthy or the
offense will struggle.
Fair
Team
2008 YPC
- 2008 Sacks
- Avg. Age
- 30 & over
- Run Blocking
- Pass Blocking - Durability
- Depth
Baltimore Ravens
4
33
25.8 - 26.0
1
Slightly Better
Slightly Better
Good
Good
Four very young starters, three returning from last year,
with the veteran 6-time Pro Bowler Matt Birk at center.
Buffalo Bills
4.2
38
25.8
1
Same
Better
Very Good
Fair
Brand new line, no great talent but all five are hard
workers and very smart. This line will surprise many in
2009.
Green Bay Packers
4.1
34
26.8 - 28.0
1
Better
Same
Good
Good
3 or 4 of the starters will be back but a lot of young
linemen who could surprise; no irreplaceable starter.
Houston Texans
4.3
32
26.8
1
Same
Slightly Better
Very Good
Fair
All 5 starters back and working with Alex Gibbs. No backups
with experience but no irreplaceable starter.
Indianapolis Colts
3.4
14
28.4
2
Better
Same
Poor
Good
This line will be one of the best if Ugoh, Lilja and
Saturday stay healthy all year but that's a pretty big if.
Oakland Raiders
4.3
39
27.6 - 29.2
01-Feb
Same
Slightly Better
Good
Very Good
3 starters back, downgrade at C but upgrade at T; 4 backups
with NFL experience
San Diego Chargers
4.1
25
26.0 - 27.8
0 - 1
Slightly Better
Same
Fair
Mediocre
4 starters back and all 4 are young but RG is a concern;
McNeill, Dielman and Hardwick must stay healthy
Seattle Seahawks
4.2
36
27.8
01-Feb
Slightly Better
Slightly Better
Poor
Very Good
All 5 starters missed at least 2 games this year, all 5 are
back this year; can only improve.
Mediocre
Team
2008 YPC
- 2008 Sacks
- Avg. Age
- 30 & over
- Run Blocking
- Pass Blocking - Durability
- Depth
Cincinnati Bengals
3.6
51
27.2
1
Better
Better
Fair
Good
Only 2 starters back, only 1 at the same position. Lots of
changes but this line could surprise this year.
Dallas Cowboys
4.3
31
31.6
5
Same
Same
Good
Mediocre
All 5 starters back but they're old and pass protection
could become a problem.
Minnesota Vikings
4.5
43
27.6
2
Slightly Worse
Slightly Worse
Very Good
Very Good
Replacing Pro Bowler Birk with Sullivan will hurt; 2
versatile backups with experience; transition year for this
line.
San Francisco 49ers
4
55
27.2
1
Slightly Better
Better
Fair
Fair
Things can only be better with Marvel Smith at RT; will be
much improved in pass protection.
St. Louis Rams
4
45
26
0
Better
Slightly Better
Fair
Mediocre
So many injuries last season that they should improve
despite the loss of Pace.
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
4.1
32
26.2
0
Same
Same
Good
Good
All 5 starters back and all very young but haven't shown as
much improvement as we'd expect.
Washington Redskins
4.4
38
30.2
0
Slightly Worse
Slightly Better
Fair
Mediocre
Made two changes, should be about as good if Samuels and
Thomas stay healthy but very little depth.
Poor
Team
2008 YPC
- 2008 Sacks
- Avg. Age
- 30 & over
- Run Blocking
- Pass Blocking - Durability
- Depth
Arizona Cardinals
3.5
28
27
1
Same
Same
Very Good
Fair
5 starters back, will still struggle in run blocking but
should be pretty good in pass protection.
Detroit Lions
3.8
52
28.4
2
Same
Better
Good
Fair
One of the worst o-lines in 2008; 4 of the 5 starters are
back but many were hurt so could be a little better.
Pittsburgh Steelers
3.7
49
26.8
1
Same
Slightly Better
Good
Poor
5 starters back from last 11 games last season; will
struggle again.
Comments (0) Add A Comment
Comment
Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.