Views
119
Comments
3

The Media has consistently complained about inconsitency and fairness of the BCS polls/formula.  Let's look at some inconsistencies of week #3 of the AP poll.

http://espn.go.com/college-football/rankings/_/week/4

Inconsistency #1

tOSU #13, Oklahoma #10, BYU #19, and USC#12.   The rankings of these teams should be BYU, USC, OU, tOSU in the late teens (15-24).  BYU and USC both have a good win, a bad loss and a win over a bad team.  There really isn't 7 spots between these two teams.  While OU's thrashing of Tulsa outweighs tOSU win over Navy.  

Inconsistency #2

Va Tech below Oklahoma.  VT has a better win (Nebraska) and a "better loss" (Bama) with the same record.

Inconsistency #3

Houston below Oklahoma State - Houston 45 Oklahoma State 35.  So when does on the field not matter?

Inconsitency #4

Miami not in the Top 5.  Two wins against top 25 caliber teams. The only undefeated team with a better win than either of Miami's (GT and FSU) is Alabama (VT).

 

Until the AP gets the poll consistent and fair,  the members of the AP should be banned from talking about the BCS.

 

September 21, 2009  07:18 PM ET

The problem is, the BCS really only becomes relevant at season end, while the AP rankings throughout are not based simply upon games to date, rather initial preseason rankings, plus games played.

By your logic, after 1 game played, a team that wasn't even closed to being ranked should be vaulted to the top of the rankings if they happen to pull off an upset, even if nobody in their right mind believes they're the best team in the nation.

September 23, 2009  12:33 AM ET

if a team pulls a major upset week 1, then they should jump way up in the polls. BYU jumped when they beat OU. FSU jumped when they beat BYU. Houston jumped after beating Oklahoma State. I just think they should be more consistent. The pollsters just don't "punish" USC like they do other schools. It is a double standard that makes all "human" polls worthless. They need to strip off the names of the schools and then "vote"

 
September 23, 2009  08:53 AM ET

I wish they would do away with Rankings until after week #1 the preseason rankings screw everything up, I mean in all reallity not bashing Pete Carroll or USC or Ohio State but they both looked horrible in 2 games this year how you lose to an unranked team and drop only 8 places only USC knows. There are numerous schools that would not have a shot in the top 25 because of reputation schools such as USC, Texas, Alabama, and the like all good schools right now butg would they be where they are if they were not ranked in the preseason. Oaklahoma State is a great example, Michigan State another wait until they play ball then rank them.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Start Your Own Blog

Start Now

The Si.com Cover Hub Go to the Cover Hub

Sports Tickets From TicketCity

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Dez Bryant attends Pacman workout
    Views
    10323
    Comments
    351
  2. 2
    Texas's struggles deserve a closer look
    Views
    4210
    Comments
    103
  3. 3
    Source: Pike has held three private workouts
    Views
    25971
    Comments
    59
  4. 4
    Nets get help in effort to avoid infamy
    Views
    15053
    Comments
    53
  5. 5
    Stewart takes a shot at media's intelligence
    Views
    9252
    Comments
    53

Most Active Users

Comments + Blog Posts + Throwdowns

  1. 1
    Chico 2.0
  2. 2
    BBK - ready for opening day
  3. 3
    rstowe
  4. 4
    gigi_iv
  5. 5
    Never NDing Struggle

Message Boards

  1. MMA > General MMA

    THE UFC LIGHT-HEAVYWEIGHT…
    Views
    293
    Replies
    43
  2. MMA > General MMA

    5 Reasons To Watch DREAM 13
    Views
    77
    Replies
    5
  3. MMA > General MMA

    Bellator's 155lb Bracket
    Views
    58
    Replies
    7

Blogs

SI.com

Swimsuit

SI Photos