B Low's Blog

B Low

B Low's Blog

Bynam isn't Worth the Wait

  • 03:15 PM ET  08.07
Views
1120
Comments
7
The Lakers didn't get Jason Kidd because they wouldn't give up Bynam. Now if they don't give up Bynam to get O'Neal, O'Neal says he would like to go to the Nets. So now Kobe could be playing against Kidd and O'Neal together rather than with one of them, all to keep Andrew Bynam. If Bynam was that good, we would know it by now. Get rid of him and give Kobe some real help. A real chance at a Ring now is much better than maybe a chance at one in 5-8 years when Bynam may or may not be a star. Am I wrong ...

Comments (7) Add A Comment

August 12, 2007  12:29 PM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

Bynum is a stud in waiting.....The problem is we cant give up BOTH Odom and Bynum for O'Neal....And what exactly is he???? A broke down guy who neva won a big game with a game winning shot ala C-Webb.....If we gave up Bynum, Cook, Farmar and a draft pick......that wld be ok......Kobe and O'Neal with Odom as a 3rd option wldnt be bad.....I wld prefer Odom and Farmar for O'Neal but Bynum shld go after Kobe's comments......The alternative isnt very attractive.....Letting Kobe walk in 2 years and struggling until we can chase D-Wade or LeBron when they become FA's.....

August 12, 2007  12:31 PM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

I wld have traded Odom and Bynum for Kidd.....He's a great player......N the best PG since Magic......

August 14, 2007  05:01 PM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

Dont get J.O because he isn't a clutch player who makes game winners? The Laker's already have a guy who is pretty good at that.

August 15, 2007  10:46 AM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

If u noticed my 1st and main comment was he is jured a lot.....Plus when Kobe walks, J' ONeal and the rest of the squad will be 41-41 at best in the West.....

August 15, 2007  10:46 AM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

injured

August 17, 2007  10:38 AM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

So you think if they Lakers get J.O. Kobe will still leaves in 2 years? I guess I was thinking if they get him Kobe will stay. They will have to give up Bynam to get anybody just because he is so young with so much potential. As the days go by it seems less and less like anything will happen.

 
August 23, 2007  08:12 PM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

the only reason they kept him is because they didn't have another C last year

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Coming soon: Log in with your Facebook account, send comments and Throwdowns to Facebook and more.

Start Your Own Blog

Start Now

The Si.com Cover Hub Go to the Cover Hub

Stub Hub

The 2009 schedule has been released. Search for tickets!

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Sources: Big Ben having second thoughts
    Views
    7598
    Comments
    1009
  2. 2
    Report: Halladay would welcome Yankees trade
    Views
    30154
    Comments
    479
  3. 3
    Have Irish already offered Kelly job?
    Views
    39927
    Comments
    78
  4. 4
    Report: Tiger's injuries inflicted by wife
    Views
    2090
    Comments
    69
  5. 5
    Stoops to take Notre Dame job?
    Views
    4241
    Comments
    61

Most Active Users

Comments + Blog Posts + Throwdowns

  1. 1
    Chico 2.0
  2. 2
    BBK - Now it's all football
  3. 3
    rstowe
  4. 4
    gigi_iv
  5. 5
    Never NDing Struggle

Message Boards

  1. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    tim tebow finally GONE!!!!!!!
    Views
    155
    Replies
    12

  2. NFL > General NFL

    Tiger Woods???? Wife smashes…
    Views
    123
    Replies
    29

  3. NBA > General NBA

    Thunder's Unexpected Rise…
    Views
    80
    Replies
    1

Blogs

SI.com

Swimsuit

Hilary RhodaHilary Rhoda
Tori PraverTori Praver

SI Photos

Best Players 6-5 and UnderBest Players 6-5 and Under
Did You See That?Did You See That?

SI Writers

Top Stories

SI Vault

06.17.68 Issue View This Issue Read All Articles
11.05.90 Issue View This Issue Read All Articles