Troy O'Leary's Cow
  • 10:11 AM ET  08.12
Views
2198
Comments
36

It was the summer of 1967 when The Beatles took it to another level.  Already the best-selling band in the world, the release of Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Heart's Club Band represented a stunning, quantum advance from the group's previous, otherwise impressive body of work.  The White Album, Yellow Submarine, Abbey Road, and Let It Be followed before it ended, cementing the band's legendary status as the greatest rock ‘n' roll act that ever was.  Celebrated, lionized, from coast-to-coast and around the world, the Fab Four were inducted into the industry's Hall of Fame in 1988, their inaugural year of eligibility.  Rolling Stone Magazine anointed Sgt. Pepper with the honor of greatest rock album of all-time.  Time's passage has only enhanced the legend.  They remain the most revered music group in history.

A couple of weeks after Sgt. Pepper was released, Paul McCartney confessed to Life Magazine what everyone who had even casually scrutinized the album surely must have suspected:  The Beatles were users of LSD.  A psychedelic drug that unlocked the mind's creativity, acid aided them in the creation of their transcendent art.  It was illegal, having been banned in the United States eight months prior.

To my knowledge, nobody ever asked The Beatles if the music was tainted. 

So why are we so hard on Barry?

Sgt. Barry

                              Look closely: Where's Waldo?

Easy, lazy, knee-jerk bromides come up short.  Barry's race -- no, can't be that, after all, it's the dethroning of the civil rights icon Henry Aaron that we lament.  Barry's irascible nature -- no, can't be that either, after all, Sammy Sosa and Mark McGwire, that affable dynamic duo of '98, now evoke similar scorn.  The answer, it is submitted, lies with the game itself, the mystical, iconic place it occupies in our culture.  Baseball, we have somehow rationalized, personifies innocence, and so we demand it be pure.  Think James Earl Jones waxing rhapsodic in Field of Dreams:  "This field, this game: it's a part of our past. It reminds us of all that once was good and it could be again." 

But ... really?  All was once good?  Maybe so.  But not in baseball.  Arnold Rothstein fixed a World Series in 1919, merely marking the most public manifestation of a sport persisting years under the shadowy countenance of organized crime.  Carl Mays loaded up a baseball with saliva and fatally wrecked the skull of Ray Chapman, the historical emblem (though perhaps unfairly so) of a tradition that has winked and looked the other way at cheating, not to mention assault with a deadly weapon.  Berating umpires nose-to-nose (try that with a judge).  Racial segregation.  Cocaine.  Let's stop kidding ourselves.  Baseball lost its innocence before it ever found it.

Barry is simply the embodiment of the game, a business which exists within, not above, the "whatever it takes" society from which it spawned.  He is the CEO who promotes an accounting loophole and is rewarded with a big bonus; the salesman who stretches the truth and is rewarded with a fat commission; the president who lies to the country and is rewarded with a library; the president who ruthlessly manipulates a vote count and is rewarded with an inaugural ball.  He is America.  He is us.

I admit it.  I've been one, an unreprentent baseball romantic.  But 756 has caused me to take stock, and I'm now ready to repent.  No longer will I demand my baseball unadulterated, free from the moral relativism of this society, if not that of our very own lives.  It comes down to this.  Through the years, Barry Lamar Bonds has thrilled me with his exploits on the field - the sweet harmony of his swing, the rhythm of his hits, the melody of the crowd rising to its feet.  I don't care how it was made.  I'm just going to enjoy the music. 

Let it be.

Let Barry Be

                               Sorry, George.  R.I.P.

=============================================================================

UPDATED: Here's the Rolling Stone top ten rock albums of all-time; notice there's NO ASTERISK:

1. Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band, The Beatles

2. Pet Sounds, The Beach Boys

3. Revolver, The Beatles

4. Highway 61 Revisited, Bob Dylan

5. Rubber Soul, The Beatles

6. What's Going On, Marvin Gaye

7. Exile on Main Street, The Rolling Stones

8. London Calling, The Clash

9. Blonde on Blonde, Bob Dylan

10. The Beatles ("The White Album"), The Beatles

The magazine's review said it all:

"Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band is the most important rock & roll album ever made, an unsurpassed adventure in concept, sound, songwriting, cover art and studio technology by the greatest rock & roll group of all time. ... In its iridescent instrumentation, lyric fantasias and eye-popping packaging, Sgt. Pepper defined the opulent revolutionary optimism of psychedelia and instantly spread the gospel of love, acid, Eastern spirituality and electric guitars around the globe. ... No other pop record of that era, or since, has had such an immediate, titanic impact. This music documents the world's biggest rock band at the very height of its influence and ambition."

I don't sense any taint, do you?

=============================================================================

For more of my ramblings on steroids and baseball, please see this previous post opinionating on the Hall of Fame voters' resounding rejection of Mark McGwire -- A Plaque For Big Mac: One Blogger's Vote.  I promise it's much less pretentious.

==============================================================================

Special thanks to Dana Camerik, age 14, the Chief Technology Officer of Troy O'Leary's Cow.  It was her photo-shopping skeelz that gave this post its extra ... er .... juice.  She did it drug-free, so it's completely un-tainted.

August 12, 2007  10:22 AM ET

This was a very well made blog. I love the Beatles connection. I don't like Barry as much as you but I do feel sorry for him.

August 12, 2007  10:23 AM ET

As you can see, I'm a Doors fan. lol

August 12, 2007  10:31 AM ET

Beatifully written.

I may have to say, one of the better blogs I have ever read.

Kudos!

August 12, 2007  10:31 AM ET

How bout them doors eh Coletrain?

weren't they drug users? are they tainted?

August 12, 2007  10:31 AM ET

Tell me, do you honestly think Jim Morrison would have the name he has today, if it weren't for Drugs opening his mind?

August 12, 2007  10:32 AM ET

Very good. Really makes me think....

August 12, 2007  10:35 AM ET

Everyone did drugs back then. That is true.

August 12, 2007  10:37 AM ET

hehehe,,

everyone STILL does drugs.

Comment has been removed
August 12, 2007  10:41 AM ET

I see what you're saying Lana. I mean, it's alittle different comparing Barry Bonds to The Doors but I see where you're getting at. And even if Jim didn't use drugs, he would still be what he is today. Not all of his actions were the effects of the drugs.

August 12, 2007  10:43 AM ET

Barry used drugs to unlock his artistic side...

August 12, 2007  10:43 AM ET

Come on, I thought you had a man crush on him? All of his literary work, where on drugs.

His whole legacy revolves around drugs, sorry to taint your man crush, but there is no arguing this.

August 12, 2007  10:44 AM ET

Wow. Jim Morrison and JFK, Jr.? Seems my post is so provocative, it's raising the dead. John and George, fell free to weigh in.

Coletrain, I'm reasonably confident that "Break on Through" was not an ode to working out in the gym ...

August 12, 2007  10:45 AM ET

BTW, you should've shopped Ringo, and not George!

Give the dead some respect!

August 12, 2007  10:45 AM ET

There is arguing this. And I will. First, I gotta have breakfest. I'm starving. Then I will come back and explain why I said that.

And no, it isn't pasta.

August 12, 2007  10:46 AM ET

I'm not saying he never did drugs, he did lots of drugs, but he wasn't just a man who did drugs. Much more than that. brb.

August 12, 2007  10:49 AM ET

He was much more then that, but all the while the drugs where still there.

The type of drugs he did, don't leave his body, he was and always was HIGH.

Hence, the overdose. He was a great poet, a great writer, but he was stoned.

I'm not taking anything away from him, but if the drugs weren't there, the writing wouldn't have been so creative.

Drugs opened his mind, and creativity to "the other side"

Comment has been removed
August 12, 2007  11:16 AM ET

Ok...let me try to explain....

 
August 12, 2007  11:27 AM ET

I'm sorry for clogging up this blog with my comments but I gotta say the stuff i'm saying. OK...first of all...Lana, you are confusing me. I understand what you're saying. But you just said you're not taking anything away from him and then in the very next sentence, you knock the writing by saying the drugs made it special. Now...of course Jim did drugs. I'm not gonna argue that(BTW, that was a funny line about Break On Through, Howard. lol) but was drugs the only reason he became what he is known for today? No. When you look at all the Doors complex epics, (The End, When The Music's Over, Celebration Of The Lizard, etc.) to the person that doesn't know the Doors and Jim to well, it just sounds like Jim ranting and raving while he is high beyond belief. Those songs were not written on drugs. Jim wrote The End and Celebration Of The Lizard in high school, before he even discovered drugs. The End, was about Friedrich Nietzsche's concept on life. He created his ideas and thought, the people he read about in HS, to a poem. The part where Jim says the stuff about his father and mother, that wasn't about his parents. It was about Dionysain and Appollonian. The fact that you think the songs were different and creative mostly because of drugs is not true. Now once again, that is only 1 song. But when you talk to someone about Jim and drugs, they always bring that song up(even though you did't yet). He wrote MOST of his long, complex epics without the use of drugs. Jim took the things he read about and put them into versions of songs. Lana, you have it backwards. When he used drugs, the songs got less creative. And for my last point, when he started to use drugs, his life went downhill. Do you notice that if you go down the line of Doors albums in order, the music didn't have that special meaning anymore. Thats when Jim got heavy into drugs and alcohol. Jim got lazy. But those songs he wrote in HS, were poems that came from his weird mind and nothing else. And those are the Doors most creative songs. I'm sorry for this long rant.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Coming soon: Log in with your Facebook account, send comments and Throwdowns to Facebook and more.

Start Your Own Blog

Start Now

The Si.com Cover Hub Go to the Cover Hub

Stub Hub

The 2009 schedule has been released. Search for tickets!

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Chargers accuse McDaniels of trash talk
    Views
    21780
    Comments
    2805
  2. 2
    Source: Damon won't take pay cut
    Views
    48686
    Comments
    969
  3. 3
    Should Notre Dame join Big Ten?
    Views
    20020
    Comments
    235
  4. 4
    Weis won't resign
    Views
    42295
    Comments
    221
  5. 5
    Beckham won't own Montreal team
    Views
    1180
    Comments
    181

Message Boards

  1. MMA > General MMA

    Arlovski's next fight -…
    Views
    323
    Replies
    9
  2. NCAAF > Ohio State Buckeyes

    Season Analysis
    Views
    231
    Replies
    32
  3. NFL > Chicago Bears

    Jay Cutler Must GO!!!!
    Views
    202
    Replies
    26

Blogs

SI.com

Swimsuit

SI Photos