• 03:13 PM ET  09.06
Views
486
Comments
3

Exactly when did the NCAA take football away from the fans, and turn it over to the networks and other commercial interests? Just a rhetorical question: I don't know the answer to that, either.

Take a look at what's happening now to that sport we all (we as in anyone caring to read this blog) grew up loving:

To be a college football fan today, it is imperative that each of us now have a favorite team that not only is in a BCS conference, but is in the upper tier of that conference. Without such standing, your team is relegated to nothing more than fodder in every media outlet save the school's local newspaper. Think about that fans of schools like Indiana, Wyoming, etc.: have any of your teams been highlighted in any (national) television or print media in the past umpteen years? No. You are officially in the category of "also played." Your scores are scrolled across the bottom of the screen on a Saturday afternoon, or maybe even announced on a half-time show. Even if your team scored a major upset, chances are the "big story" was not how your team played so well, but how the power-house team must have overlooked you.

I had somewhat foreseen this phenomenon several years ago. When Division I split into I-A and I-AA, you knew it was only a matter of time before there was only one true Division I. When the BCS sprang to life, you knew the rich were only going to get richer, as a Super Division I began to emerge. Will anyone be surprised if the "mid-majors" are completely locked out of BCS bowls in the near future?

What really irked me on this whole subject was the way Appalachian State's football team was utterly ignored in the wake of their upset of Michigan. I (and you, too) got to see replay upon replay of the final blocked field goal, but I saw (or read) not one iota of coverage about how well ASU played in that game. A casual mention of how ASU won a couple of championships in "that other division," but nothing about how great ASU really is. Not a single feature about the school or the players! Instead all we are subjugated to: "how will Michigan recover?" "will Carr get fired?" "can Michigan still win the Big Ten?" "does Michigan have a chance to still get to the BCS championship game?" Think back: isn't this what happened to Boise State, to a large extent, back in January? Yeah we got replays of the great plays of that game, and saw the marriage proposal enough, but what about the team and the school? Biggest upset in Bowl history, and we know nothing of the team. (Hey, are those the guys that play on the blue carpet?)

Do you get my point? I really have no favorite Division I team (except my alma mater which hasn't had a winning team in ages), but I would really like some coverage of the real stories - not just the stories of the top 25, or the stories the gamblers want to hear. We should have seen a huge celebration of the underdog this past weekend, but instead all we got was the mourning of a slain giant.

September 6, 2007  04:09 PM ET

I disagree entirely. First, national TV can only cover so many games, and there are over a hundred schools. It has to choose some teams to cover and not others, so why not cover the "best" ones?
Can you imagine if you lived in Oregon this weekend, and both Oregon and Oregon State were done playing, but you wanted more football, so you flipped the channels to see who was on and they were televising Toledo vs. Central Michigan. Would you not say, "Why aren't they showing Texas-TCU!"
Second, I saw plenty of coverage about Appalachian State - sure, not as much as Michigan, but it's not like they were ignored. I'm not going to forget their name anytime soon. And ten years from now, I'm going to remember "Boise State won," not "Oklahoma lost."

September 6, 2007  04:32 PM ET

But they can still talk more about arkansa state almost upset and the blown call of the year and i heard nothing about it so ESPN could have put this as a top game because that would have been awful loss for texas.Espn should of talked about arkansa sate got screw on an onside kick which was an awful call because the refs said that arkansa state had more than 4 men on 1 side of the field so he messed up some coverage of that will be nice

 
September 7, 2007  10:24 AM ET

"ARE" more than 25 schools.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Coming soon: Log in with your Facebook account, send comments and Throwdowns to Facebook and more.

Start Your Own Blog

Start Now

The Si.com Cover Hub Go to the Cover Hub

Stub Hub

The 2009 schedule has been released. Search for tickets!

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Chargers accuse McDaniels of trash talk
    Views
    22090
    Comments
    2805
  2. 2
    Source: Damon won't take pay cut
    Views
    48783
    Comments
    969
  3. 3
    Should Notre Dame join Big Ten?
    Views
    20168
    Comments
    236
  4. 4
    Weis won't resign
    Views
    42740
    Comments
    221
  5. 5
    Beckham won't own Montreal team
    Views
    1189
    Comments
    181

Message Boards

  1. MMA > General MMA

    Arlovski's next fight -…
    Views
    327
    Replies
    9
  2. NCAAF > Ohio State Buckeyes

    Season Analysis
    Views
    233
    Replies
    32
  3. NFL > Chicago Bears

    Jay Cutler Must GO!!!!
    Views
    205
    Replies
    26

Blogs

SI.com

Swimsuit

SI Photos