Okay. Let's face it. The current QB Rating is weird. No one understands it. A 158.3 is perfect? I think that my new one is pretty good. It's simple, and it has loads of flaws, but what doesn't? Here it is.
(Passing Yards * (Touchdowns/Interceptions) * Completion Percentage + Passer Ratings -Sacks) * (Super Bowls /NFL Championships +1)
I think that my Touchdown to Interception ratio made it easier for old time players because of the emphasis on the running game back then. Also, I made Championships very important. Overall, I don't agree with very much of this, but I think my formula was pretty good. If I would have taken off the brackets, then it would change everything. Manning, Favre, and Elway would be at the top instead of Montana, Graham, and Starr. If you want winners, you can't argue with this.