RudeBlog
Views
2303
Comments
18
I'm back writing for FN. I just didn't like the set-up on SN and just wasn't feeling it.

 

For my return blog, it's nothing special, just my thoughts on Wrestlemania. But let me preface everything with this...

 

I was a huge fan of wrestling from the mid 90s to the early 00s. I loved the Attitude Era and the wrestlers that came with it. It was the best time period in wrestling ever. But around 2003 when The Rock left, I was gone. I watched it sparingly, whenever I would see it was on one Monday night as I was flipping through channels, but I never planned on watching it. Then, a couple months ago, me and my roommate were flipping through the channels and saw Raw was on. It was like 10:50 and Raw had about 10 more minutes. We turn it on to find out they're about to announce the Wrestlemania host. As we all know now, it turned out to be The Rock. When his music came on, we were both as shocked and in awe as the people there. With that, I was hooked. I watched Raw for the last two months or so, figuring out storylines and figure out the new wrestlers. And with the WWE bringing back Stone Cold, Booker T, J.R., Trish Stratus (ohhhh yeah) and inducting Shawn, I was ready. I very nearly ordered Wrestlemania tonight, but voted against it and found it online...

 

Which leads me to this. Wrestlemania sucked. In my opinion, there was far too much quantity over quality. I tuned in about 20 minutes late, but caught the majority of the matches. So I'm going to break down what I thought

 

* As I said, there was too many matches and none of them were very special (outside of 'Taker-HHH). There was something like 9 matches and there were matches like the Kane/Show/Santino/Kofi vs. Core match that was like 2 minutes, not an exaggeration. Same for the mixed tag match with Snooki (who impressed me). Wouldn't it have been better to get rid of those two matches and replace it with Money In The Bank? I say yes.

 

* Where was the MITB match this year? I mean, it's by far one of the more exciting matches of the year and creates that fun dynamic of "challenge for any title, anywhere" storyline. Did I miss something?

 

* WWE failed with bringing superstars back. You have The Rock, Austin, Trish, Taker, HHH, Shawn, J.R. and Booker T and did absolutely nothing with them. Outside of the run-in with Rock and Austin backstage, there was nothing. Since when did Booker call matches? Austin had a nice run, but I want more stunners. Trish's match last 4 minutes and Shawn did nothing all night. I will admit I loved, loved, loved listening to JR and Jerry over Cole and Lawler all day long. It was great having J.R. back.

 

* In my 2 months of watching, I grew a large hatred of Cole. God, I understand the heel role, but he was straight annoying. Same goes for this Anonymous Raw GM. Both need to be done with.

 

* That was you're big pay-off with The Rock, WWE? My online feed froze after the count out of Cena-Miz, but I think I gathered that The Rock came out, changed it to no-holds barred, restarted, gave Cena a Rock Bottom to cost him a title, then was challenged by Miz and gave him the People's Elbow. But that was it? 2 months of build-up and that's what we get? Epic. Fail.

 

* The match of the night, which wasn't a hard honor to obtain tonight, was Taker-HHH. That being said, it was nothing compared to Taker's last 2 matches against Shawn at WM. I felt like the match went for a lot of flair and not much technicality. There wasn't anything but big moves, which isn't something I like. Like it went 'Taker backdropping HHH, slowly sliding in the ring, walking to the other end, then flipping on HHH. 2 minutes later, they start moving again. That was the whole match. But it was a great match for the "wow" factor, meaning I loved them kicking out late, especially Taker kicking out of Triple H's tombstone. But the ending of the match was lame. Taker choking out HHH after 5 minutes of him fighting, then Taker being carted out. I hope that means he's retiring.

 

In the end, I'm glad I saved $55 on this PPV. It was lots of hype, no performance. Next time, WWE, choose some great wrestlers in long matches than 10 matches that last 20 minutes. I give you 2 out of 5 stars.
Comment #1 has been removed
April 4, 2011  01:07 PM ET

272 views, and 1, now 2 comments, and this isn't even relating to the blog itself.....

that seems about right.

April 4, 2011  02:44 PM ET

I loved that they brought back all my favorites from when I enjoyed Wrestling but man was it a letdown.

I really expected HHH to win so I was shocked by that but Taker didn't even lock in the move properly. They should have let HHH "pass out" instead of tap out too.

Hearing J.R. and king again brought back good memories. It's amazing what good announcing can do.

Despite that one bright spot, WM sucked.

April 4, 2011  02:45 PM ET
QUOTE(#2):

272 views, and 1, now 2 comments, and this isn't even relating to the blog itself.....that seems about right.

Way to contribute nothing...as usual!!

April 4, 2011  02:57 PM ET

Good summary, Rude. Sounds like they didn't do much with the storylines of a lot their current top fighters - Wade Barrett, Edge, Del Rio, Randy Orton...

April 4, 2011  03:59 PM ET
QUOTE(#5):

Good summary, Rude. Sounds like they didn't do much with the storylines of a lot their current top fighters - Wade Barrett, Edge, Del Rio, Randy Orton...

Edge-Del Rio fought, but nothing special. Same with Orton-CM Punk.

April 4, 2011  04:34 PM ET

Blog bumper.

April 4, 2011  06:40 PM ET

It would be more entertaining if he'd of passed out instead of tapped out like Nomad said. Kinda stupid how he was in a gogoplata, forget whatever the hell taker calls it, for 5 mins before giving up. I was waiting for him to do his trademark, "I'm out cold...oh wait, i just sat up" thing the whole match. I remember that a lot when I was a kid and was disappointed he didn't do it.

April 4, 2011  07:51 PM ET

I am being nice and commenting on a blog.

April 4, 2011  08:54 PM ET
QUOTE(#4):

Way to contribute nothing...as usual!!

see #9

April 5, 2011  12:24 AM ET
QUOTE(#8):

It would be more entertaining if he'd of passed out instead of tapped out like Nomad said. Kinda stupid how he was in a gogoplata, forget whatever the hell taker calls it, for 5 mins before giving up. I was waiting for him to do his trademark, "I'm out cold...oh wait, i just sat up" thing the whole match. I remember that a lot when I was a kid and was disappointed he didn't do it.

Exactly what I was thinking. I even looked away because I fully expected him to get out like old time's sake. Bad ending

April 5, 2011  09:26 AM ET

I'll agree 'Mania was flat this year.

Taker VS. HHH was match of the night, but from the quality the rest of the night that was not hard to do.

But that has been the trend for WWE over the last couple of years. The it has become more talk and goofy dance contests then actual wrestling on broadcast TV, and the PPVs are all about gimmicks like Money in the Bank (which is now its own PPV in July), Elimination Chamber, Fatal Fourway, ect. Gone are the days where you have two "Superstars", they aren't wrestlers anymore, put on a 20 minute match that doesn't involve outside interference, weapons, or commercial breaks.

On a side note, and this is no joke, WWE is changing their name from World Wrestling Entertainment to just WWE, because they are and entertainment company not a wrestling company. And with boxoffice "hits" like Knucklehead and The Chaperone I can see why they would want to distance themselves from 'rastling.

April 5, 2011  10:39 AM ET
QUOTE(#11):

Exactly what I was thinking. I even looked away because I fully expected him to get out like old time's sake. Bad ending

On top of that, he picked up the hammer, dropped it like he was passing out, then started moving again just fine. Seemed odd.

April 5, 2011  04:25 PM ET
QUOTE:

I was a huge fan of wrestling from the mid 90s to the early 00s. I loved the Attitude Era and the wrestlers that came with it. It was the best time period in wrestling ever.late 80's..

90's...Easily.

April 5, 2011  04:55 PM ET

And as big a dewsh as Michael Cole is, he's still better than Booker T. Why the hell is he still announcing? He makes Taz's time as an announcer seem positive.

April 5, 2011  09:31 PM ET

I would've bought it this year if it wasn't $55. That's just too much for one PPV even if it is the gran daddy of 'em all.

April 5, 2011  09:33 PM ET
QUOTE(#12):

On a side note, and this is no joke, WWE is changing their name from World Wrestling Entertainment to just WWE, because they are and entertainment company not a wrestling company. And with boxoffice "hits" like Knucklehead and The Chaperone I can see why they would want to distance themselves from 'rastling.

Yeah right, I don't see that getting over at all, ever.

 
April 5, 2011  10:49 PM ET
QUOTE(#20):

Yeah right, I don't see that getting over at all, ever.

Yeah well the internal memo is that the males are "Superstars", females are "Divas" and they are "Entertainment" not wrestling because they have expanded as a company. But yeah WWE will always be known as a wrestling company as long as they have people competing in the squared circle.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Start Your Own Blog

Start Now

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    'Melo wants to be wooed (like, Howard wooed)
    Views
    2201
    Comments
    1352
  2. 2
    Cashman scratching his head over Pineda
    Views
    888
    Comments
    499
  3. 3
    Farrell defends Fenway's 'sleep room'
    Views
    2025
    Comments
    480
  4. 4
    Vogel coaching for his job
    Views
    541
    Comments
    435
  5. 5
    Youthful Red Wings are rattled
    Views
    2123
    Comments
    291

SI.com

SI Photos