From the Podium
Views
1255
Comments
0

I'm a JD/MBA student and I am not surprised by the judge's ruling in federal court yesterday. Vick received a harsher sentence than any of his co-defendants. I do not think that the judge was sending a message to professional athletes or celebrities. I believe the severity of the sentence speaks to the nature of the crime, Vick's leadership in the criminal effort and his less than optimal cooperation with the court and behavior since his indictment left the judge with no alternative. The fiduciary principal of this criminal endeavor should receive the harshest sentence because he was the ultimate but for cause of the dog fighting ring. I believe that Vick is remorseful for his crime and intends to seek redemption from the public on a long term basis, but he certainly has it to do and the sentence sends a convincing message about the conduct for which he is now being punished.

What do you think? Should Vick have gotten more time? Less? Did his celebrity status amplify or diminish the amount of time a regular person would have received for the same crime with the same background? And even if Vick is rehabilitated in two years and in shape to play, is any owner crazy enough to hire him to play in the NFL again?

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Start Your Own Blog

Start Now

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    D'Antoni's newest 'blunder'
    Views
    2734
    Comments
    866
  2. 2
    Bryant headed back to Germany
    Views
    2958
    Comments
    820
  3. 3
    Baseball's top 2015 free agent
    Views
    2391
    Comments
    527
  4. 4
    Shakeup looms for White Sox
    Views
    5048
    Comments
    331
  5. 5
    The NHL's model franchise?
    Views
    2230
    Comments
    139

SI.com

SI Photos