OrangeFan's Blog
  • 03:57 PM ET  12.12
Views
773
Comments
4

After reading this article on ESPN.com(http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3151479), there's almost no point in watching George Mitchell's press conference on Thursday in which he will tell us the results of his 20-month investigation on steroid use in baseball.

Here's why:

1)  We know what it's all about(drug use), and most of us won't know the names of at least half of the players.  At least we shouldn't know their names, because the players that need the help of performance enhancing drugs are the players who are shadowed by superstars.  Not that it gives them an excuse to use drugs, but put yourself in the position where you are among the greatest players in your sport, but nobody seems to know your name.

2)  We know what time it is happening, and the article says that the results will also be posted on MLB.com.  Plus, we'll all see it about 300 times on Sportscenter in the next 2 weeks.  Come on, you can't deny it.  How many times do you turn on ESPN every day?  I probably average 15 times a day.

3)  The article also says Bud Selig won't likely be there.  This means that there will be no entertaining shots of baseball's old-fashioned commissioner shaking his head in disgust as he hears the names of all the players in his league whose stats are tainted.

December 12, 2007  04:22 PM ET

they just made to drop all this. Steroids saved baseball. Not to say that using drugs is good. Baseball turned the other cheek

December 12, 2007  04:25 PM ET

I want the names, no matter how small in performance stature they are. McGwire was using them and he was already a star. Dont assume there wont be any shockers in there.

December 12, 2007  05:33 PM ET

Are you kidding me? Did Dre Dilla just say that "Drugs are good"... ?? Also, drugs did NOT save baseball... the steroid scandal is doing almost as much damage as the strike did. People hate this steroid drama almost as much as they hate the lack of a salary cap in MLB. As far as not releasing all the names, that doesn't make any sense, and it's going to breed an amount of favoritism... if you announce any single players name from this report, then it is only fair that you announce ALL of their names.

 
December 12, 2007  06:07 PM ET

I think the real shocker will be who ISN'T using. My guess is that an overwhelming percentage of MLB players are juicing.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Coming soon: Log in with your Facebook account, send comments and Throwdowns to Facebook and more.

Start Your Own Blog

Start Now

The Si.com Cover Hub Go to the Cover Hub

Stub Hub

The 2009 schedule has been released. Search for tickets!

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Meeting with fans backfires on Browns owner
    Views
    28205
    Comments
    852
  2. 2
    Ex-Eagle: Cowboys everything wrong about NFL
    Views
    19281
    Comments
    549
  3. 3
    Canseco wants to fight A-Rod
    Views
    39774
    Comments
    205
  4. 4
    Mangini scaring off GM candidates?
    Views
    9643
    Comments
    138
  5. 5
    Gator Bowl eyeing Notre Dame
    Views
    2861
    Comments
    94

Most Active Users

Comments + Blog Posts + Throwdowns

  1. 1
    Porkins: F U to Hell, BCS
  2. 2
    RobertMenn: You stole my rake
  3. 3
    Perfectpats
  4. 4
    sign here
  5. 5
    Oso: Yankees win again?

Message Boards

  1. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    Rivalries/hated teams
    Views
    426
    Replies
    41
  2. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    CFB Game Day 11/7/2009
    Views
    371
    Replies
    117
  3. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    Sports Illustrated says Pac 10…
    Views
    254
    Replies
    67

Blogs