• 05:50 PM ET  12.20
Views
240
Comments
0

I've now read a handful of articles wherein the authors, amazingly enough, tried to throw some of the blame for MLB's steroids mess on the fans. Of all the unmitigated gall!

How many of you showed up at a ballgame with a sign that read "We Want Refunds If No Homeruns"? I never saw one, or a sign with any similar sentiment. We just wanted to see a good game between (what we once believed to be) the best players to play the game. We didn't demand that the players ran faster, hit farther, or throw harder; their best was good enough.

How many of you ever expressed the sentiment that you didn't care about steroid use as long as your hero kept knocking 'em outa the park, or kept firing BBs in the high 90s? No one said that to me.

Did games in the past few years that featured Bonds or Clemens sell out more than others? Sure... everyone wanted to see history being made. Did we go to the games to show our support for steroids? No!!! We went to the games to show support for our teams and our heroes. Some of us still remember when players appreciated fans' support, and when the hometown team was ours.

I don't know of a single fan who wanted his "hero" to be anything but the genuine article. No one I know would have considered the McGwire/Sosa homerun race of much significance at all if we'd been told the two may have been juiced. But nothing was written that could detract from the race that saved baseball. That historic season is now little more than a disappointment to most fans these days. Mark and Sammy - Milli and Vanilli - like it or not.

You want to blame the Commissioner for not clamping down on steroids? Fine. You want to blame the Union? Fine. But blame the fans? Not hardly. Those writers trying to do that would be better served taking a long look in the mirror and seeing what he or his employer did to prevent the mess. Did your organization make any real demands to get steroids out of sports before Congress stepped in? No. Did you do any investigation into any steroid use allegations? No. With all of its investigative resources, all the sports media could provide us was some insight into who was hanging out at what nightclub with whom, and a bunch of other crap we had no business knowing.

Jose Canseco was the bad guy, they wrote. Innocent until proven guilty, they wrote. You idiots shouldn't have believed us, they seem to be writing now.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Coming soon: Log in with your Facebook account, send comments and Throwdowns to Facebook and more.

Start Your Own Blog

Start Now

The Si.com Cover Hub Go to the Cover Hub

Stub Hub

The 2009 schedule has been released. Search for tickets!

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Parcells to Browns?
    Views
    86909
    Comments
    393
  2. 2
    Chargers accuse McDaniels of trash talk
    Views
    1932
    Comments
    289
  3. 3
    Chivas USA to hire Sampson
    Views
    1328
    Comments
    167
  4. 4
    FSU to offer Bowden compromise?
    Views
    10881
    Comments
    142
  5. 5
    Will Weis agree to Irish exit today?
    Views
    15556
    Comments
    129

Message Boards

  1. NFL > Chicago Bears

    Week 11...The Philadelphia…
    Views
    290
    Replies
    95
  2. NFL > General NFL

    Tranny stripper missing from…
    Views
    176
    Replies
    17
  3. MMA > General MMA

    thoughts on 106
    Views
    134
    Replies
    32

Blogs

SI.com

Swimsuit

SI Photos