A couple of quick thoughts
These non-football days are hard on me: as a result, I tend to over-focus on any NFL or NCAA news, even when it is not-so-news. An example: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writers/don_banks/05/09/vick/index.html ; Interesting article. As someone who grew up in the ATL and who went to school at UGA, it interests me.
One small critique however: Mr. Banks (who I respect) constantly references "sources who spoke on condition of anonymity". It is my understanding that, according to the the principles of journalism, you cannot base an article completely upon the reports of 'anonymous sources', given that there is very very little to prevent them from saying anything that they feel will generate a response, since they are freed from any culpability for their statements due to the fact that their identities will be kept secret. I understand that the protection of newssources is paramount in certain situations, such as "****" for Woodward and Bernstein investigating the Watergate scandal, but in this situation is not one of those, I think.
New Orleans Saints Camp
