Backslide Blog

Not Your Father's Celtics

The Boston Celtics are World Champs. Congratulations and it's about time. For a franchise, and fan base, that likes to remind everyone just how truly head and shoulders the Celtics are above other NBA franchises, it's about time.

Celtic backers are quick to remind anyone and everyone of the great players who have worn the Celtic green and the unparalleled history of the franchise. Seventeen NBA Titles, including a streak of 8 in a row. A streak that In the modern era will be very difficult, if not impossible, for any professional franchise to match. Add to that the 31 men associated with the franchise currently enshrined in the Basketball Hall of Fame and the history speaks for itself. The Celtics are the most storied franchise in NBA history.

But how has the model franchise fared in the modern era? This may come as blasphemy to many Celtic fans still drunk from last weeks culmination of a season long journey, but simply put, not that well. In what is widely acknowledged as the NBA's modern era, or since Magic and Larry first laced up their Forum Blue and Gold and Black Leather Converse respectively, the C's have hardly lived up to the lofty standards established by their forefathers.

From the '79-'80 Season through the '07-'08 Campaign, the Celtics have posted a .572 winning percentage, going 1337 and 1009. Not bad. But this includes a 778 and 830 record, or .509 losing percentage, between the title years of '86 and '08. The modern era has also seen the Beloved Boys of Beantown turn in 11 losing seasons wrapped around 8 straight sub-.500 efforts in a row. Hardly the foundation upon which great franchises are built.

On the Championship front, things have been a bit more positive for the boys in green. Four titles in 30 years? There are franchises that would sell their soul for 1 title in 30 years. Well, maybe not Donald T. Sterling. But I digress. Where does this championship haul rank against other franchises over the same period of time?

* One better than Detroit's 3 Titles .

* Tied with the San Antonio Spurs at 4 each.

* Trailing the Chicago Bulls who have hoisted the Larry O'Brien Trophy 6 times.

* Half as many as the Los Angeles Lakers who have brought home 8 titles.

That last one has to hurt, particularly when one considers the Celtics are .500 in head to head series against the franchise every Celtic fan loves to hate.

Finally, a Celtic franchise that in large part has built its name on championship winning streaks has yet to successfully defend a title in the modern era while the Pistons, Rockets, Bulls and Lakers all have made encore appearances in the championship circle.

This year's Celtic team, thanks to a friend helping a friend to rebuild their old franchise, was the best in the NBA. Making their way through a tough Eastern Conference and simply outplaying, out-hustling and physically dominating the NBA MVP and a young Laker team in the Finals should put any arguments to the contrary to rest. But as we acknowledge the greatness of the '07-'08 Celtics, we must also put to rest the notion of historic Celtic Dominance. In the modern era, there are teams with more titles, superior winning percentages and simply better histories for this fallacy to continue.

Randy. Randy. Randy.

So much excitement about the 2007 New England Patriots and all they have accomplished this season. For now, most of the excitement seems to be centered on numbers. And impressive numbers they are. Sixteen wins against zero losses, fifty touchdown passes, one hundred twelve receptions, and the list goes on and on. What's that? I've forgotten an important statistic? Of course, how could I forget about Randy Moss and his 23 touchdown receptions over the course of a 16 game season, breaking a record established 20 seasons past. An impressive accomplishment. But how impressive?

What if the person who set the mark prior to Moss did so in 25% fewer games? And what if the rules this man played under allowed a level of contact that may cost a defensive back a game check in today's NFL? And what if the man, renowned for his work ethic and unending pursuit of perfection, ran, with precision, all 9 routes of the passing tree, and not just those that kept him outside of the hash marks? Would his 22 TD receptions be as impressive as Moss's 23?

For those who believe the NFL was born on a snowy night in Foxboro, MA in January of 2002, the 23 TD receptions is probably more impressive than the mark of 22 established in 1987 by the greatest receiver of all time**, Jerry Rice. For those who have been watching the game for a few years longer than that, Rice's record still remains a much more impressive accomplishment.

This is not a question of hating a person or a team. It's not even a question of like versus dislike. Facts people. Simple facts.

What Moss accomplished does not compare to Rice. To truly have equaled Jerry's accomplishment, Randy would have to have reached the milestone in week 12 or have scored 28 TD's.

It's easy to dismiss these points as simple dislike. Instead, why not try to explain why it is that I am wrong?






**And save yourself the embarrassment of arguing that Moss is the greatest of all time. Any player who routinely takes plays off and has a history of quitting on teams and teammates does not warrant discussion in debates about the "greatest" anything.