Message Boards

I'm amused by the Cy Young talk for CC Sabathia. Truly amused and amazed. I've analyzed the 20 series Milwaukee has had since it acquired CC. CC has 14 starts - a sterling 9-1 record and great ERA. However, further analysis of those 20 series reveals some interesting information (which may say more about fired manager Yost than it says about CC). CC's 9 wins came against 9 different teams (Rockies, Reds, Giants, Cards, Braves, Nats, Padres, Astros and Pirates) - but only 2 of those teams had winning records (Cards and Astros). The combined winning percentage of those 9 teams (today's records): .454. CC has 4 no decisions during that time: 2 games where he was the losing pitcher of record when removed (Cubs and Reds), and 2 games where winning pitcher of record, but his bullpen blew a lead (Pirates and Padres - can't blame him for that). Brewers split those 4 games. And of course, the big loss to the Cubs last night.

Here's where it gets interesting - the 6 series he did NOT pitch in: Astros, Reds, Dodgers, Cards, Mets and Phillies. Combined winning percentage of those teams: .525 (.538 if you throw out the Reds). 5 of 6 of those teams have winning records and 4 of them are in the playoff hunt. In other words, his 9 wins have come against mainly patsies; his lone loss against the Cubs; in most series where he could have faced a potentially tougher opponent, he did not pitch. In the Brewers last ten series, he has 2 wins, 1 loss, 4 did not pitch, and 3 no decisions (his team did win 2 of those 3 games). Don't know what to make of it other than perhaps Ned Yost didn't know how to juggle his lineup to get his ace against teams he HAD to beat. In those 6 series where he did not pitch, his team went 4-13. You don't think another win or two during those 6 series would have kept Yost his job?

Certainly impressed with the 9-1 record, but would like to see what he would have done up against more of the NL's best - Dodgers, Mets, Phillies. We know what he did against the Cubs: 1 loss, 1 removed from game after 6.2 as losing pitcher of record. Perhaps that 9-1 is not as stellar as we might think.