FanNation - The Republic of Sport

Im going with 31 to 17. Packers over Bears... just too much offense on the green and gold. Go Pack. The Bears still suck!

I would love to see the Packers have a great season, just to tick off Farve, who will probably not survive the 1st 3 games.

To hear the Vikings are shopping Jackson, they better hope they get no takers.

QUOTE:

Originally posted 07:06 PM ET  09.09 by FMCH

"......... the guy posting as GSH1 is the same guy who got booted off the PackerReport website because he was such a tool."

GSH1 is not anyone else. He's a Bears fan and is still here and hasn't been booted from anywhere. I can vouch for that. Now, there may be another one, but the one I know about, is not the one you're referring to.

Well, this Cowboy gal is greatly impressed with Rodgers and his maturity as he has developed into one of the elite passers in the NFL. It's still amazing that when they talk about this division they leave him out-they finally mentioned him on NFL LIVE Wednesday and it was refreshing! He has all the weapons to go deep in the playoffs and your GM did a GREAT job of pairing him with elite receivers, great offensive line, and a defense that is made for the 3-4. MY prediction for this game:

Packers:38
Bears:17
You CAN"T underestimate the importance of elite receivers for a qb. Regardless of how good they may be, if you can't get the ball into the hands of a player like Jennings who can change a game on the drop of a dime it will catch up with you.

FANTASTIC REBUILDING JOB AND I HOPE YOU WIN YOUR DIVISION!

QUOTE(#5):

Originally posted 04:00 AM ET  09.10 by bgduece

The Packers defense is absolutely terrible...Bears 24Packers 13

The Bears receivers are absolutely terrible...you're the only ones that would use a punt returner for a #1. Maybe you should consider paying one some time. While you're at it find someone to replace Orlando Pace who was getting beat badly by a bad Denver defense. There's more to winning titles than going and securing a qb, if you don't pay for the rest then you're wasting time. Everyone isn't inlove with your team and is entitled to their opinion so please accept the fact that the Packers front office did a better job at building a team than the bears did and they didn't need 60 years to find a qb...that's insane. You'll come out of the fantasy as soon as you realize it takes more than one person for a championship.

QUOTE:

Originally posted 07:06 PM ET  09.09 by FMCH

I could swear that the guy posting as GSH1 is the same guy who got booted off the PackerReport website because he was such a tool.

Before you call someone out in a post you should have your facts straight, I only post here at fan nation and on a Bears Forum, I am a Bear Fan and have no reason nor have I ever troll posted on any Packer report or whatever it is. I don't know what your problem is but I bet it's hard to pronounce.

24-14 Pack prevails!! I really liked the pressure that the new 3-4 provides. The boys have really gotten after it this preason. It looks like we have a little depth at those critical 3-4 positions too. I've been counting down the days and hours since their last game. Let's play some football already. GO PACK!!

QUOTE(#7):

Originally posted 02:14 PM ET  09.10 by GSH 1

Before you call someone out in a post you should have your facts straight, I only post here at fan nation and on a Bears Forum, I am a Bear Fan and have no reason nor have I ever troll posted on any Packer report or whatever it is. I don't know what your problem is but I bet it's hard to pronounce.

Hey GSH, I was just about to call you a legend and give props for getting booted off a Packers' board !! And what's the dealie with other fans posting on another team's board anyway ? I mean, I was guilty of that a couple of times after the Cutler trade, but I couldn't resist. Come to think of it, nah, the more the merrier ... I can't wait for the Banter on Monday ;o) After we trolley the cheeseheads that is. GO BEARS !!!!

QUOTE(#1):

Originally posted 07:38 PM ET  09.09 by Godsson_414

Im going with 31 to 17. Packers over Bears... just too much offense on the green and gold. Go Pack. The Bears still suck!

So does your mother. There's a reason the Fudge Pack went 6-10 last year, they are hapless. Bears 31 Fudge 17

Should be a close game Pack 24 Bears 21.

QUOTE(#10):

Originally posted 06:04 AM ET  09.11 by Chitownblues

So does your mother. There's a reason the Fudge Pack went 6-10 last year, they are hapless. Bears 31 Fudge 17

Sorry i didnt know the bears won the super bowl last year.... wow its a new year new scheme.... let it go buddy. and great mom joke..

You seem to be pretty hopeful, considering you beat the Bills, Browns and Cardinals in the preseason. Let the good times roll, I guess...

QUOTE(#12):

Originally posted 10:28 AM ET  09.11 by Godsson_414

Sorry i didnt know the bears won the super bowl last year.... wow its a new year new scheme.... let it go buddy. and great mom joke..

Neither did the weak ass packers, they had a losing season. They are so over rated for this season its ridiculous!

QUOTE(#14):

Originally posted 11:04 AM ET  09.11 by Chitown's Finest!

Neither did the weak ass packers, they had a losing season. They are so over rated for this season its ridiculous!

ur right we didnt thanks for stating the obvious considering he just said our record was 6-10...

QUOTE(#13):

Originally posted 10:34 AM ET  09.11 by Chomper Moose

You seem to be pretty hopeful, considering you beat the Bills, Browns and Cardinals in the preseason. Let the good times roll, I guess...

and yeah packer fans are pretty hopeful this year. but it doesnt have everything to do with preseason. its has to do with the fact that we have a new scheme on defense. we had a good draft, got players that can come in and make an impression. also our QB has a year under his belt and all those close games we lost (eight out of ten) we should pull out this year. so on those couple points yes we are hopeful.

The 2008 Packers showed us that they were a team with a lot of injuries, porous defense and a QB who couldn't bring his team back from a deficit as evidenced by Packers fans screaming that they lost 7 games by 4 points or less? Lets say they win all those close ones which would put them at 13-3.

The same could be said about the Bears- an injured secondary and d-line. They lost 3 games by 3 points or less. Say they win all those which would have put them at 12-4.

So.....the 13-3 Green Bay Packers host the 12-4 Chicago Bears in what should be a great game.....barring any injuries.

QUOTE(#17):

Originally posted 11:44 AM ET  09.11 by bleech89

The 2008 Packers showed us that they were a team with a lot of injuries, porous defense and a QB who couldn't bring his team back from a deficit as evidenced by Packers fans screaming that they lost 7 games by 4 points or less? Lets say they win all those close ones which would put them at 13-3.The same could be said about the Bears- an injured secondary and d-line. They lost 3 games by 3 points or less. Say they win all those which would have put them at 12-4.So.....the 13-3 Green Bay Packers host the 12-4 Chicago Bears in what should be a great game.....barring any injuries.

in a perfect world my man... i like it tho haha good post

Ah dont take it so hard GHS. After you posted the pic of Hawk, that's what made me ask. The guy posting as GHS over on PR did the same thing, called some people some names and got booted.

QUOTE(#19):

Originally posted 02:53 PM ET  09.11 by FMCH

Ah dont take it so hard GHS. After you posted the pic of Hawk, that's what made me ask. The guy posting as GHS over on PR did the same thing, called some people some names and got booted.

I am not taking it hard, just do not like being called out and accused of doing something I didn't do simple as that. There are a number of Bear Fans who use GSH or variations of the initials as their screen name in honor of the late great George Stanley Halas, It doesn't mean they are all the same person.