MMA  > General MMA  > My thoughts on Machida vs Shogun
October 25, 2009, 05:58 PM
I posted this in the other ufc 104 thread, but I thought I would make this its own post.

1. If I was a judge, I would have had a hard time scoring the fight.

2. Because of the Rampage/Griffen fight many people wanted a clear " if a title fight goes to a decision, you must CLEARLY beat the champion to earn that Decision ". While I think Shogun won the fight, you cannot say he clearly beat the champ.

3. The camera angles were bad. Every time shogun threw a kick he ate a punch to the face. Every time. It was hard to see from the camera angles we had.

4. Machida stuffed at least 3 take downs during the fight.

5. Shogun took the worse of the damage to his face and mid section, while Machida took his damage to his ribs and legs. Shogun has some visible whelts on his face when the fight ended.

6. I was suprised as all of you when the announced Machida as the winner. I thought Shogun took the belt for sure, but if you look at it HOW THE JUDGES DO, I can see WHY they picked machida.

Thats all I got for now.

PS: Didnt all of you guys cry about winning a fight because of leg kick points? What did shogun do besides body and leg kicks? Machida did just as much damage to shogun in his body than shogun did to machida. The only place Shogun wins in points is with his leg kicks.
October 25, 2009  06:24 PM ET

thank you. I was feeling alone here as the devils advocate.
People just jump too fast to conclusion IMO.

October 25, 2009  06:29 PM ET

Can you honestly take the champs belt away because of body and leg kicks?

I want hyped, Jim, and dallas all to tell me that the champ should LOSE HIS BELT because he got kicked in the legs and the body.

Come on guys. If this was a regular fight, yeah I would say Rua won, but you cant win the most coveted belt in mma with leg kicks.......

October 25, 2009  06:42 PM ET

woa!!! Hold up a sec...
I DO think that leg kicks should win the fight.
In Forrest & Rampage, this is exactly what won the fight for FG. But to win, he basically chopped Rampage's legs out.
Rua didn't do that.
Rua (IMO) barely won the matchup. and THAT, i think is what tipped the scale in his favor (when a round is close, judges tend to give it to the champ).
I don't say I agree with it, but it is what it is.

Me, myself, I had Rua winning 4x1. But I don't think it is a travesty like people are saying...

October 25, 2009  07:25 PM ET

So you are making the case that because he is the champion, he should recieve some sort of special treatment in the judging? This is the stupidist thread ever on fannation. So what must Shogun do to win the title? Is the decision automatically going to go to the defending champ? Why should this be judged and differently than any other contest? Shogun won that fight on almost all fronts. You have it backwards Unbeliever, Shogun was countering Lyoto's punches with low kicks, and it was working! He ate no hard shots and was never damaged by any of Lyoto's punches. And Shogun did more damage to his body too. Lyoto two knees and a handful of roundhouses to the body. Shogun landed more and more damaging body shots too. The jumping roundhouse early was definitly the most damaging fight of the round.

October 25, 2009  07:44 PM ET

I loved this fight. I think it was amazing. Rua had a great game plan for Lyoto and he executed it beautifully.

Everyone loves the underdog... and the best thing about this fight is the promise of a rematch. Lyoto obviously had the wrong gameplan for Rua, or Rua was just too good for Lyoto to implement it. Either way, I can't wait for the rematch and I hope that there's a finish rather than a decision.

October 25, 2009  07:55 PM ET
QUOTE(#4):

So you are making the case that because he is the champion, he should recieve some sort of special treatment in the judging? This is the stupidist thread ever on fannation. So what must Shogun do to win the title? Is the decision automatically going to go to the defending champ? Why should this be judged and differently than any other contest? Shogun won that fight on almost all fronts. You have it backwards Unbeliever, Shogun was countering Lyoto's punches with low kicks, and it was working! He ate no hard shots and was never damaged by any of Lyoto's punches. And Shogun did more damage to his body too. Lyoto two knees and a handful of roundhouses to the body. Shogun landed more and more damaging body shots too. The jumping roundhouse early was definitly the most damaging fight of the round.

did you even watch the fight? Machida hurt Rua twice in the fight.

Im not asking for special treatment. Work on your reading comprehention and try posting again with a real arguement.

October 25, 2009  08:58 PM ET
QUOTE(#2):

Can you honestly take the champs belt away because of body and leg kicks?I want hyped, Jim, and dallas all to tell me that the champ should LOSE HIS BELT because he got kicked in the legs and the body.Come on guys. If this was a regular fight, yeah I would say Rua won, but you cant win the most coveted belt in mma with leg kicks.......

You can't have different judging standards for different fighters or different fights. You can't say "leg kicks and body shots don't count because it's a title fight." Two fighters fought; one clearly outperformed the other.
You can honestly take the belt away from a champion who was clearly outfought. Whether that's from punches or **** footstomps, IT DOESN'T MATTER.

October 25, 2009  09:05 PM ET
QUOTE(#7):

You can't have different judging standards for different fighters or different fights. You can't say "leg kicks and body shots don't count because it's a title fight." Two fighters fought; one clearly outperformed the other.You can honestly take the belt away from a champion who was clearly outfought. Whether that's from punches or **** footstomps, IT DOESN'T MATTER.

And it doesn't matter "how badly" the champion is beaten, either. Seriously, how backwards is the thought process of, "well, the challenger won that round...but he didn't win by ENOUGH, so I think I'll score it for the champion?"

October 26, 2009  01:43 AM ET

machida landed more punches countered just as much as shogun and machida had a flurry but shogun caused more damage...it was a very close fight but for people to say the worst decision of all time is what i disagree with ....bisping vs hammill is still the worst

October 26, 2009  02:29 AM ET

Rua did not beat the champ, and therefore - lost the fight. And he got himself a re-match.

October 26, 2009  02:48 AM ET

I was surprised when Rua said he thought he should have won the fight and expecting to get the belt.
The judges decision was correct. The **** in Rua s corner thought the judges were just gona hand him the belt for POSSIBLE points advantage . . . . Does anybody really think Machida was gona get the belt from Rashad, had he (Machida) fought like Rua did?. . . . . . . I don't think so

October 26, 2009  07:46 AM ET
QUOTE(#11):

I was surprised when Rua said he thought he should have won the fight and expecting to get the belt. The judges decision was correct. The **** in Rua s corner thought the judges were just gona hand him the belt for POSSIBLE points advantage . . . . Does anybody really think Machida was gona get the belt from Rashad, had he (Machida) fought like Rua did?. . . . . . . I don't think so

I don't know what fight you watched. But I do know you're a Machida homer...

October 26, 2009  11:56 AM ET

UN. Shogun outstruck Machida almost every round. This isnt boxing and the commisions need to first off get rid of boxing judges for MMA fights. They need to train judges and what to look for in an MMA match. So, the judges know more than me, and everyone else on this planet about how to score that fight? How much money did you win on Machida? Seriously. People who are defending that decision are either blind by their love for Machida or just plain stupid.

October 26, 2009  12:16 PM ET

Again, I think Rua won the fight.

BUT I can see WHY the judges scored rounds for machida.

Machida landed WAY more strikes to the face.

Machida defended THREE takedowns

Machida had Rua in trouble twice

BOTH fighters took damage to their mid section, Machida taking the worst of it.

Again, I challenge anyone here at fannation to tell me how you can WIN THE BELT with leg kicks when your opponent left welts all over your face....

I was disappointed with machida, and was very comfortable with shogun taking the belt. I am, after all, a big fan of BOTH fighters, but if you look at the fight from the judges seat, and not the fans seat, the decision makes perfect sense.

October 26, 2009  12:26 PM ET
QUOTE(#14):

Again, I think Rua won the fight.BUT I can see WHY the judges scored rounds for machida.Machida landed WAY more strikes to the face.Machida defended THREE takedownsMachida had Rua in trouble twiceBOTH fighters took damage to their mid section, Machida taking the worst of it.Again, I challenge anyone here at fannation to tell me how you can WIN THE BELT with leg kicks when your opponent left welts all over your face....I was disappointed with machida, and was very comfortable with shogun taking the belt. I am, after all, a big fan of BOTH fighters, but if you look at the fight from the judges seat, and not the fans seat, the decision makes perfect sense.

It makes sense to boxing judges who dont know how to score an MMA match. I think Shogun landed 40 more strikes. So, you think a decision for a guy who was outstruck by 40 makes sense. Sorry, it doesnt. I dont rememeber Machida ever having Rua in trouble. Machida did almost next to nothing in that fight. The decision makes zero sense, and the commission needs to be held accountable.

October 26, 2009  12:32 PM ET
QUOTE(#15):

It makes sense to boxing judges who dont know how to score an MMA match. I think Shogun landed 40 more strikes. So, you think a decision for a guy who was outstruck by 40 makes sense. Sorry, it doesnt. I dont rememeber Machida ever having Rua in trouble. Machida did almost next to nothing in that fight. The decision makes zero sense, and the commission needs to be held accountable.

He left a HUGE welt on shoguns chest, and multiple hematomas on his face.

Thats a lot more than nothing.

UFC judges score takedown defenses highly, and Machida had three. They also take damage into account, and machida has less visible damage than shogun. Plain and simple.

October 26, 2009  12:33 PM ET

This is a perfect example on why you cant leave it for the judges.

Shogun in NO WAY tried to end the fight. He was content with kicking Machidas legs and body.

How can you give the belt to someone whos strategy was not to end the fight?

October 26, 2009  06:34 PM ET
QUOTE(#6):

did you even watch the fight? Machida hurt Rua twice in the fight.Im not asking for special treatment. Work on your reading comprehention and try posting again with a real arguement.

So what? Even if he hurt Shogun twice, that is moot. The UFC has chosen to operate under a ten point must system, not an ippon system like PRIDE's. Even if machida did do more damage, which he didn't, he still lost the majority of the rounds by being a complete coward. He is on his way out. His mystique has been shattered. He will never be able to beat even a decent striker at 205. Little Nog will crush him standing. So would any one willing to push him a little. He has no effective combinations because he leans so far back when he kicks. He also has very little power in his hands because his weight is always behind his feet. Think of what El Guapo would do to him...

October 26, 2009  06:36 PM ET
QUOTE(#17):

This is a perfect example on why you cant leave it for the judges.Shogun in NO WAY tried to end the fight. He was content with kicking Machidas legs and body.How can you give the belt to someone whos strategy was not to end the fight?

So you can't finish a fight with body shots and low kicks? Have you ever seen your avatar fight?

 
October 26, 2009  06:41 PM ET
QUOTE(#19):

So you can't finish a fight with body shots and low kicks? Have you ever seen your avatar fight?

Liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiver shot!

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


The Si.com Cover Hub Go to the Cover Hub

Stub Hub

The 2009 schedule has been released. Search for tickets!

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Cowher to Bears or Texans?
    Views
    60331
    Comments
    3100
  2. 2
    Yankees to cut down on spending
    Views
    6916
    Comments
    1159
  3. 3
    Disrespected Ryan takes dig at Moss
    Views
    9817
    Comments
    708
  4. 4
    Sources: Clausen punched outside bar
    Views
    22008
    Comments
    225
  5. 5
    D'Antoni still mad at Robinson
    Views
    6234
    Comments
    209

Most Active Users

Comments + Blog Posts + Throwdowns

  1. 1
    Chico 2.0
  2. 2
    BBK - Now it's all football
  3. 3
    rstowe
  4. 4
    gigi_iv
  5. 5
    Never NDing Struggle

Message Boards

  1. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    Longhorns vs. Aggies…
    Views
    292
    Replies
    58
  2. NFL > Cleveland Browns

    Cleveland Fail: Lions dump a…
    Views
    156
    Replies
    26
  3. NFL > Chicago Bears

    3rd Down...Can't get off the…
    Views
    116
    Replies
    18

Blogs

SI.com

Swimsuit

SI Photos