Wow.... Thats what the guy gets for punching the woman..... but now he will probably know who it was that punched him and he will sue Roger and win.....
QUOTE(#8):
Yup. Dude deserved it. You dont sucker punch people, especially women.
True and I agree, however this is America the land where everyone sues everyone for anything. I can see this guy Sueing Roger and winning a hefty sum!!!
Yeah but he got what he deserved an ass beating from a bellator fighter.
Was the guy and girl arguing before he sucker punched her? Or was it just outta the blue?
well de-****ing-zerved!
If this guys sues Huerta, I would award him money, then award him a $1.00
and then sue him for the same ammount he sued Huerta for hitting the girl from behind.
QUOTE(#12):
Was the guy and girl arguing before he sucker punched her? Or was it just outta the blue?
she had her back to him....shouldn't matter.
Total Comments (32928)
QUOTE(#5):
Wow.... Thats what the guy gets for punching the woman..... but now he will probably know who it was that punched him and he will sue Roger and win.....
No **** right, the fear if you're a trained fighter is to have a guy figure out who you are after he stomps your ass.
Total Comments (744)
QUOTE(#10):
Yup, which is ass backwards, but thats the society we live in today.
The American legal system is set up to protect the criminal! Hence, innocent unitl proven guilty, aka a really expensive lawyer uses charisma (alla Obama) to make a jury doubt a mans guilty verdict because a judge said that DNA evidence wasn't admissable due to some procedural error.
America has the worst court system ever. If you are found over a body with a bloody knife in your hand and DNA under the finger nails of the victim then you are guilty period. They don't get a trail, the judge should review the evidence and make a ruling so as not to waste MORE American tax dollars.
Total Comments (744)
QUOTE(#18):
The American legal system is set up to protect the criminal! Hence, innocent unitl proven guilty, aka a really expensive lawyer uses charisma (alla Obama) to make a jury doubt a mans guilty verdict because a judge said that DNA evidence wasn't admissable due to some procedural error. America has the worst court system ever. If you are found over a body with a bloody knife in your hand and DNA under the finger nails of the victim then you are guilty period. They don't get a trail, the judge should review the evidence and make a ruling so as not to waste MORE American tax dollars.
this is anywhere, not just here.
here you get more FRIVOLOUS ones. Like the thief who got stuck in a house garage and had to live by eating dog food & hot coke. he sued the guy for not having his garage door working properly. he got 1 million.
There's the women with the hot coffee from Mac Donnalds
There are so many examples, it is just ridiculous.
In Brazil, for example, we have a famous quote from a politician: "If you rob, don't steal petty money. robe millions. Because then, even if you get caught, you can pay for a great lawyer to bail you out".
The difference, is that in there the frivolous ones are laughed at, and they dont awars money to someone who can sue because they did something really dumb and noone protected him from his own stupidity.
QUOTE(#5):
Wow.... Thats what the guy gets for punching the woman..... but now he will probably know who it was that punched him and he will sue Roger and win.....
True, he can most likely sue roger. HOWEVER, facts are facts, you can can take as many eye-witnesses as you want but the fact is, the ONLY 100% proof they have is sketchy at best. You only see Roger give him one kick to the head and it's not that hard. For all we know, that guy tripped running backwards and knocked him self out or he was mobbed by the people he went running away from after he and Roger squared up. You know what the say about being in court...it's not what you know, it's what you can proof. From this video alone, there is NO proof that Roger's hands did the damage. Just one kick to the head after the guy was already down and out. Can he still win that, yes. But the final outcome will be much smaller than it could have been. Roger, no doubt, has a lot more money than that guy so he can afford the best representation who will no doubt hammer down this option. You see Roger squaring up but do you see Roger inflict all of the damage this guy received? Answer - No!
Comment
Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.
Truth & Rumors
MOST POPULAR
-
1
Howard considering five teams
- Views
- 15681
- Comments
- 1323
-
2
Why A-Rod's unloading his dream home for $30M
- Views
- 10720
- Comments
- 527
-
3
Why Tennessee's the problem in the SEC
- Views
- 2683
- Comments
- 138
-
4
Alvin Gentry interested in Clippers job
- Views
- 914
- Comments
- 116
-
5
Unnamed Jet: Team through with Sanchez
- Views
- 37517
- Comments
- 94


Chrissy Teigen
Eva De Goede and Ellen Hoog

