Message Boards

Or you could except the new rule, and move on.

While I agree something needs done for the hurry up offenses, I like not having the official in the middle, to many teams liked to use them in their routes to shield their W.R.'s from a defender, which is one reason why they were getting hit/run over and hurt.

QUOTE(#1):

Originally posted 09:39 AM ET  09.01 by BGDUECE

Or you could except the new rule, and move on.

NO!, in protest I will make the commish floss his teeth with MRS SHAMAN's back hair

QUOTE(#4):

Originally posted 11:24 AM ET  09.01 by GSH1

While I agree something needs done for the hurry up offenses, I like not having the official in the middle, to many teams liked to use them in their routes to shield their W.R.'s from a defender, which is one reason why they were getting hit/run over and hurt.

Also another interesting note I saw was that if he is back behind the QB (which makes it 2 officials now behind the QB), who the hell is now going to be keeping a close eye on the D-linemen for holding and all other crazy stuff they do? Now you have another guy watching the offense for penalties.

I officially object your objection. It is obviously clear that you are also bias in this in the fact that you are also retarTed. I would also like to point out that not all of us are as pathetic as you and have to troll around and point out grammer mistakes. Its football talk, get over it. But we can make a deal, you dont troll around telling anyone else how to spell, and I wont throw rocks at you while your turning tricks on the Vegas strip.

When are we going to all agree that we cannot all agree?

QUOTE(#10):

Originally posted 01:44 PM ET  09.01 by KikinYoAzz

I wont throw rocks at you while your turning tricks on the Vegas strip.

Hey we cleaned up the Strip, we sent all that crap downtown.

I think your idea of officials wearing helmet is a good one, so much so one has to ask "why don't they"?

Years ago they used to have steel poles for 1st down markers and someone (can't remember who it was, but he was famous) broke his leg on the sideline and it ended his career.
Now of course the poles are collapsible and the linemen are instructed to drop them if the play comes their way.

Agreed the new rule is going to suck, also agree with Sweet cakes as some words are very offending.

QUOTE:

Originally posted by

YOU'RE a lot more even tempered than I am, SweetCakes. You could have pointed out all the other mistakes, but you didn't. You could have pointed out the irony of such a post in which the OP could not successfully spell ****. Or you could have posted that this guy is obviously biasED. But you didn't. Good for you. I'm glad you took the high road and didn't say anything about apostrophes and capitalization and spelling. Your responses have that much more aUthority for your restraint. Good job.

HAHAHA, my bad guys. I was at work having a bad day. One idiot flushed her blackberry in the toilet, one ran his over with his mower another moron decided it was a good idea to rewire the video conference unit 10 min before an executive board meeting.

I never claimed to be an English professor or a spelling bee winner. I just like to talk about good football ideas.... So I vote that if people are going to criticize other people's grammer instead of talking about the subject at hand, then SI needs to build in a damn spell check...LOL

QUOTE(#17):

Originally posted 03:40 PM ET  09.01 by Hammered_in_Soup

Now of course the poles are collapsible and the linemen are instructed to drop them if the play comes their way.

From what I've seen, the chain gang are pretty collapsible, too.

QUOTE:

Originally posted by

Was there any "reasoning" behind the banning of helmets?

Only that it would cost an extra $.37 per helmet to make ponytail-friendly helmets.

QUOTE:

Originally posted by

I agree! LOL!

Finally, an agreement on FN?!