Message Boards

QUOTE:

Originally posted by

TROLL ALERT!!!!!

well.. they dont, lol

no one plays an easier schedule than them, its really a joke..

i know that is why i have wrote this blog

QUOTE(#3):

Originally posted 08:38 PM ET  09.22 by longhornsforlife

i know that is why i have wrote this blog

Cause no matter who shall make it and play boise .. bama, oregon, texas, ohio state, will just humiliate boise in the title game..

QUOTE:

Originally posted by

TROLL ALERT!!!!!

More like dupe alert.

He makes some good points, The BCS is a tough conference. But even the BCS does not have SEC speed.

If this is a dupe, kinda funny. If this is real VERY FUNNY.

QUOTE(#6):

Originally posted 10:26 PM ET  09.22 by THE Velvet Fogg

He makes some good points, The BCS is a tough conference. But even the BCS does not have SEC speed. If this is a dupe, kinda funny. If this is real VERY FUNNY.

The isn't no question he wonts be boring ... cause he can bearly spell.

not everyone is a good speller **** u don't Have to Spell good to get your point Across

QUOTE(#9):

Originally posted 12:04 AM ET  09.23 by TnerB57

Some signs of learning do help, though, if you want people to take your points seriously.

I think the kid is a smart feller.

The win over Virginia Tech is less impressive than wins over the rest of the WAC. The ACC is the worst conference in the country, to the extent that non-BCS conferences like MWC have had more BCS bowl wins than the ACC.

It will take the spectacularly mediocre Beavers to expose the Boise St. potato pickers for what they really are-- a lower tier Pac-10 wannabeave team. But what else would you expect from the toughest conference in College Football? It's a WAR in the Pac-10 week in and week out, and BSU is about to become just another casualty.

Alright you guys,
Troll, dupe, regular, whatever - who cares.
(none of us are who we claim to be anyway, or my name's
not Crazy Rabbit!)

This person brings up a good point.
Is this not 1 of the central issues in cfb today?
I mean the whole - Boise/schedule/depth/body of work/etc...

To me it all goes back to what I've stated earlier. I don't see why we need a NCG.
It's like we're trying to cram 4, or 5, or 6 really good teams all into 1 bowl game that only has room for 2. And then the winner is suddenly way better than the winners of the other bowls.

Anyway, all that being said, I think that iiiffff Boise does make it to the NCG it would be good for cfb.

Here's why:
- if they were to get blown out by 1 of the 'Big-Boys', then the
debate is over (at least for a few years).

- if they were to win, or play a close game, then yes, they are
deserving. end of discussion.

QUOTE:

Originally posted by

If the writers pick you #1and#2 all you have to do is win out .... your BCS title game was picked in August.

Best opinion I've read in a while.

The idea of 'ranking' teams before they even set foot on the field and then having those 'rankings' help determine the 2 'best teams' in Dec .... is nuts!

Oh...my....god. I can't...just CAN'T get beyond the grammar....

The ranks are the media and coaches. They mean NOTHING right now.

QUOTE(#8):

Originally posted 10:57 PM ET  09.22 by longhornsforlife

not everyone is a good speller **** u don't Have to Spell good to get your point Across

It's now the spelling. Your spelling is fine. Your syntax sucks.

I don't know if they deserve the ranking, they've played three games. Sure, their schedule may not be that tough, but I think you can make that argument about a lot of teams. THey can't help their conference or their schedule. Also, maybe the teams that are in the tougher conferences don't want to schedule games with teams like Boise State. They've only started making news recently, and schedules are made years in advance. I mean, think about it. Four years ago (let's say) do you really think a team on top, like USC, would have wanted a team like BSU? Sure they might think it's an easy win, but it makes their schedule look week.

I don't know. I am always the first one to make the "cupcake" argument when it comes to the PacTen and whatnot, but reality is, if a team is good, they are good.

QUOTE(#6):

Originally posted 10:26 PM ET  09.22 by THE Velvet Fogg

He makes some good points, The BCS is a tough conference. But even the BCS does not have SEC speed. If this is a dupe, kinda funny. If this is real VERY FUNNY.

Had to go back to re-read...didn't catch that first time....BCS conference....ha ha ha

QUOTE:

Originally posted by

BSU has won all of its games in convincing fashion. At this point in the season I don't see how TCU, Oregon or Nebraska could have leapfrogged the smurfs in the polls. By season's end, it will only matter for TCU. An undefeated AQ conference champ will end up ranked ahead of BSU, or TCU, or Utah. An undefeated BSU (and/or TCU and/or Utah) will probably be ranked ahead of a 1-loss AQ conference champ.And our dupe/troll/whatever needs to start sounding like someone smart enough to have met Texas' admittance requirements, or ****in' get "longhorn" out of his name. That level of grammatical prowess would be more typical of Okie Lite, Tech or Baylor. The profanity rules out Baylor.

There are a few Texas HS teams with Longhorn mascots right? That may be your answer.

QUOTE(#8):

Originally posted 10:57 PM ET  09.22 by longhornsforlife

not everyone is a good speller **** u don't Have to Spell good to get your point Across

Actually, you spelled "good" correctly, but I believe you meant to say, "You don't have to spell very well to get your point across."

I mean, if this is a shameless attempt to get people to read your stuff, you should have a fairly solid grasp of the written word.

If you're just bangin' out posts for **** and giggles, then have at dude.

QUOTE:

Originally posted by

BSU has won all of its games in convincing fashion.

im guessing you missed the BSu/va tech game this year, lol

hopefully oregon state will put this nonsense to rest, and also shove the fake "home win streak" up BSu's ****