Message Boards

NFL > General NFL > NFL's 100 Greatest Players.

Total Comments (470)

November 5, 2010, 05:31 PM

REPLY | QUOTE

I feel as though Jim Brown should have been no.1. I understand what Jerry Rice has done for the game. I know Rice has the numbers and more rings. But if you are a running back and you do what Mr. Brown has done I can't visualize Rice being better than him.

Jim Brown was fortunate to never be hurt. And he lead the league in rushing more than anyone ever will have. What are some thoughts on this?

Reply to Thread

Comments (4) Add A Comment

November 5, 2010 06:12 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

QUOTE:

Originally posted by

I don't know much about Jim Brown. He was before my time.And Top 100, 50, 20 or 5 or whatever players is so hard to say because one element can out weigh another to make you change your mind 1,000 times.I haven't even made my mind up as to what is more important when judging players success. Championships + Stats. Stats - Championships. Just stats?? I don't know!But I like Steve Young, Jerry Rice, Joe Montana, Ronnie Lott, Rodger Craig, and Bryant Young. In no specific order. hahaha

He was before my time as well. But I do know that he played at a very demanding position. I don't know the criteria either.

Perfectpats

Total Comments (470)

November 5, 2010 10:30 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

Yeah, it is.

Perfectpats

Total Comments (470)

Comment #6 has been removed

November 6, 2010 02:53 AM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

QUOTE(#6):

Originally posted 11:01 PM ET 11.05 by TnerB57

Jim Brown averaged over 100 yards a game for his career. He score 21 TDs his final season. He retired at the top of his game. He was an incredibly gifted athlete, and realistically the best football player ever.

You must also note his position. He was a running back. And the life span of a full back is short.