Message Boards

NFL > General NFL > Packers/Bears

January 3, 2011, 11:50 AM

REPLY | QUOTE

Now that was one of the best Packer/Bears games I have ever seen. A tough, defensive struggle. The Packers got some pressure on Cutler and pretty much shut down Olsen. It didn't look like Chicago was reaching deep down into their play book and neither were the Packers. That's probably one reason why it was a low scoring game. No injuries in this game and that's somewhat surprising, considering how hard those guys were hitting.

Reply to Thread

Comments (11) Add A Comment

Comment #1 has been removed

January 3, 2011 02:47 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

Congrads to the Packers and all there fans...

They will meet again...hopefully a different result.

BGDUECE

Total Comments (2517)

January 3, 2011 03:22 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

These are the best two teams in the NFC....if they take care of their business, we will see...kudos on the victory...

BGDUECE

Total Comments (2517)

Comment #10 has been removed

January 3, 2011 03:38 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

QUOTE:

Originally posted by

I don't think it's right for a team that goes 7 and 9, to get a home playoff game! But Seattle does! They should change the ruling so a division winner only gets a home game if they are at least 8 and 8.

That fails in logic. Win the division, play at home. What if a WC team is 12-4 and have to play at a division winner that is 10-6? Divisionaly winners are to be rewarded, not penalized.

Win TWINS!!!

Total Comments (69094)

January 3, 2011 03:42 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

QUOTE:

Originally posted by

I don't think a division winner that has a losing record should even be allowed to participate in the playoffs. They should exclude the Seahawks and let either the Giants in or the Bucs in.

Happy New Year, Shell!

I disagree. This is extremely rare, that a team with a losing record, makes the playoffs. So rare, that I think it has only occurred once before.

Win TWINS!!!

Total Comments (69094)

Comment #15 has been removed

January 3, 2011 03:52 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

QUOTE(#15):

Originally posted 03:45 PM ET 01.03 by Flea Biscuit

They are to be rewarded with a playoff birth mabey, but not home field advantage. After all the complaining this 7-9 Seahawk team has caused the big brains may end up changing the seeding for playoff teams. They should. The Saints seeded at no. 5? I don't think so.

Any given Sunday. For most teams, winning the Division comes first. After that, take your chances. May not be right, but it is what it is.

Win TWINS!!!

Total Comments (69094)

Comment #19 has been removed

January 3, 2011 08:38 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

Chicago's WR are still young, and they show it. Vets know when the ball will be picked off, and they fight for it to be knocked down. Hester didn't even put his hands up the last play of the game. Knox just watched as GB picked off the end zone pass, as well....

Wasn't a fan of the first Bears first red zone attempt when it was clear as day that Olsen was held and smothered in the end zone. We settled for 3.

Mannny

Total Comments (178)

January 4, 2011 10:40 AM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

QUOTE(#19):

Originally posted 07:26 PM ET 01.03 by Unknown Comic

Duece"These are the best two teams in the NFC.... if they take care of their business, we will see...kudos on the victory... "I still think the best two are the Saints and the Packers (when healthy). But anything can happen ... and probably will.

If the Saints and Bears were to play in New Orleans, the Bears could be in trouble.
The Saints are a dome team, and play like it

The Bears defense keeps them in the game, if Cutler does not turn the ball over, I think the Bears win easy, but that is a huge if.