NFL  > Chicago Bears  > Thank you Green Bay, Now come to Chicago to finish your season. Don't forget your hankies!!!
January 15, 2011, 11:26 PM
Don't give me the line that the Packers split the games this season with the Bears, If we had tried like we had the previous Eight games we wouldn't have had you to kick around on the 23rd of January!!! Honestly the Bears didn't really try no matter who played. I could see it and anyone who follows the Bears could see it too. They just didn't care enough to put a W up on the board this time. What ever that says about this team compared to the 85 Bears I'm not sure but one thing is for sure you won't see those Bears on the 23rd. The Bears you see will stomp the Packers so bad that the annoucers will be pulling out pillows for a nap. Go BEARS!!! Ps talk about confidence notice that this was typed BEFORE our SeaHawk Victory!!!
January 15, 2011  11:42 PM ET

You guys are 10 point favorites you know, Seadogs do blow on the road btw! Your Bears defense & special teams should be able to cover the number!

January 16, 2011  10:09 AM ET

You could leave out the last team there Brandy. lol.

January 16, 2011  10:18 AM ET

70 years, that's the record I've been rooting for all season to break. Just to prove that the NFC North is the best division in the NFL!!! Go BEARS!!!

January 16, 2011  10:21 AM ET

I'll say Bears by 10.

January 16, 2011  10:39 AM ET

How can anyone have watched that game and say that the Bears looked like they were into that game??? They just didn't look or play like they cared to me.

January 16, 2011  10:39 AM ET

Oh well we will see today and next week ok???

January 16, 2011  10:46 AM ET

WOW, WHAT A SHOCKER...a Bears fan saying Chicago WILL win. Please don't sound too biased. H*ll it almost sounds like you are saying DaBears just didn't show up in ALL of their lossed this year and had they just tried a little harded they would have finished 16-0.

Comment #12 has been removed
January 16, 2011  11:00 AM ET
QUOTE:

Its a huge loss in haters eyes, but if Chicago won that game the way GB did, the headlines would read "Bears eek out win vs a better team"

Haters will hate, regardless. Bears = Division champs, GB 2nd place....but I guess thats luck.

So beating the two preseason NFC favorites (Dal/GB), and then at the time, Philly, the best team in the NFC, along with the Jets the following week is all luck. I guess knocking Favre out of the game isn't luck, and lastly beating a lions team in Det in which GB lost to s luck as well

January 16, 2011  11:23 AM ET

I thought the Packers were buying tickets to Seattle?

January 16, 2011  11:34 AM ET

They wish 40yr.

January 16, 2011  11:40 AM ET

Sure they started their starters but their starters didn't seem to me to want to be out there. Just didn't have the same kind of fire they have had for the previous 8 games. Re-read Manny's comment #13. Thus we can assume everyone's either a Bear lover or Bear hater. That means there are more Bear haters than lovers since there are more teams right? You haters are going to hate the Bears even more the further we go in the Playoffs. Especially if we would win it all!!! The only thing I agree with you one BG is your last statement about Lovie and Angelo.

January 16, 2011  11:42 AM ET

Maybe in their minds they thought; "Hey we can beat the Packers anytime we want, to so if they beat everyone else we only have to beat them!!!" Just saying!!! lol.. You guys are tooo easy!!! Go BEARS!!!

Comment #21 has been removed
January 16, 2011  01:07 PM ET
QUOTE(#16):

They wish 40yr.

no we don't wish, we want the Bears. We'll play who we have to play. But true Packers and Bears fans want to play each other. We had the "Bears still suck" chant going down in Atlanta. So we'll take the Seahawks but its the Bears that we want.

January 16, 2011  01:54 PM ET
QUOTE(#21):

In Lovie's very first press conference as head coach took he said his number one priority was beating the Packers - not a Super Bowl win, not making the playoffs - BEATING THE PACKERS.

Coach Bellicheck's goal is winning the Super Bowl and not only focusing on one division rival. Maybe that's why we pounded the Bears in their crib this season. Brady made their defense look weak.

January 16, 2011  02:03 PM ET
QUOTE(#24):

no we don't wish, we want the Bears. We'll play who we have to play. But true Packers and Bears fans want to play each other. We had the "Bears still suck" chant going down in Atlanta. So we'll take the Seahawks but its the Bears that we want.

Who's we? Will you be suiting up for the game?

January 16, 2011  02:04 PM ET
QUOTE(#25):

Coach Bellicheck's goal is winning the Super Bowl and not only focusing on one division rival. Maybe that's why we pounded the Bears in their crib this season. Brady made their defense look weak.

Every team can be exposed....Just ask the Cleveland browns...right?

January 16, 2011  02:12 PM ET
QUOTE(#26):

Who's we? Will you be suiting up for the game?

well, i was using we as in we the fans...i'm pretty sure the packers players weren't chanting the bears still suck during the game...just sayin'..however that we'll play who we have to play does sound a bit weird...

funny how you don't mention your buddy bearsfan6522009 using the "we" in his post...maybe just a little hypocritical?

 
January 16, 2011  02:16 PM ET
QUOTE(#28):

well, i was using we as in we the fans...i'm pretty sure the packers players weren't chanting the bears still suck during the game...just sayin'..however that we'll play who we have to play does sound a bit weird...funny how you don't mention your buddy bearsfan6522009 using the "we" in his post...maybe just a little hypocritical?

That's b/c he is on the team....

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    'Melo wants to be wooed (like, Howard wooed)
    Views
    1783
    Comments
    1351
  2. 2
    Farrell defends Fenway's 'sleep room'
    Views
    1674
    Comments
    480
  3. 3
    Youthful Red Wings are rattled
    Views
    1780
    Comments
    291
  4. 4
    Bishop's severe injury
    Views
    2291
    Comments
    65
  5. 5
    Texans may take Clowney ... for someone else
    Views
    21813
    Comments
    64

SI.com

SI Photos