Message Boards

NHL > General NHL > weighted point system

Total Comments (3)

January 27, 2011, 02:23 PM

REPLY | QUOTE

here is an idea i have been mulling over, would like some other opinions on it: what about having a points system in the nhl where a team gets:

3 points for a victory over a team with more points than them
2 points for a victory over a team with an equal number of points than them
1 point for a victory over a team with less points than them
(The first game of the season would mean the winner of that game would get 2 points as both teams start at 0).

i think it would mean a more balanced scheule would have to be implemented.
the 'loser' point would have to go.
i'm not sure if such a system has been done in other leagues.
i'm sure there are disadvantages to awarding points in this manner and would like to hear of them.

thanks

Reply to Thread

Comments (2) Add A Comment

January 28, 2011 03:15 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

A flaw with this idea.
What if team A has played 3 more games then team B when they meet?
The main point you mentioned is the unbalanced schedule.Team A could have 70 points in their division,and have a 20 point cushion on the 2nd place team ,because that division is weak.
Team B could have 68 points in their division,but the 2nd place team has 67.3rd 65 and so on from a tougher division.

Go back to old school hockey-2 points for a win,1 point for a tie.Screw overtime,and the shootout.

I.M.O.

Total Comments (341)

February 3, 2011 10:59 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

i knew there was a flaw, thanks! i just feel there has to be a way to make the regular season games more meaningful, and maybe a different points system is a way. less games would be welcome too. but i agree, 2=win, 1=tie. i grew up with that!