A flaw with this idea.
What if team A has played 3 more games then team B when they meet?
The main point you mentioned is the unbalanced schedule.Team A could have 70 points in their division,and have a 20 point cushion on the 2nd place team ,because that division is weak.
Team B could have 68 points in their division,but the 2nd place team has 67.3rd 65 and so on from a tougher division.
Go back to old school hockey-2 points for a win,1 point for a tie.Screw overtime,and the shootout.
i knew there was a flaw, thanks! i just feel there has to be a way to make the regular season games more meaningful, and maybe a different points system is a way. less games would be welcome too. but i agree, 2=win, 1=tie. i grew up with that!
Total Comments (3)
Comment
Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.
Truth & Rumors
MOST POPULAR
-
1
Alvin Gentry interested in Clippers job
- Views
- 2468
- Comments
- 344
-
2
Adrian Peterson doesn't believe in gay marriage
- Views
- 1450
- Comments
- 77
-
3
Derek Brassard calls out Brad Marchand
- Views
- 4504
- Comments
- 58
-
4
Michael Vick challenges Colin Kaepernick, RGIII to race
- Views
- 914
- Comments
- 20
-
5
Miami-Florida rivalry losing TV luster?
- Views
- 4897
- Comments
- 18

Jessica Perez
Adaora

