NCAAF  > General NCAAF  > Do "Mega-commenters" bring down the quality of the boards?
January 21, 2009, 08:44 PM
I have recently noticed a lot of trouble between newer and less-commenting members and those I like to consider "Mega-commenters" on the NCAAF threads, or people who have contributed over 1200 comments. Sometimes these mega-commenters provide good, solid contributions, but at the same token, some of them think they can push less commented or learned members around with insults and to some degree threats. Sometimes they like to act as if they are minor moderators, and sometimes even to the point of pushing or driving others off the boards. And no, this is not the same thread as Urbanator's Around the Table rant. But really, do you feel the the Mega-commenters bring down the quality of the boards? Feel free to point out any that you think are guilty of abuse, or those who only make positive contributions. Also feel free to point out any users that you think are heading towards mega-commenter status and which side they fall into.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Howard considering five teams
    Views
    14117
    Comments
    1154
  2. 2
    Mavs shopping pick, eyeing Howard (and CP3)
    Views
    11066
    Comments
    925
  3. 3
    Donnie Baseball trying to get himself fired
    Views
    16207
    Comments
    607
  4. 4
    Why A-Rod's unloading his dream home for $30M
    Views
    8390
    Comments
    527
  5. 5
    Why Tennessee's the problem in the SEC
    Views
    2128
    Comments
    137

SI.com

Swimsuit

SI Photos