Total Comments (148)
Picks for the Packers were: #16, #63, #78, #89, #119, #157, #191, #192, #193, #228, #243
Total Comments (148)
This is assuming that everything happens the same way prior to GB's first pick...this is also taking in to consideration some needs that we had at the time.
Rd1 #16 Brandon Meriweather
Rd2 # 63 Tony Ugoh
#78 Buster Davis
#89 Tank Tyler
#119 Garrett Wolfe
#157 Steve Breaston
#191 Allen Barbre
#192 Le'Ron McClain
#193 Ben Patrick
#228 Mason Crosby
#243 Ahmad Bradshaw
Don't you just love hind sight.
And yes the players have had to be there by the time the packers pick.
Total Comments (148)
#16- Jon Beason, LB
#63- Brandon Mebane, DT
#78- Daymeion Hughes, CB
#89- Aaron Rouse, S
#119- Josh Beekman, OG
#157- Kevin Boss, TE
#191- Corey Hilliard, OT
#192-Courtney Taylor, WR
#193- Mason Crosby, K
#228- Brandon Siler, LB
#243- Ahmad Bradshaw, RB
Total Comments (148)
Mebane is great, Beason would hlep us with the 3-4 now, but even back then could have helped us. Hughes is an underrated corner, Rouse is a great backup. Beekman is better than Colledge, Spitz, or Sitton. Boss is a great all around TE. Crosby was a steal
Total Comments (148)
I looked at Mebane's numbers and didn't like what I saw compared to other DT's taken in that round. That's why I went with Ugoh in the second. I thought that the overall value favored the big tackle.
QUOTE(#7):
I looked at Mebane's numbers and didn't like what I saw compared to other DT's taken in that round. That's why I went with Ugoh in the second. I thought that the overall value favored the big tackle.
Ugoh was picked 2nd round #42(49ers traded to Colts), So Ugoh wouldn't be there at #63.
Total Comments (852)
I kind of assumed that the only picks that would affect anything would be the ones in the first round before Green Bay's pick. After that it's irrelevant because who can say that everyone else in the following rounds would pick who they picked prior to Green Bay. What you are saying is that we can only pick what is left after everyone else has picked in each round regardless of what happened in the first round.
QUOTE(#9):
I kind of assumed that the only picks that would affect anything would be the ones in the first round before Green Bay's pick. After that it's irrelevant because who can say that everyone else in the following rounds would pick who they picked prior to Green Bay. What you are saying is that we can only pick what is left after everyone else has picked in each round regardless of what happened in the first round.
yezzir
Total Comments (148)
Comment
Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.
Web's Best Blogs
-
Hugging Harold Reynolds
Tark the Shark
Photo: reviewjournal.com Las Vegas Review-Journal : "Basketball academy co-director,…
-
Watchdog
LeBron James dunketh, and he gets dunketh upon
It's the illicit video everyone was talking about before that other illicit video turned up. …
-
Pro Football Talk
Poppinga On Roster Bubble?
The generous contract Packers linebacker Brady Poppinga signed last offseason could put his roster…
Stub Hub
The 2009 schedule has been released. Search for tickets!
Truth & Rumors
MOST POPULAR
-
1
Ex-Eagle: Cowboys everything wrong about NFL
- Views
- 43325
- Comments
- 847
-
2
Mangini scaring off GM candidates?
- Views
- 18933
- Comments
- 160
-
3
Notre Dame commitment may enroll early
- Views
- 6086
- Comments
- 104
-
4
Friend: Cavs should fear LeBron leaving
- Views
- 6931
- Comments
- 87
-
5
What's wrong with Sosa's face?
- Views
- 76093
- Comments
- 79
Most Active Users
Comments + Blog Posts + Throwdowns
Message Boards
-
NCAAF > General NCAAF
CFB Game Day 11/7/2009
- Views
- 425
- Replies
- 122
-
NCAAF > General NCAAF
Sports Illustrated says Pac 10…
- Views
- 368
- Replies
- 74
-
NCAAF > General NCAAF
Iowa's loss was good for the…
- Views
- 348
- Replies
- 67



Jessica Gomes
Chelsey Buhler
