NFL  > Green Bay Packers  > 2006 Packer's RE-DRAFT
March 25, 2009, 03:30 PM
GOLDEN RULE #1- NO JUSTIN HARRELL!!!! lol

If you could do a re-draft of the 2006 (just the packer's selections/no trading picks) what would it look like?

Leave it on this thread.
March 25, 2009  03:31 PM ET

****MEANT 2007 Draft Sorry guys!

March 25, 2009  03:34 PM ET

Picks for the Packers were: #16, #63, #78, #89, #119, #157, #191, #192, #193, #228, #243

March 25, 2009  08:02 PM ET

This is assuming that everything happens the same way prior to GB's first pick...this is also taking in to consideration some needs that we had at the time.

Rd1 #16 Brandon Meriweather
Rd2 # 63 Tony Ugoh
#78 Buster Davis
#89 Tank Tyler
#119 Garrett Wolfe
#157 Steve Breaston
#191 Allen Barbre
#192 Le'Ron McClain
#193 Ben Patrick
#228 Mason Crosby
#243 Ahmad Bradshaw

Don't you just love hind sight.

March 26, 2009  09:33 AM ET

And yes the players have had to be there by the time the packers pick.

March 26, 2009  10:15 AM ET

#16- Jon Beason, LB
#63- Brandon Mebane, DT
#78- Daymeion Hughes, CB
#89- Aaron Rouse, S
#119- Josh Beekman, OG
#157- Kevin Boss, TE
#191- Corey Hilliard, OT
#192-Courtney Taylor, WR
#193- Mason Crosby, K
#228- Brandon Siler, LB
#243- Ahmad Bradshaw, RB

March 27, 2009  10:15 AM ET

Mebane is great, Beason would hlep us with the 3-4 now, but even back then could have helped us. Hughes is an underrated corner, Rouse is a great backup. Beekman is better than Colledge, Spitz, or Sitton. Boss is a great all around TE. Crosby was a steal

March 27, 2009  11:23 PM ET

I looked at Mebane's numbers and didn't like what I saw compared to other DT's taken in that round. That's why I went with Ugoh in the second. I thought that the overall value favored the big tackle.

March 27, 2009  11:44 PM ET
QUOTE(#7):

I looked at Mebane's numbers and didn't like what I saw compared to other DT's taken in that round. That's why I went with Ugoh in the second. I thought that the overall value favored the big tackle.

Ugoh was picked 2nd round #42(49ers traded to Colts), So Ugoh wouldn't be there at #63.

March 29, 2009  07:34 AM ET

I kind of assumed that the only picks that would affect anything would be the ones in the first round before Green Bay's pick. After that it's irrelevant because who can say that everyone else in the following rounds would pick who they picked prior to Green Bay. What you are saying is that we can only pick what is left after everyone else has picked in each round regardless of what happened in the first round.

 
March 30, 2009  09:10 AM ET
QUOTE(#9):

I kind of assumed that the only picks that would affect anything would be the ones in the first round before Green Bay's pick. After that it's irrelevant because who can say that everyone else in the following rounds would pick who they picked prior to Green Bay. What you are saying is that we can only pick what is left after everyone else has picked in each round regardless of what happened in the first round.

yezzir

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


The Si.com Cover Hub Go to the Cover Hub

Stub Hub

The 2009 schedule has been released. Search for tickets!

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Ex-Eagle: Cowboys everything wrong about NFL
    Views
    43325
    Comments
    847
  2. 2
    Mangini scaring off GM candidates?
    Views
    18933
    Comments
    160
  3. 3
    Notre Dame commitment may enroll early
    Views
    6086
    Comments
    104
  4. 4
    Friend: Cavs should fear LeBron leaving
    Views
    6931
    Comments
    87
  5. 5
    What's wrong with Sosa's face?
    Views
    76093
    Comments
    79

Most Active Users

Comments + Blog Posts + Throwdowns

  1. 1
    Porkins: F U to Hell, BCS
  2. 2
    RobertMenn: You stole my rake
  3. 3
    Perfectpats
  4. 4
    sign here
  5. 5
    Oso: Yankees win again?

Message Boards

  1. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    CFB Game Day 11/7/2009
    Views
    425
    Replies
    122
  2. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    Sports Illustrated says Pac 10…
    Views
    368
    Replies
    74
  3. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    Iowa's loss was good for the…
    Views
    348
    Replies
    67

Blogs