MLB  > General MLB  > Home Run Record 61 OR 73
June 1, 2009, 03:31 PM
The current HR king is Bonds with 73 but if a player were to hit 61+ (Maris' Record) HRs in the upcoming years and is a 'clean' player (no positive tests of steroids or HGH). Would any of you consider him the single season HR king or does he have to beat Bonds' 73.

I feel the MLB should seriously consider throw out the record of every player who has tested positive, admitted or been convicted of a steroid related offense. Also, if you test positive for steroids in your career, you are automatically ineligable to be in the HOF. I would be impressed if a player like Howard or Pena were to hit 64 HRs and i feel the media and fans should embrace him as the real HR King. I love baseball and was the first North American sport I player but it seems everytime baseball makes headlines now a days is for all the wrong reasons.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Clippers, Warriors exchange barbs
    Views
    718
    Comments
    431
  2. 2
    Time to penalize NHL's perennial losers?
    Views
    843
    Comments
    267
  3. 3
    Report: Raiders to release Terrelle Pryor on Monday
    Views
    1226
    Comments
    59
  4. 4
    Will NFL owners blackball Donald Trump?
    Views
    1024
    Comments
    54
  5. 5
    Packers lovers have own dating site
    Views
    940
    Comments
    43

SI.com

SI Photos