donavan mcCRAPP for number 5? Are you kidding me--- what MORON said this???

this is proof that all you need to work for sports illustrated is being an idiot wrapped in a Moron... Hire the handicapped-- mentally handicapped././/

How #78 is not the all time sack leader is beyond me. Bruce played in a 3-4 as an end. Consequently, he was double teamed every single play. Reggie and Deacon played a 4-3 end on the edge.

Not a bad list, but you whiffed on #5. Paul Hornung won how many Super Bowls with the Packers?

George Rodgers at #38 over Arnie Herber? An average running back with no league titles over a hall-of-famer with 4 titles??? Arnie Herber, along with Don Hutson CHANGED THE GAME.

An FYI for The Yaks: Rickey Jackson is on the list at worthy of consideration. Think you saw an early version before updated. Feel free to comment again. Thx.

pretty good...but randy moss is probably a top 3 receiver of all time, gotta go wth him in front of sharpes

Looks like this list was created by a cowboys fan. Lets be serious....Deion over LT? Aikman over Steve Young? Give me a break.

# 37 - Pat Fischer - CB (Cardinals, Redskins). Tough cover and force man. Several Pro Bowls.
He should have at least been considered.

Otto Graham twice? #14 should have gone to Don Hutson.....in the "3 yards and a cloud of dust" era, this guy hauled in 99 career TDs. Hutson revolutionized the position, and many Packer fans would choose him as the greatest player in team history. He wasn't even SIs runner-up!

Tom Brady should be no higher than 5th. Bradshaw, Griese, Namath and Staubach were all better.

# 64.. should have been Dave Wilcox, the intimadator, he's not even mentioned.. hall of famer

Brian Sipe not even worthy of consideration for #17?!?

# 32 - Jack Pardee (LB) - Rams, Redskins - Another multi-time Pro Bowler like Fischer.
I know # 32 is a tough list to crack with all those RB's, but Jack Tatum and John L.Williams before Pardee? geez!

Marshall Faulk over darell Greene. C'mon.

Deacon Jones over Mean Joe. Never

You lost credibility at #14 when Dan Fouts was omitted.

You lost credibility at #14 when you omitted Dan Fouts.

The list seems to favor the modern era in many respects, pure stats over real performance. Today's game is more stat driven and easily defined by them, the pre 1970's NFL was more about helping your team win.

I stopped reading this when i saw michael vick was worthy of consideration for number 7. Wow.. I thought it was greatest players from 0 to 49.. not average players with average stats.

A lot of Buffalo Bills really got screwed on this list. I'll give you a lot of guys over Kelly and Walter Payton over Thurman but I don't see Munoz over Bruce Smith, Simeon Rice over Biscuit or Youngblood over Andre Reed. I know that the Bills didn't win Super Bowls but neither did Marino and he was picked over Kurt Warner and he could NEVER touch the Bills come January.