THREE DOLLAR BILL, Y'ALL won the Throwdown.
Throwndowns: 14
Record: 6 - 8 - 0
Polk City , FL
All Throwdowns
14
Votes
Throwndowns: 1
Record: 1 - 0 - 0
Austin, TX
All Throwdowns
15
Votes

Too Many Rules Protecting NFL Quarterbacks


I beleive the NFL QB's are protected to extensively with too many rules and this degrades the game sometimes.


The rules that are in place are there to protect the investments of the team and the enjoyment of the fans.

Fans, especially casual fans, enjoy seeing high-scoring, pass heavy games more than low-scoring, defensive battles. The proof is in the ratings. The highest rated NFL game in 2007 was the Patriots/Colts in November; a game featuring two of the best QBs playing today. The ten most watched games in 2007 featured either the Patriots, Cowboys, Saints or the Packers, which happen to be the four teams that led the passing category (regular season) for 2007.

As the face of the teams they represent and of the NFL itself, it is in the NFLs best interest to see that these guys remain upright for as many games as possible. Fewere people are likely to buy tickets to a Pats game if Brady is in street clothes, and advetisers aren't going to shell out the dough if they know the ratings are not going to be there. A QB who has a brilliant but short career will put fewer butts in the seats and sell fewer jerseys. And with revenue sharing spreading the profits from TV contracts, fewer marquee QBs is bad news for the whole league, even if your team favors the defensive side of the ball.


I beleive that they are to protect the investments of the team, but i also think that if they are a player on the field they should be suceptable to getting hit just like everyone else. There are to many game changing penalties because someone falls and bumps a QB's knee. If you deliberatly put your head down and hit him helmet to helmet when you can clearly miss him, than of course you should be flagged.But other than that if he throws the ball and is standing there 2 seconds after the ball is thrown he can be counted as an active member on the field or a blocker and has every right to be contacted. It takes away from the game when you know you can bust through the lineand run someone over because of fear for a 15 yard penalty.


Rules are implemented for good reasons & usually address an existing problem that has hit a boiling point (horse collar tackle). The problem with receiving a game changing penalty for a questionable call lies not in the rule, but in the interpretation by the refs who misinterpret the intent of the action.

As a fan, how much do you want to see a Superbowl decided by attrition at the QB position? Do you really want to see Sorgi vs Cassell? In the purest sense, this would show how good a team's depth is and who is the better 'overall' team beyond a team's superstars, but do you really want to pay to see a team without its superstars? Imagine showing up for a U2 concert to find out that Bono won't be taking the stage.

QBs are not the only players on the field being protected by rules. Defensive lineman are protected from the chop block and many are seeking to eliminate the cut block altogether. Just because teams of the past got along fine without todays rules protecting players doesn't mean the rules aren't necessary in this era. Ask the players of the past if they would liked to have played under rules that could have prevented their careers from being cut short.


They may not be the only ones protected, but they are the most protected. I watch alot of games with some ridiculous rounging the passer calls, I see alot of players being blocked and on the way to the ground being pushed into the QB's knees and then a flag getting thrown because of it. I watched a game not to long ago where tom brady as he was throwing the ball got hit and stummbeled, then nice and gracefully over exaggerated it and fell to the ground into a limp pile, now i got to give it to him it was great acting with the whole flop down and it got the penalty he wanted.

I just think too many games are decided by stupid penalties like roughing the passer because if you are tied close to the end of the game and the other team has the ball your number one priority is to come through the line full blast looking to kill and you hit the QB the wrong way and there goes the game for you.


As they are more exposed/at risk than the average player, they are afforded more protection from career-ending injuries. The rules are clear & sound. It is up to the referee to call the game fairly & consistently throughout the game. It is when the refs fail to do this that these 'subjective' calls have the potential to affect the game. But these penalties are no more subjective or game-changing than pass interference calls, holding calls, or infractions that are called away from the ball and have no bearing on the play itself. The rules are not the problem.

Without these rules, instead of the occasional penalty for rougher the passer, you would see linemen legally going for the knees of quarterbacks on every play & more QBs being carted off the field. Games w/ poor QB play limits the type of action that the ratings say the average viewer wants. In the end, the NFL's goal is to serve up games with marquee names that will generate ticket & jersey sales, while bringing in the largest TV audience. The NFL will not let revenue slip because of a problem that is so easily remedied by a few rules that not only benefit themselves and the fans, but the health of the players as well.

I can almost hear my father grumbling, "Why don't you just put a dress on him..."

Report Offensive Comment

Or my grandpa yelling "Rip his fkn head off!!!" while we all try to quickly and quietly eat our Thanksgiving dinner.

Report Offensive Comment

I agree but its a necessary evil. The QB play in the NFL is already down. If we lose many more good ones than the game will become unwatchable. Bad QB play would kill the sport.

Report Offensive Comment

My grandpa always screams "Stomp on his throat".

Report Offensive Comment

Yeah my grandpa screams lots of things, most not quite appropriate for the internet. Which is pretty shocking.

Report Offensive Comment

This is football not dance recital. same rules for everyone on the field.

Report Offensive Comment

I favor rules protecting guys who, as a result of their positional requirements, are unprotected. QBs, Ks, and Ps are all more vulnerable while executing plays than are those in other positions.

That said, the rules have gotten pretty ridiculous. Linemen are almost afraid to touch the QB at all lest they run the risk of 15 yards.

Report Offensive Comment

Make a longer argument so I can vote for you.

Report Offensive Comment

it has gotten way out of hand...after the QB is **pushed** down he looks up for a flag...come on..qbs in the 70's and 80's would get creamed and not even look for a flag...

Report Offensive Comment

The fault for that lies in the quarterback, not the rules.

Report Offensive Comment

The rules have gotten a bit too protective of QBs...I can understand hits to the head, but sometimes a D-lineman knicks the QB's helmet with his hand and its a 15 yarder. The 2 step rule is a bit absurd too and a guy running full speed at a QB can't sudddenly stop his momentum or change directions to avoid a QB hit at times.

I think some reasonable judgment should be given to the backfield ref to judge a blatantly late hit and not a late hit.

Report Offensive Comment

The fault lies in the freaking owners giving the QB's so much money they have to protect them from harm so they can get their investment return.

Report Offensive Comment

Its gotten so bad that if a QB can do a somewhat convincing acting job, they can get a flag called on them.

Report Offensive Comment

Again, the problem is not with the rule. The quarterback of your team is probably still playing because of this rule. Referees need to do a better job of catching flops, and QBs need to man-up and take the few hits they do receive.

But the rule is working and is in place for a good reason.

Report Offensive Comment
 

From the NFL Rules Digest (on protecting QBs)
3. No defensive player may run into a passer of a legal forward pass after the ball has left his hand (15 yards). The Referee must determine whether opponent had a reasonable chance to stop his momentum during an attempt to block the pass or tackle the passer while he still had the ball.

This squarely places the responsibility of 'questionable' calls on the referees.

Report Offensive Comment

Add a comment

Remember to keep it clean. Bad words will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed. More Guidelines


or cancel