Throwdowns > Completed

Views
12
Comments
22
  • June 05, 2008 08:02 PM ET

Is John Smoltz a Hall of Famer?

16
Votes
8
Votes
16
Votes
8
Votes


After it was announced yesterday that John Smoltz would undergo season ending shoulder surgery, I started thinking about his hall of fame legacy and if he will be inducted into Cooperstown.

My answer to that question is yes. I think when he does decide to hang them up that he will be a hall of famer. He is the only pitcher to have over 200 wins and be able to record over 150 saves. Not to mention he is also a member of the 3000 strike out club. He is also one of the best postseason pitchers of all time with a career record of 15-4 with a 2.65 E.RA.

Then you take a look at his awards. He was the 1992 NLCS MVP, the 1996 NL Cy Young, 2002 NL relief pitcher of the year, 2005 Lou Gehrig Memorial award, 2005 Roberto Clemente award, 2007 Branch Rickey award.

You look at his stats and his awards and that all adds up to a hall of fame career in my opinion. Hearing what Tim Kurkjian said last night made me believe that he would be a hall of famer. Kurkjian has a hall of fame vote and he said that on the first ballot he would vote for Smoltz


The baseball Hall of Fame is probably the hardest of the pro sports to crack. It just is not the Hall of the very good - which Smoltzy is. The real strikes (get it) against him is the quality of pitching that existed during his career. If you just look at his famed teammates alone, could you really say he was better than Maddux and Glavine? Was he better than The Big Unit? Or Clemens (steroids or not)? My answer to all of those is simply no. The Hall voters will take all of that into consideration. Certainly not all the good pitchers of that generation will get in. The numbers are against him. He didn't have a monster total of wins (even if 300 is no longer the benchmark) or of saves ( a stopgap role until his arm was all the way back).

John Smoltz was/is a very good pitcher, not a Hall of Famer.


John Smoltz has had a great career in Atlanta and embraced any role they put him in. Wherever the Braves have needed him he has been fine with taking that role. The Braves needed a reliever this year and he was going to come back as a reliever instead of a starter, even though he was capable of still being a starter.

Smoltz is the only player to record 200 wins and 150 saves. Not only was he one of the best pitchers in the majors when he was a starter, when he went to the bullpen he was one of the best closers in the game.

He has been an absolute dominant pitcher no matter where the Braves have had him. Another thing that adds to his Hall of fame is his postseason play. He is arguably one of the best postseason pitchers of all time.

Also you said that he didn't have a monster total of wins. If he wouldn't have been in the bullpen and without injuries he would be pretty close to 300 wins right now. Say you add 70 more wins to his total and he is at 280 wins and coming back after his surgery to go after 300 wins.

Another measuring point to pitchers is Strikeouts. He has over 3000 which is the # pitchers aim for. Out of room more to come


Pitchers from this era with more wins (sorry, about #'s..might not be up to exact day this year):
Clemens - 354
Maddux - 350
Glavine - 305
Randy Johnson - 288
Mussina - 259
Wells - 239
Moyer - 239
Schilling - 215
Kenny Rogers - 214
Pedro - 210 and counting

K's
Johnson - 4681
Clemens - 4672
Maddux - 3311
Schilling - 3116
Pedro - 3031

And those are just his contemporaries. If you consider guys from the past, there are PLENTY of pitchers with better stats who are not in the Hall. If you were to name the top five starters and top five relievers of his era, Smoltz would not make either list. That's not enough to make him Hall-worthy. He was very good as a starter and a very good reliever, but not an all time great at either, and that's what the Hall of Fame is for.


If you look at the pitchers you listed wins list I would list Smoltz in 5th place behind Randy Johnson. He was only reliver for a few years and he still was able to record 154 saves. 3000 strikeouts is the mark that pitchers aim for kind of like the 3000 hit club that pretty much ensures a hall of fame.

I see Smoltz getting into the hall of fame on the first ballot. He has had a great career and I dont see him missing out on the hall of fame. He has a Cy Young award and a relief pitcher of the year award. That shows that not only was he one of the best starting pitchers of this era, but one of the best relievers when he had the oppurtuinity.

If Smoltz would have spend the last four years in the bullpen then now he would have over 300 saves which would be enough to be a hall of famer. He is one of the most versatile pitchers in the history of the game, its not usual for somebody to be so dominant as a starter and then go to the bullpen and be the best closer in the game. John Smoltz is a hall of famer.


If I tell you Rick Ankiel is the ONLY major league player with both an 11 win season and an 11 homer season, does that make him a Hall of Famer?

Let's not forget why Smoltz went to the pen in the first place. He had a string of injuries and had become ineffective as a starter. If anything, the stretch in the pen prolonged his career.

Don't use ESPN-factoids. Voters look at contemporaries like ALL the pitchers above. Instead of citing one 20 win season (Doug Drabek, anyone?), go down a notch and look at how many seasons with more than 15 wins...Smoltz has exactly, um...2. ALL of the pitchers above have more - even the great Jamie Moyer. How about wins vs. losses? Smoltz stands at 210 and 147, a career % of about .59. ALL of the above pitchers have a better win percentage (except Moyer, who trails slightly at .57).

He wasn't even the best pitcher on his own team. Not even 2nd. Glavine and Maddux had more wins, fewer losses, and yes, more Cy's. If you want to put pitchers of the era in, Clemens (7 Cy's) , Big Unit (5), Maddux (4), Pedro (3), Glavine (2). Five pitchers from one era are a lot for the Hall. Smoltz drops to the second tier. Very good - not HOF.

June 5, 2008  08:14 PM ET

oops never mind thought you were going to say no so I grabbed it real quick. he is so you should win this one good luck

June 5, 2008  11:06 PM ET

definite first ballot hall of famer!

June 5, 2008  11:08 PM ET

when I did this I was accused of an easy win, so yes he will defiantly be in, every eligible pitcher besides Blylevin with 3000 K's is in, and will be in a few years, and Smoltz is the only player with 200 wins and 150 saves.

June 5, 2008  11:20 PM ET

this in no case an easy win. If it wasn't debatable then why would they be debating it on sportscenter and other ESPN shows

June 5, 2008  11:33 PM ET

thats what I said, but I won anyways

June 6, 2008  12:47 AM ET

The general standard Hall voters use is could he be considered the best at what he did for a long period of time. The answer is no. Ther are simply too many quality pitchers out there. The fact that he went to the pen for those years does not help his cause. He didn't get enough saves to be a factor - like Eck. There are plenty of pitchers with comparable numbers not in the Hall.

June 6, 2008  12:53 AM ET

Smoltz was a much better pitcher then Eck.

June 6, 2008  01:04 AM ET

Smoltz was a much better STARTER than Eck. I think I have to go with Eck in the relief dept.

June 6, 2008  01:14 AM ET

smoltz = 1st ballot

June 6, 2008  01:19 AM ET

1st ballot??? Insanity. Really...I'll bet you everything I wn on that.

June 6, 2008  01:35 AM ET

Smoltz actually has a lower ERA and WHIP then Eck as a reliever. Eckersley was an inferior pitcher to Smoltz. Smoltz has a lower career ERA and WHIP despite starting more games and pitching in the steroid era. Besides, a team should never pick a great reliever over a great starter unless the reliever's name is Mariano Rivera.

June 6, 2008  06:57 AM ET

welcome back TFo!

June 6, 2008  08:29 AM ET

thanx rstowe - good to be back.

June 6, 2008  09:20 AM ET

Smoltz has 210 wins and 3000 strikeouts and 154 saves, he's in

June 6, 2008  09:24 AM ET

"what about Bert Blyleven he never got the call."

he still has a few years of trying left, and his votes have gone up every year

June 6, 2008  10:18 AM ET

t-fo check your stats smoltz had 6 15+ win seasons.
92- 15
93- 15
96- 24
97- 15
98- 17
06- 16

June 6, 2008  10:28 AM ET

I missed 2006 as a MORE than 15 win season - my bad. 15 wins even wasn't part of the equation.

June 6, 2008  11:13 AM ET

I will TD anyone who says Smoltz isn't a HOFer and I will win, anyone who thinks otherwise is obviously a Mets or Philly's fan

June 6, 2008  11:35 AM ET

He'll cruise into the Hall of Fame.

 
June 6, 2008  11:44 AM ET

If Smoltz isn't in neither is Pedro, Pedro has the same number of wins, only 24 more K's and zero saves

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Leaderboard

  Fan W L T Win %
1 DetroitFan* BS: Start Stanton! 132 9 7 91.6%
2 Porkins 138 13 1 91.1%
3 Baun-ded=PUCKHEAD 54 5 1 90.8%
4 The Ram 139 17 4 88.1%
5 Foosball 70 9 2 87.7%
6 Philly-- www.sportsnoise.com 74 11 4 85.4%
7 Hyped78 116 19 5 84.6%
8 Dookie: Here We Go Steelers 117 19 8 84.0%
9 [The] Coach 97 18 5 82.9%
10 BSchwartz07 129 27 6 81.5%

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Dodgers hitters wanted payback
    Views
    4020
    Comments
    848
  2. 2
    Dolphins, Lions shopping players
    Views
    37291
    Comments
    134
  3. 3
    Photos escalate Harvick-Edwards fight
    Views
    1665
    Comments
    73
  4. 4
    Kobe: Gold medal better than NBA title
    Views
    7381
    Comments
    65
  5. 5
    What's wrong with Beckett?
    Views
    4196
    Comments
    55

Weekly Most Active Users

Comments + Blog Posts + Throwdowns

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9

Message Boards

  1. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    Big Ten - Changing of the…
    Views
    394
    Replies
    22
  2. MMA > Fight Club

    'Rampage' ready to return?
    Views
    246
    Replies
    5
  3. MMA > Fight Club

    EliteXC fighters overshadowed…
    Views
    154
    Replies
    3

Blogs