FanNation - The Republic of Sport

Bigdleech said 06/11, 08:06 PM
Of course their defense is good, but that won't win eight or more games for them. The offense will simply struggle too much for them to compete.

So what if they have three quarterbacks with some form of talent. Joe Flacco should be starting by the end of the year, but he is a rookie. He will need time to develop, especially considering that he never played the most elite competition in college. Troy Smith is mobile, but he definately is nothing special as a quarterback, and not of starter quality. I don't think anything has to be said about Kyle Boller, clearly one of the biggest quarterback busts since the start of the decade. Not one of these men is fit to lead this team to a .500 record this year.

Cam Cameron is a top notch offensive mind, but he had much more going for him in San Diego. Drew Brees is a very good quarterback without Cameron, and LT would go down as one of the greatest running backs of all time without Cameron. Ronnie Brown was very good anyway, Cameron didn't exactly make him any better. McGahee is a good running back, but he is nothing compared to LT. Plus, there is nothing special about the line either.

You can't succeed with a terrible quarterback.

Bigdleech said 06/11, 08:39 PM
Where do I call the line horrible? I said it was nothing special. That said:

The Ravens quarterback situation isn't good right now. They clearly don't think Troy Smith is good enough to be a starter in the league, because they traded back into the first round to get Flacco. Flacco has great upside, but that doesn't mean a thing this year. He will not start all season as a rookie. How many quarterbacks can come in and be successful right away? Other than Big Ben, I can't think of a single person. And a lot of his success was owed to the running game and receivers. Flacco could become a Pro Bowl quarterback, but he definately won't be one in his first season.

McGahee is probably a top ten running back, but he will never be a top five back. In his four seasons, during which he has called himself the best running back in the league, he has never averaged over 4.1 yards per carry in a season.

Heap is a pretty good tight end, I have to give you that. But Derrick Mason is by no means a great target. There are maybe five great targets at wide receiver in the division, and he is definately not one of them.

The division is great, and they will struggle against those other teams.

Bigdleech said 06/11, 09:13 PM
Again, Mason isn't a bad receiver, but he isn't great either. Of course he caught a ton of balls. Heap was injured for most of the season last year, so Mason was really the only person capable of catching the ball on the team.

Let's take a look at the other teams in the division. Willie Parker now doesn't have to carry the load, and he only busted up his ankle. It's not like he injured his knee. The team was plagued by injuries, and Faneca didn't look like he cared that much anyway.

The Bengals defense isn't good, but they still have one of the best quarterbacks in the league, and arguably the best receiving tandom.

I see DA, not the Browns, as a one hit wonder. They have a very good line and, receiving corp, and tight end. They improved on the d-line, and they have one of the best return men in the league.

Plus, they have to play the toughest NFC division, the NFC East.

Again, Ronnie Brown is a better running back than McGahee.

And, whether people believe it or not, Brian Billick was a pretty good offensive mind himself. Just look at what he did when he took over offensive responsibilities in his first year with McNair.