Throwdowns > Completed

Views
15
Comments
53
  • July 01, 2008 08:44 AM ET

The most under-rated defensive player in MLB, ALL TIME.

[The] Coach (97-18-5) vs rstowe (224-66-17)
9
Votes
11
Votes
9
Votes
11
Votes


Everyone knows about his gambling problems and eventual ban from baseball and the Hall of Fame. They also know that he is the all time hits leader with 4256. What few people know about Charlie Hustle is that he was also a very good with the glove.

My choice for most under-rated defensive player in MLB history is Pete Rose.

He won two gold gloves in 1969 and 1970 as an outfielder, playing left, right and center at times.
Was an all star at a record 5 different positions. (RF/LF/2B/3B/1B)

I have more information but I will wait to see your choice!


My choice is Willie Randolph.

Zero Gold Gloves won even though when he retired he was 5th in total games played at 2B, 9th in putouts, 7th in assists, 8th in total chances and 3rd in double plays. Over a 18 year career he committed 234 errors at 2B out of 11,429 chances for a fielding % at 2B of .980.


I knew you would be original, I love debating baseball with you buddy!

Willie Randolph is a great choice and I always believed he was a good second baseman. Rose however was always known for other things such as hits, hussle and enthusiasm to name a few but NOBODY ever mentioned his defense.

Compare:
Randolph - 18 yrs, 2153 games, 11435 Chances, 237 Errors, .979 Fld%

Rose - 24 yrs, 3528 games, 15956 Chances, 213 Errors, .987 Fld%

Facts:
1. Rose had 24 less errors in 1375 more games and 4521 more chances.

2. Rose was asked to learn 6 different positions in his career including all three outfiled positions, first, second and third, while Randolph spent nearly all of his 18 seasons at second.

3. Pete Rose Career Fielding percentage of .987 is the higher than any of the players mentioned in the comments that didn't play first base.
Keep in mind, those guys were known for their defense while Rose was not. Rose also played more games and had more chances than any of them.

Biggio, .985
Ripken, .977
Maddux .970
B. Robinson, .971

More games, more chances to make an error and yet less errors.

Who'd a thunk it?


At least Rose did win 2 gold gloves...so the voters did recognize him as a good/great fielder. Randolph never won the gold glove ever....here are the guys who won the gold glove in the AL during Willie's playing career:

Bobby Grich
Frank White
Lou Whitaker
Harold Reynolds
Roberto Alomar

Willie has a better fielding % for his career than Reynolds, the rest are all at .984 for their fielding at 2B only (Willie's 2B fielding % was .980). Willie played in more seasons than Reynolds, Grich and Alomar, same seasons as White (Willie had more chances and only a .004 difference in fielding %) and 1 less season than Whitaker.

When you think of Randolph - you really don't think of anything when it comes to his playing days except for playing on the Yankees.

His final stats of 5th in total games played at 2B, 9th in putouts, 7th in assists, 8th in total chances and 3rd in double plays yet not 1 Gold Glove really does mean he was underrated as a gold glover.

It is hard to compare an outfielder/corner infielder to a 2b when it comes to D, but at least Rose has those gold gloves (fans today may not realize he had a glove back then but at least the voters did).


You don't have to convince me that Willie Randolph was a good defensive 2nd baseman, I agree with you.

While he never recieved a gold glove in his career, that had more to do with the quality of players playing his position at the time than any personal slight to Willie by voters. You yourself pointed out that he was competing with White, Whitaker, Grich and Alomar. That is some pretty hefty competition. YOU also pointed out that those four players owned better fielding percentages than did Randolph so it stands to reason they would be getting those gold gloves.

I am not saying that Rose was a better defensive player than Randolph. Randolph, regardless of his lack of gold gloves was known as a very good defensive second baseman, just a notch below those you mentioned. Randolph can't be really be "under-rated." His ability is recognized even without the hardware.

N-O-B-O-D-Y ever thinks of Rose in terms of defense. While he wasn't the best in the league at any of the positions he played, he still played them well and his versatility was an asset to his manager. You wouldn't find the word "defense" anywhere on his plaque in the HOF, IF he were ever to recieve one! ONLY 4256!


That's the thing about this TD....I remember Rose and his defense and so do you....so what should we consider underrated for the purposes of this TD?

I consider never winning the gold glove as one way...no matter the competition. Rose had competition as well at each posiiton and still managed to win a couple.

This is tough, we both made excellent points, so it really does come down to what you would consider underrated - for Rose it is the fact that not many fans of today remember how good his D was, and for Randolph it was the fact that he never won anything for his glove.

In my mind, because Randolph never won, that makes him more underrated for his D than Rose (who did win).

July 1, 2008  08:50 AM ET

Good luck Coach

July 1, 2008  09:01 AM ET

Greg Maddux lol

July 1, 2008  09:11 AM ET

Craig Biggio deserves a mention. He went from the hardest position (catcher) to the 3rd or 4th hardest (2nd) to the second hardest (CF) and back.

He had an above average fld % at each of them, yet we never really talk about him as a defensive player.

July 1, 2008  09:17 AM ET

I was thinking of Biggio but he won Gold Gloves....Randolph won 0.

July 1, 2008  09:18 AM ET

Ozzie Smith. That guy gets no love for his glove. All I ever hear about are his 28 homeruns, and his amazing .262 batting average. It gets nauseating.

July 1, 2008  09:25 AM ET

LOL

July 1, 2008  09:31 AM ET

Craig Biggio was too short, hence he doesnt play.

Thats physics.

July 1, 2008  09:48 AM ET

Legendary TD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

July 1, 2008  10:09 AM ET

Does Andruw Jones count as an underrated fielder? Everybody loved the guy defensively but he's in super elite company. I've read on a site that Andruw Jones was one of the top 3 defensive CFs ever using defensive metrics, on par with Willie Mays and Tris Speaker. That makes Jones a Hall of Fame candidate solely on his fielding ability. Add in 370+ homeruns and we're talking about a Hall of Fame resume. Of course with the rate Jones is declining, his career batting average might be in the low .250s which would bury him as a Hall of Fame candidate.

July 1, 2008  10:13 AM ET

chipper would make this cut over andruw

July 1, 2008  10:14 AM ET

I don't Andruw would qualify as underrated just because he is in the discussion of best fielders at his position ever.

July 1, 2008  10:22 AM ET

Tsuyoshi Shinjo was the greatest defensive center fielder of all times.

Out of ones that wore pink alot, anyway.

July 1, 2008  10:34 AM ET

That's true but I don't think anybody would say Jones is a Hall of Famer solely due to his defensive skills. If Jones is on Mays' level defensively, he can't be that far off from a Brooks or an Ozzie, two players that got in exclusively on their fielding ability alone.

July 1, 2008  10:45 AM ET

If defense only got you into the HOF, Mattingly and Garvey would be shoo ins....

July 1, 2008  10:46 AM ET

And just because you're not a HOFer that doesn't make you underrated.

And this TD is about underrated for their D, not HOF standing.

July 1, 2008  10:46 AM ET

Brooks Robinson's fielding was the driving force behind his entry, but his offense wasn't bad at all.

July 1, 2008  11:02 AM ET

Mattingly and Garvey didn't play at a premium defensive position like center field. I also think Mattingly should have gotten more Hall consideration considering the fact that Kirby Puckett got in on the first ballot.

July 1, 2008  11:11 AM ET

Good choices, will wait for arguments

July 1, 2008  11:13 AM ET

Mattingly and Garvey didn't play at a premium defensive position like center field. I also think Mattingly should have gotten more Hall consideration considering the fact that Kirby Puckett got in on the first ballot.
TradeAngelos | 07/01/08, 11:02 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Amen!

 
July 1, 2008  11:21 AM ET

How many of you know that Barry Bonds has EIGHT GOLD GLOVES? Yeah, I could hardly believe it, too.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Leaderboard

  Fan W L T Win %
1 DetroitFan* BS: Start Stanton! 132 9 7 91.6%
2 Porkins: Catches bullets 138 13 1 91.1%
3 Baun-ded=PUCKHEAD 52 5 1 90.5%
4 The Ram 138 17 4 88.1%
5 Foosball 68 9 2 87.3%
6 Philly-- www.sportsnoise.com 74 11 4 85.4%
7 Hyped78 113 19 5 84.3%
8 Dookie: Here We Go Steelers 117 19 8 84.0%
9 [The] Coach 97 18 5 82.9%
10 BSchwartz07 129 27 6 81.5%

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Jerry tries to pep up sulking T.O.
    Views
    9770
    Comments
    1132
  2. 2
    Plaxico shows no remorse
    Views
    3681
    Comments
    878
  3. 3
    Teixeira good fit for Yankees?
    Views
    9867
    Comments
    632
  4. 4
    Brewers considering run at Sabathia
    Views
    4377
    Comments
    508
  5. 5
    Burnett won't be on market long
    Views
    6708
    Comments
    151

Weekly Most Active Users

Comments + Blog Posts + Throwdowns

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Message Boards

  1. MMA > Fight Club

    Who will be the new 'face of…
    Views
    923
    Replies
    6
  2. NFL > General NFL

    Ed Hochuli needs to be FIRED!!
    Views
    361
    Replies
    22
  3. Fantasy > Football

    Get Maroney, give Edge...Do I…
    Views
    85
    Replies
    3

Blogs