FanNation - The Republic of Sport

The Prodigy is Hawaiian for #1 said 07/01, 01:56 PM
How come were not supposed to bring race into the discussion of sport? It seems ludicris to me that we are supposed to stay away from this topic. Let's look at some things that are about as close to fact as you can get in sport:
White Running Backs don't work anymore. Since the 80's can someone please name me a true white RB (NFL)that people feared or was more then barley effective. Yet we can't say that.
Modern White WR's are few and far between and still don't stack up to African American WR's.
Ditto for Corner Backs. Yet we can't say that
American Asians (so far) can't play RB. and I am Asian

We can't say that yes there was a thing called slavery (as deplorable as that is) we can't say that slave owners bred their slaves to be the biggest and strongest they could be, maximizing their investment. Sick? Yes however that is what occured.

So why can't we, it's America we should be able to talk about the issue of race in sports without being called racists names, or inciting a riot. I see nothing wrong with bringing race into the discussion if it is applicable.

Don't get me wrong there are some instances where race doesn't belong, but why shouldn't we talk about it.

The Prodigy is Hawaiian for #1 said 07/01, 02:17 PM
Let me shred your points real quick

First and foremost breeding works. As sick as their programs were the **** germans have mounds and mounds of data to support this. Certain traits i.e. physical prowess can be breed. And I agree its sick but its true. Ever wonder why smart people generally speaking have smart parents. because (and science has proved this) its a trait that can be passed on. L

Alstott was a Full Back, so sorry he don't count
Hines Ward is mixed and as you state a WR so he has no relevance to my argument.

John Lynch is a Safety not a true CB, just because he plays in the secondary doesn't make him a corner.

I never said people cannot rise above the hands they were dealt. Your examples about Black Head coaches winning a SB only validates my point that we should be allowed to discuss it. It was a ground breaking moment in sport. Hence we should recognize those two for being AA and going to the SB, not just being another coach to go. Or maybe we should just say MLK jr was just another human who fought for rights.

Genetic breeding is a proven scientifc fact:
http://www.biofact.com/cloning/

The Prodigy is Hawaiian for #1 said 07/01, 03:35 PM
It does make a difference. Certain GENES can be bred. Certain GENES can be changed depending on environment. Don't come at me like I don't know what I am talking about here, cause that would be a serious miscalculation on your part. OK fine since you threw that website under the bus how about these ones:
http://www.biopoliticaltimes.org/article.php?id=2037
http://www.aboutintelligence.co.uk/genetic-engineering-boost-intelligence.html


FB in modern football is not a RB. PERIOD. Different roles different posistions. This ain't the golden age of football anymore.

It makes a difference (the posistions played) Y? because premier posistions get more money from the team and from endorsements. When's the last time you saw a Olinemen get 31 mill for 2 years?

It is relevent, everyone knows its relevant, however no one can say it cause if you do you are a racist.

Also I think its important to note that in the future we will all be one color (beige) and we will all have the same genes. That's where we are headed, however until then this discussion should be allowed to occur in an intellegent fashion.

Unless of course you can't handle the discussion without getting firey