outlaw is East Bound and Down won the Throwdown.
Throwndowns: 162
Record: 88 - 65 - 9
Ball Ground, GA
All Throwdowns
5
Votes
Throwndowns: 71
Record: 61 - 9 - 1
I am Canadian!, XX
All Throwdowns
11
Votes

ATG tourney Final Outlaw vs. Foosball Best Pitcher in the 1970s


Good luck Foos

I am going with Jim Palmer of the Baltimore Orioles, he played the entire decade and put up stellar numbers going

186-103 with a 2.64 ERA, which was really just a dominating decade.

He also compiled eight 20 win seasons out of ten, that's 80% of a decade getting a 20 win season, most pitchers never see eight in a career much less a decade.

He had an amazing 175 complete games, which that averages to around 17 complete games per season over 10 years. And of those complete games 44 were shutouts, and thats a little over four complete games per season, he even got 10 shutouts in 1975, which is amazing.

He had 1559 strikeouts with only 861 walks which equals out to about a 2-1 k-BB ratio, which is decent, but K's are an overrated stat in my opinion.

More to come


I kind of figured Palmer would be your would pick... but the "Best Pitcher of the 70's & my pick is...

Tom Seaver

Seaver vs Palmer

2 Cy Youngs in the 70's (73,75)(3 career, 1 in 1969) vs 3 for Palmer (73, 75, 76)
178-101 vs 186-103 only 8 wins less
2.61 ERA vs 2.64
2304 K's Vs 1559 (K's are never an overrated stat)
165 CG vs 147
741 walks vs 861

But here is the real kicker. You need to look at the team behind him as well when you do the compare.

1970-76 Baltimore won 108, 101, 80, 97, 91, 90 & 88 games an avg of 94/season
1970-76 NY Mets won 83, 83, 83, 82, 71, 82, 86 games an avg of 81/season

And in Tom's Cy Young years of 73 & 75 the Mets won 82 games both seasons, barely a .500 team. Tom won 19 & 22 games in those 2 seasons.

Seaver didn't play for as great of a team as the Orioles in the 70's until he was traded to the Reds mid way thru the 77 season. And sure Palmer had 8 20 win seasons but Seaver won at least 18 games 5 times for the Mets during those 7 years with those Mets teams & hit 20 wins 4 times during the 70's.

BTW in 1992 Seaver was elected to the HOF with a vote of 98.8% (Highest ever for HOF vote)
Palmer went in 1990 & got 92.6%


You can look at the teams behind the player, but bottom line, Jim won more Cy Youngs, had more wins, and a better winning percentage, and eight count em eight 20 win seasons during a 10 year stretch is phenomenal.

The ERAs are basically the same
Ask Tom Glavine, or Greg Maddux, you don't have to be a strikeout pitcher to be a great pitcher.
Of the complete games, Palmer has a higher percentage of shutouts, Palper being 147-44, Seaver being 165-47

Anothe factor is Palmer was hurt during the 74 season, which limited him on some stats, and the same deal for 1979, which were the only two years he failed to win 20 games.

Palmer was also a 6 time All-Star during the 70s, and was a starter in 4 of them., Palmer won the Cy Young 3 times compared to 2 for Seaver, and Palmer was top 5 in the Cy Young race every year except for the twon that he was hurt in.

He was in the top 10 in MVP voting 3 years, which is great for a pitcher.

Palmer was also the TSN-AL Pitcher of the year for all of his Cy Young awards.

He was a four time Gold Glove winner(76-79)

He lead the league in ERA in 73 and 75, and was top 5 eight of the ten years.

Lead league in wins 3 times(75-77)

out of room.


"you don't have to be a strikeout pitcher to be a great pitcher."

True but you need a great defence & team behind u to help you get outs & score runs. If you don't have it then you have to do your part as a pitcher & get outs yourself by getting K's. And that is precisely my point.

The team behind Seaver was mediocre at best (a .500 team for the 7 seasons I mentioned), "The Mediocre Mets" (1 Pennant in 73). So he had to do it all by himself. Palmer had a great Orioles team behind him that averaged 94 wins a season (WS 70; AL Champs 70, 71, 79; AL East Champs 70, 71, 73, 74, 79). Including Gold Glover (6 straight 1970-75) Brooks Robinson at 3rd, Frank Robinson (70-71), Eddie Murray (77 ROY), Reggie Jackson (76), Don Baylor (70-75) etc.
Seaver had who? Ken Singleton, Rusty Staub & Dave Kingman. Hardly an All Star lineup.

Seaver also pitcher a No Hitter on June 16th, 1978 (Reds vs Cards)
Seaver was an 8 time all star in the 70's vs 6 for Palmer.
Seaver had tied the record for K's in a game with 19 in 1970 until it was broken by Clemens in 86 (while Seaver was on the team). He also got 10 K's in a row in that same game which is still a MLB record.


Palmer actually had a 2.58 ERA compared to Seavers 2.61(which is basically the same), but I miscalculated.

Palmer lead the league in innings pitched four times(70, 76, 77, 78), and was in the top ten four other times(the only he wasn't were the two year that he was hurt.

He can't help it he was on a good team, and his accomplishments should not be blemished by that fact, he would have still dominated with any other team.

He lead the league in ERA+ in 75 with a 169, and was in the top 5 a total of six times(including his #1 spot) and was top 10 two extra times, so for the lovers of ERA+ there you go.

But 3 Cy Youngs is more than any other pitcher in the 70s, and being in the top 5 7 times is pretty amazing as well.

Palmer was a much better fielder as well, winning 4 gold gloves to Seavers zero.

Both were great pitchers back in the day, but I give an edge to Palmer, his ERA was a smidge lower, had a better winning percentage, more wins, more 20 win seasons, more innings pitched, more complete games, a better ERA+, so as great as Seaver was in the 70s, Palmer was just a little bit later.


Seaver is also a member of the 300 win club with 311 and the 3000 strikeout club with 3640

Ok so ERA is basically a wash, wins are close. 2 Cy's to Palmers 3 even though Seaver won as well in 69 and was runner up in 71.

But Seaver blows Palmer away in K's and was more of a dominant pitcher in the 70's.
Also Seaver WHIP was 1.073 Palmer's 1.142.
Seaver's Strikeout to Walk ratio is 3.1 to 1..Palmer's is 1.8 to 1

But the fact of the mater is that Palmers success was partly contributed to the team behind him.
Look at the other Orioles pitchers that won 20 games during the 70's other than Palmer...

1970 - Mike Cuellar, Dave McNally
71 - Cuellar, McNally, Pat Dobson
74 - Cuellar
75 - Mike Torrez
76 - Wayne Garland
79 - Mike Flanagan

A lot of that is attributed to the Oriole Team itself that averaged 94 wins/season. Because, they wouldn't have been 20 game winners on any other team.

The Mets had 1 other 20 game winner other than Seaver
76-Jerry Koosman

So when you add it all up, it shows the sheer dominance of Seaver and he was clearly the Better Pitcher in the 70's over Palmer.

like the Palmer pick.....curious to who Foos will choose.

Report Offensive Comment

I have an idea, and if it's who I'm thinking of, then this will be a great TD.

Report Offensive Comment

I think Cy Young pitched until he was 70

Report Offensive Comment

stowe taught Cy Young's dad how to throw a curve ball.

Report Offensive Comment

There are only 2 pitchers Foos could legitimately pick....

Report Offensive Comment

There are only 2 pitchers Foos could legitimately pick....

rstowe - Older Emperor Today | 07/18/08, 12:25 PM

Seaver and Carlton are the other 2 that I thought of... is that who you were thinking Stowe?

Report Offensive Comment

And that's the better one...

Report Offensive Comment

Seaver and Carlton are the other 2 that I thought of... is that who you were thinking Stowe?

Foosball | 07/18/08, 12:38 PM


Yes, foos. Those the the two.

Report Offensive Comment

That's who I expected

Report Offensive Comment

an argument could be made for Carlton, and if you're a great arguer then maybe Catfish Hunter

Report Offensive Comment

Palmer had 175 complete games...where did the 147 number come from?

Report Offensive Comment

I added in my head, and I'm retarded.

Report Offensive Comment

or I typed wrong, apparently I can't even read my own argument.

Report Offensive Comment

actually it's what Foos said in his first argument

Report Offensive Comment

nice ones!!!! so far cant decide where to vote

Report Offensive Comment

actually it's what Foos said in his first argument

outlaw is Hank Williams III | 07/18/08, 01:19 PM


No...From 1970 to 1979, Palmer had 175 complete games. You were right. I don't know where 147 comes from.

Report Offensive Comment

SEAVER is the one who had 147 complete games.

That stat should read:

Palmer: 175
Seaver: 147

Report Offensive Comment

yes, I had it right, but then I looked at Foos's stats and he must have typed it wrong. I am just stupid and didn't check my first argument.

Report Offensive Comment

Foos had wrong stats then, b/c he had seaver as 165, and Palmer at 147, but it is my fault I typed it in wrong.

Report Offensive Comment
 

Also, Seaver had a 2.61 ERA in the 70s while Palmer had a 2.58. So THAT comparison should be:

Palmer: 2.58
Seaver: 2.61

Report Offensive Comment

Add a comment

Remember to keep it clean. Bad words will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed. More Guidelines


or cancel