FanNation - The Republic of Sport

wow I would really do this but I can't say they will improve I mean they are abotu a ten win team...nice idea though

Why thank you Prodigy!!!

I thought about saying: the same, and then I looked at the schedule

I'm thinking he only did 30 because the Pats can only go down (no push), and MIA won't go 1-15 or worse 2 years in a row. Nice TD idea.

6-10, maybe 7-9........Anderson may have been a surprise and might take a step back

NoBrowns Improve and win the North next year they go lets say 11-5 12-4

Donte Stallworth is not that good. Decline by a small amount or stay the same, IMO. They enjoyed a certain stealth ability, as nobody really believed they'd be any good. Now they are on the radar and people will be putting their all into gameplanning them.

David

When you get ready to do the Bucs, challenge Gruden............

No, challenge me..

I'm thinking he only did 30 because the Pats can only go down (no push), and MIA won't go 1-15 or worse 2 years in a row. Nice TD idea.

GIFF |

--- Actually Its the Pats and Panthers

I don;t want to have to argue with the LEGIONS of people here that will not belieive that the Mighty Panthers will NOT only win the SuperBowl with a MASSIVE 21-0 record (the NFL will give them a 2 win bonus for being awesome

The NHL will ALSO give them the stanley cup so they don;t invade Canada

I dunno they did make some nice adjustments to the D line, and although Stallworth isnt great, he makes for a nice distraction with that speed of his. Personally i doubt they win more then 10 at the same time i think 10 is attainable. I think they will have a very similar record to last season.

Not my TD, but at the moment, arent the Colts pretty full of injuries or players recovering from injuries?
Who's really expecting the Giants to be good this year honestly? (not that there isnt a chance)
Ravens are in rebuilding stages, that leaves DAL, JAX, and DEN.

Any who, good idea for TD

lol forgot PIT oh well good times

Gruden Again said 07/21, 03:39 PM
"Perhaps you simply misread what I said. Or you could have just intentionally ignored it to make your point. I was pretty clear that I was going to give you THREE reasons, the first of which was the addition of Donte."

He just argued what you gave him in your first argument. And he did so very effectively.

The Browns tough schedule will make it hard to win 10 games this year, let alone 11. I think they win 10 and make it as a wild card.

Hey, I got a vote. I'm happy.

And actually Ram, he did not argue what I gave him. I said I was going to give him three distinct reasons, and he replied "Donte Stallworth is THE reason they are going to improve". As I said, he ignored what I wrote. He didn't argue it effectively.

Especially given the fact that Stallworth is an improvement for the Browns. I mean honestly, how could a receiver not get off the bench with the Patriots and still have 700 yards playing with one of the best receivers in the game today and Wes Welker? Seems to me he fit in quite well there. Effective argument my tail.

Ah well. Since it is clear that Gruden votes based on whatever it is he thinks heading into the TD and not the arguments presented, I'll just vote for the TD Pimp since I think they'll decline.

Arguments shmarguments.

It was Charlie Frye, not Cleo Lemon

This TD was very mean spirited.

"sorry, thats like getting dumped By Amy Winehouse for being a crackhead"

Funniest thing I've read in days...

"Romeo DOES NOT call the defensive shots. That is a solid fact. But like I said, you made up the fact that he does, so I guess there's no disputing your made up information. "

Curious. If it's a "solid fact" then why not back up such a solid fact rather than just say you can't dispute his "made up information"?

"Solid Facts" are solid because they are verifiable. Yet you couldn't verify it. That leads me to believe the claim of "solid fact" was made up information...what a conundrum.