Views
242
Comments
45
  • November 04, 2009 04:15 PM ET

The Royals have the best outfielders in the A.L.

dr.ladiesman.sup@gmail.com (3-8-0) vs AM13 (5-13-0)
0
Votes
11
Votes
0
Votes
11
Votes


I think the Royals because what I will write below.

STARTING OUTFIELDERS

DeJesus
Crisp
Guillen

BACKUP OUTFIELDERS

Maier
Bloomquist
Anderson

TRIPLE A PLAYERS COULD HELP THE ROYALS OUT IF THEY BRING THEM UP.


My Pick: Boston Red Sox

Starting OF

LF: Jason Bay
CF: Jacoby Ellbury
RF: J.D Drew

Backups

Rocco Baldelli
Joey Gathright
Brian Anderson

Minors
Josh Reddick ( projected to be on opening day roster)
Ryan Kalish
Ryan Westmoreland

Comments (45) Add A Comment

November 4, 2009  04:17 PM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

0-3 here we go....

November 4, 2009  04:27 PM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

You can't be serious, I could probably pick over half of the MLB teams who have better OF.

November 4, 2009  04:29 PM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

I said the A.L.

You are a pervert.

Your picture are so unipropriate.

November 4, 2009  04:29 PM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

The Royals only have Crisp cause he wasn't good enough to crack Boston's three...

November 4, 2009  04:30 PM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

The yankees have to many out fielder so it dosent count.

November 4, 2009  04:30 PM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

I vote left. They must be the best if he said so.

November 4, 2009  04:31 PM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE
QUOTE(#5):
Originally posted 04:30 PM ET  11.04 by dr.ladiesman.sup@gmail.com

The yankees have to many out fielder so it dosent count.

Cause that makes sense. Judging by your argument, that infers that the Yankees have at least 7 OF seeing as you listed 6 for KC...

November 4, 2009  04:31 PM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

They are.

November 4, 2009  04:32 PM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

I hate when someone accepts your argument and dosent write a commit

November 4, 2009  04:33 PM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

Lol Crisp was a red sox reject.

November 4, 2009  04:33 PM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

How do you want to do this? I can argue that they are the most overpaid OF. Do you really want me to pick an AL OF and argue against theres?

November 4, 2009  04:33 PM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

Dumb

November 4, 2009  04:33 PM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE
QUOTE(#9):
Originally posted 04:32 PM ET  11.04 by dr.ladiesman.sup@gmail.com

I hate when someone accepts your argument and dosent write a commit

Does it matter? You are losing this TD regardless of his argument.

November 4, 2009  04:34 PM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

Its a bad sign when left lists six names and...

I don't even know the first name for three of them.
A fourth has an albatross contract that no other team is willing to take on.
A fifth is only there because he was unable to crack the top three of another AL team.

And yet somehow they are the best...

November 4, 2009  04:36 PM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

He shouldent. You cant vote for him because my record.

November 4, 2009  04:37 PM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE
QUOTE(#15):
Originally posted 04:36 PM ET  11.04 by dr.ladiesman.sup@gmail.com

He shouldent. You cant vote for him because my record.

Huh?

Right could take ten different teams and win this argument.

November 4, 2009  04:38 PM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

DeJesus is overrated due to being compared to the rest of the Royals roster.

Crisp was banged up and was another "lets turn this role player into a centerpiece" move for the team.

Guillen hasn't found his "talent" since he stopped doin' the dope.

As for the bench guys, I'd rather have the OF for the Bad News Bears starting.

Please left, while I appreciate the support, stop turning the knife more for the rest of your fellow Royals' fans.

November 4, 2009  04:38 PM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE
QUOTE(#15):
Originally posted 04:36 PM ET  11.04 by dr.ladiesman.sup@gmail.com

He shouldent. You cant vote for him because my record.

Do you know how to speak English?

Because the way you type shows you have no knowledge of the English language.

I mean I am usually not a stickler for grammar and spelling but your comments are ridiculous.

November 4, 2009  04:39 PM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

In Crisps defense he not only had to play center field in Boston but also all of left field and a little of right field.

 
November 4, 2009  04:42 PM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE
QUOTE(#19):
Originally posted 04:39 PM ET  11.04 by Michael Scott

In Crisps defense he not only had to play center field in Boston but also all of left field and a little of right field.

Not really.

Besides, it was never his fielding that was a problem... that was always exceptional. It was his hitting or lack thereof...

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Leaderboard

  Fan W L T Win %
1 YODA 51 3 2 92.9%
2 Hyped78 190 19 4 90.1%
3 FoosBall 118 12 3 89.8%
4 [The] Coach 130 21 7 84.5%
5 Southern Discomfort 42 7 3 83.7%
6 Argos: Lets Go Packers! 49 8 4 83.6%
7 BBK - Now it's all football 52 9 6 82.1%
8 BSchwar... 128 27 6 81.4%
9 BobbyOr... 45 10 3 80.2%
10 rstowe 315 79 20 78.5%

The Si.com Cover Hub Go to the Cover Hub

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    McDaniels takes jab at NFL Network
    Views
    15287
    Comments
    1386
  2. 2
    Sources: Big Ben having second thoughts
    Views
    5761
    Comments
    899
  3. 3
    Report: Halladay would welcome Yankees trade
    Views
    18845
    Comments
    452
  4. 4
    Who's Red Sox shortstop now?
    Views
    25906
    Comments
    203
  5. 5
    Giants DE takes it out on teammates
    Views
    49476
    Comments
    131

Most Active Users

Comments + Blog Posts + Throwdowns

  1. 1
    Chico 2.0
  2. 2
    BBK - Now it's all football
  3. 3
    rstowe
  4. 4
    gigi_iv
  5. 5
    Never NDing Struggle

Message Boards

  1. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    Your team sucks
    Views
    723
    Replies
    34

  2. NFL > Pittsburgh Steelers

    STEELERS VS RAVENS …
    Views
    224
    Replies
    45

  3. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    CFB Game Day 11/28/2009
    Views
    187
    Replies
    36

Blogs