Throwdowns > Completed

Views
7
Comments
35
  • September 22, 2007 09:10 PM ET

Start an MLB team with 1 pitcher and 1 fielder

8
Votes
8
Votes
8
Votes
8
Votes


I am going to go with Fausto Carmona and Hanley Ramirez

My pick for pitcher is Fausto Carmona is young and is underrated. He has 18 wins and a 3.03 ERA with 133 strikeouts and a 1.22 WHIP. He is a great young pitcher and he can give me good numbers for years to come. He only has 61 walks and 8 losses. That is really good for a kid his age. He isn???t in his prime yet and he is 2 wins from the major league lead!!!! That is really good.

My pick for a fielder is Hanley Ramirez. He can hit, run, and play defense. He is very young so he will have a lot of years to show off all of his talent and he will only get better so that help even more.

Here are his stats: 202 hits, 45 doubles, 6 triples, 28 homers, 78 RBI, 343 total bases, 50 for 64 in stolen base attempts, .390 OBP, .567 slugging %, .334 BA. He has 216 putouts, 368 assists, 22 errors, 95 double plays.

He is really young and he has good hitting stats. Plus he is good fielding wise.

Those are the people I picked.


I'm gonna take Carmona's NL Central counterpart Justin Verlander and Colorado Rockies' shortstop Troy Tulowitzki.

After winning AL Rookie of the Year last year, Verlander improved in innings pitched, strikeouts, and WHIP. He's already matched his win total and has three less losses in as many games as last year. He's definitely much improved and will only get better.


Troy Tulowitzki is a complete player and will be, in 1-2 years, the best shortstop in the National League. This year, he's batting .292 with 20 homers and 90 batted in and boasts an .837 OPS. His defense also beats the absolute hell out of Ramirez's and he should win the Gold Glove this year. If he doesn't, it just shows (again) how wrong the stystem is.

Ramirez is a great hitter but his bad fielding (ten points behind league average and 22 errors) at arguably the most important position on the field holds him back in my eyes. Tulowitzki's got the hitting, which will improve, and the excellent fielding.


Fausto Carmona is better than Justin Verlander. Fausto Carmona has better stats than Verlander also.

Carmona: 18-8, 3.03 ERA, 133 strikeouts, 1.22 WHIP, 31 games, 2 complete games, 1 shutout, 208.0 IP

Verlander: 18-6, 3.68ERA, 176 strikeouts, 1.24 WHIP, 31 games, 1 complete game, 1 shutout, 195.2 IP

Record-Verlander
ERA-Carmona
Strikeouts-Verlander
WHIP-Carmona
Games-Tied
Complete games-Carmona
Shutouts-Tied
Innings pitched-Carmona

Verlander-2
Carmona-4
Both-2

That looks like Carmona is better. Better WHIP, better ERA. They have the same wins but since Carmona has more innings pitched, that means that he has less no decisions.

Troy Tulowitzki has been good but Hanley Ramirez gets more hits so that means that he can get on and he has more speed to get more stolen bases to get into scoring position.


Yes Carmona has the edge in those categories but the only one that has "significant" space is ERA. Also, your less no decisions argument helps my cause more as it shows that Verlander should have more wins. There really is no glaring difference between the two and one could easily make the argument that Verlander will be more sucessful later in his career beacause this year is an improvement on last year and seems much less flukish than Carmona's year.

Yes, Ramirez has an edge in offense but shortstop is the most important position on the field in terms of defense. He has 23 errors! TWENTY THREE! His fielding percentage is .964! You or I could do better at shortstop! That is a full ten points below league average for his park. Compare that to Tulo who has a .986 FP which is absolutely outstanding for a shortstop. He has less than half of the errors of Ramirez. Ramirez's defense has hurt his team like crazy while Tulowitzki's has only helped, as he is leading all NL shortstops in fielding win shares. One could definitely make the argument that if there were negative win shares, Ramirez's horrible fielding would give him many a negative win share.


My less no decisions helps me too because Carmona would also have more wins. And we don???t have negative win shares so screw that idea. Ramirez has more doubles and has more homers with a better batting average. He hits the ball better than Tulowitzki and he also has more homers than him and Tulowitzki plays in COLORADO!!!!! That is a huge hitters park and the balls fly out of that park. Ramirez is a better hitter so I would take hitting over just a little bit of a fielding problem. 23 errors isn???t a big deal if you can really hit.


Let's not act like Dolphins' Stadium is a pitcher friendly park here, buddy. Ramirez gets alot of help from playing there, just like Tulo gets help from playing where he does. 23 errors does matter and is much more than a "little fielding problem", especially at the most important position in the field. Hitting isn't the only part of the game, which many seem to forget these days. and until his fielding comes around, Hanley Ramirez is not a complete player. With good hitting and excellent fielding, Tulowitzki already is a complete player. He should win the GG this year and will be the best SS in baseball in a few years time.

I like Hanley a lot and he's a great hitter but that's all he is--a great hitter. If I were starting a team, I would not want someone like that playing the most important position on the field.

September 22, 2007  09:12 PM ET

I would have picked the same, probably.

September 22, 2007  09:12 PM ET

ahhhh.. sooo close

i would have went with alex rodriguez and Erik bedard

September 22, 2007  09:14 PM ET

A-Rod isn't too young. Bedard isn't as good as Carmona...

September 22, 2007  09:20 PM ET

Arod puts butts in the seats and Erik is gonna be lights out next year

September 22, 2007  09:34 PM ET

Yeah, but with A-Rod on your team, you've got the probability of him breaking Bonds' home run record, so even if he is old, you're looking at a nice stretch of attendance and national media attention.

September 22, 2007  09:35 PM ET

I am going to go watch the Badgers game. I will get back to you tomarrow.

September 22, 2007  09:35 PM ET

oh alright. well, on Wisconsin!

September 22, 2007  09:36 PM ET

Verlander plays in the AL Central not NL.

September 22, 2007  09:37 PM ET

oh, woops. i guess i had Tulo in mind!

September 22, 2007  09:37 PM ET

GO BADGERS!!!!

September 22, 2007  09:39 PM ET

i don't get it here and i don't know why. it's making me mad. since UConn's team isn't worth rooting for and one of my good friends goes to UW, i've more or less adopted the Badgers as my NCAAF team.

September 22, 2007  09:40 PM ET

I would take Carlos Zambrano, I really don't think any other options would work in place of him. And for my hitter.....I'll take Miguel Cabrera. He is one of the most complete hitters in the game, although his D is not much.

September 22, 2007  09:43 PM ET

i was thinking Cabrera becuase he'll just move to DH later on but Tulo is going to be the best SS in the NL in the next year or two. i'm gonna lose this because his hitting numbers aren't as good (yet) as Ramirez's but his fielding beats the piss out of Hanley's.

September 22, 2007  09:50 PM ET

Hanley got my vote.

September 22, 2007  09:50 PM ET

lol, i'm gonna get shut out. i should just forefit before it gets too bad.

September 22, 2007  09:56 PM ET

sigh...this'll be like 54565 to nothing by the time he gets back tomorrow. people seem to forget that fielding is a really important part of the game and Ramirez's (god awful) fielding makes him and incomplete SS.

September 22, 2007  10:00 PM ET

coletrain, i'm breaking my own rule and voting for myself so i can get at least a moral victory.

September 22, 2007  10:38 PM ET

You said that SS is the most important position on the field, which I agree with, but what do you think is the second most important?

September 22, 2007  10:39 PM ET

Ramirez has not improved his fielding, its getting worse as a matter of fact. I want the complete player, TULOOOOO

 
September 22, 2007  10:44 PM ET

that's a good question, PeavyFan. i'n not quite sure. you could make a good case for catcher. a lot of people, myself included, believe that if you want to build a franchise, you buld "up the middle" with a good C, SS, and CF. if i could somehow do it, i'd start with Mauer or Martin, Tulo, and Sizemore.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Leaderboard

  Fan W L T Win %
1 DetroitFan* BS: Start Stanton! 132 9 7 91.6%
2 Porkins: Catches bullets 138 13 1 91.1%
3 Baun-ded=PUCKHEAD 52 5 1 90.5%
4 The Ram 138 17 4 88.1%
5 Foosball 68 9 2 87.3%
6 Philly-- www.sportsnoise.com 74 11 4 85.4%
7 Hyped78 113 19 5 84.3%
8 Dookie: Here We Go Steelers 117 19 8 84.0%
9 [The] Coach 97 18 5 82.9%
10 BSchwartz07 129 27 6 81.5%

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Plaxico shows no remorse
    Views
    4056
    Comments
    887
  2. 2
    Teixeira good fit for Yankees?
    Views
    11535
    Comments
    639
  3. 3
    Burnett won't be on market long
    Views
    7759
    Comments
    151
  4. 4
    Warner hasn't ruled out retirement
    Views
    4045
    Comments
    58
  5. 5
    Bengals coach on hot seat?
    Views
    4916
    Comments
    49

Weekly Most Active Users

Comments + Blog Posts + Throwdowns

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Message Boards

  1. MMA > Fight Club

    Who will be the new 'face of…
    Views
    1099
    Replies
    10
  2. NFL > General NFL

    Ed Hochuli needs to be FIRED!!
    Views
    420
    Replies
    24
  3. NFL > General NFL

    Taking bids for a new team!!!
    Views
    26
    Replies
    2

Blogs