- Views
- 765
- Comments
- 39
- 06/21/2011, 07:45PM ET
(KMac) Lame Sauce said 06/22, 08:19 PM
The question is: Is it better to have 1 superstar with a terribly selfish attitude surrounded by good/decent players, or a number of good players with team first attitudes?
This choice was easy for me to make. History has shown us that teams with good players with team first attitudes usually win the World Series. Proof?
2010 Giants
2008 Phillies
2006 Cardinals
2003 Marlins
and my favorite example....
THE 2002 ANAHEIM ANGELS.
Why the Angels? Not because of homerism (ok partly), but because they didn't have any superstars on their team. They had a team full of good, quality players with team first attitudes led by veterans Tim Salmon, Troy Percival, Darin Erstad, and Garret Anderson.
The team they played? How much more selfish can a team get when it already has Jeff Kent and Barry Bonds? Did either of them win a World Series? No.
Thus, the history books have proven that teams with selfish players don't win very often. They do win sometimes (see Red Sox and Yankees) but that's because they have more than one superstar on the team.
Bring the pain, BringThePain.
BringThePain said 06/23, 11:50 AM
First off, I got effed on this topic. Who in their right mind would take 1 SELFISH superstar over an actual team. But you have to play the hand you are dealt since this is a tourney TD.
My perfect example of THE ultimate selfish superstar is the one and only Manny Ramirez. Its funny how being great (Hanley Ramirez) will get the fact that your a waste of oxygen as a person overlooked.
This is the lineup for the 04' Red Sox the year they won the World Series.(baseball-referance.com)
C- Jason Varitek
1B- Kevin Millar
2B- Mark Bellhorn
SS- Pokey Reese
3B- Bill Mueller
LF- MANNY RAMIREZ
CF-Johnny Damon
RF- Gabe Kapler
DH- David Ortiz
Now although the pithching staff has some all time greats, this is not a lineup that anyone would EVER think would sweep a World Series. Manny Ramirez is the only great superstar in that lineup and dont say Ortix is. Although he is a very good player, he is a DH and not near as important as Manny, who was also named the World sereis MVP.
BRING THE PAIN!!!
(KMac) Lame Sauce said 06/24, 06:03 AM
Yes, the 2004 Red Sox had Manny Ramirez who is the epitome of THE ultimate selfish superstar, BUT you are incorrect to say that Ortiz was not near as important as Manny.
Quickly, I will prove this:
David Ortiz- 4.3 WAR
Manny Ramirez- 3.8 WAR
Why is Man-Ram's lower? Because there's not 2 DH spots on the team, and they had to put him somewhere. His RDRS was -11. Not good.
Anyways, in every sport, the team with the good players that play well together and are hell bent at winning usually win.
I'm not saying teams like the 2004 Red Sox can't pull it off, but they usually don't.
Let's look at the Giants last year.
Cody Ross? Brian Wilson? Somebody different stepped up and helped the team win every night, while the Rangers relied heavily on the bats of Nelson Cruz and Josh Hamilton to win. Once Hamilton's bat went cold, not many other players were used to contributing much, so the team went down. Meanwhile, San Fran being used to contributions from EVERY player went on to win the Series.
Just another example of a team without selfish superstars won.
BringThePain said 06/24, 01:14 PM
I hate to do this because im not a quitter, but I cant argue this topic. Its insane to even ask the question what is better.
Nobody wins with 1 superstar, much less 1 selfish superstar.
We need a new topic if you want to TD.
Leaderboard
| Fan | W | L | T | Win % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | (Un) | 101 | 18 | 8 | 82.7% |
| 2 | Darth Maim | 80 | 20 | 6 | 78.3% |
| 3 | DO_WORK... | 76 | 30 | 13 | 69.3% |
| 4 | :CubanM... | 63 | 27 | 7 | 68.6% |
| 5 | Olderth... | 86 | 35 | 17 | 68.5% |
| 6 | JimJ77 Can't make it up | 130 | 53 | 26 | 68.4% |
| 7 | Marlins Fan | 150 | 66 | 33 | 66.9% |
| 8 | HOOTZ | 31 | 14 | 11 | 65.2% |
| 9 | Argos. | 177 | 103 | 27 | 62.1% |
| 10 | Schad - Notorious Deadbeat | 71 | 43 | 9 | 61.4% |
Truth & Rumors
MOST POPULAR
-
1
LeBron lacking key champion component
- Views
- 3416
- Comments
- 1379
-
2
Cavs coming up empty for top-pick deal
- Views
- 2263
- Comments
- 282
-
3
Youkilis headed in reverse
- Views
- 8942
- Comments
- 215
-
4
Yankees suddenly need ... A-Rod
- Views
- 9462
- Comments
- 159
-
5
Marchand accuses Shaw of eye-gouging
- Views
- 4629
- Comments
- 117
Most Active Users
Comments + Blog Posts + Throwdowns
Fantasy Plus
- Fantasy baseball Pitching Report: Bartolo Colon's monster year
- Fantasy baseball Injury Report: Tigers ailing as Sanchez, Avila hit DL
- Fantasy baseball Waiver Wire: Joyce's hitting lifted Rays
- Fantasy baseball Weekly Planner: The arrival of Myers and Wheeler
- Fantasy baseball Prospect Watch: Bogaerts, Sano coming up



Comments (38) Add A Comment
I'll get my argument up in a little bit. The topic is: Is it better to have 1 superstar with a terribly selfish attitude surrounded by good/decent players, or a number of good players with team first attitudes?
(KMac) Lame Sauce
Total Comments (1528)
Left already has the edge, teams with only one star with a selfish attitude never get anywhere. When you get to more then one superstars with selfish attitudes. Well you are either the Yanks, Sox, or Phillies
Hip Hip Jorge
Cooperstown, NY
Total Comments (137)
I would rather have ultiple superstars
rsp
Total Comments (2261)
hey, the only selfish guy on their team was Manny.
rsp
Total Comments (2261)
BRING IT!!!!
DJRoxalot
Total Comments (108428)
http://www.fannation.com/blogs/post/848065?new=true
Blog anyone
Hip Hip Jorge
Cooperstown, NY
Total Comments (137)
Youk, Manny, and Ortiz are the three. Two took roids to make themselves look better, one is Kevin Youk
Hip Hip Jorge
Cooperstown, NY
Total Comments (137)
see the yankees? why dont you tell me who the selfish superstar was on the 96 and 98 yankees, cuz i cant find one.
kook583
Hoboken , NJ
Total Comments (1365)
I was more talking about the 2009 team. But I'm sure I can find one one the 96-98 teams. How bout Daryll Strawberry? Or David Wells?
(KMac) Lame Sauce
Total Comments (1528)
are you serious? in 96 and 98 daryl strawberry was a part time player who was paid less than 1million a year in 96 and 98. david wells played on 98 team, and was FAR from a superstar and FAR from selfish. just because wells was outspoken with the media at times(most of which came well after 98), it doesnt mean he wasnt a great clubhouse player, not to mention competitor. if anything david wells was the kind of player who wouldnt tolerate selfishness in other teammates. try again.
kook583
Hoboken , NJ
Total Comments (1365)
Boo!
williewilliejuan
Total Comments (36216)
Derek Jeter. Now there's a selfish mofo.
(KMac) Lame Sauce
Total Comments (1528)
Derek Jeter, The Moose, Brett Gardner, Jorge Posada and Mariano Rivera are the only players on the Yankees that I like. I just can't stand ARod, there is a selfish mofo for you, Swisher and Cano are okay but not great
Hip Hip Jorge
Cooperstown, NY
Total Comments (137)
we are talking about 1998. try again.
kook583
Hoboken , NJ
Total Comments (1365)
terrible move to trade him for the actually selfish clemens.
AllStarz Ruinating…
Total Comments (19282)
Ha!
AllStarz Ruinating…
Total Comments (19282)
You don't like Ganderson?
AllStarz Ruinating…
Total Comments (19282)
how is Youk selfish?
Ortiz may have taken roids but that was his only fault. He's a great guy.
rsp
Total Comments (2261)
Shut up
rsp
Total Comments (2261)
Comment
Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.