Views
1119
Comments
50
  • 07/19/2011, 01:33PM ET

Outdoots Inc Tourney - Is commercial Fishing Good or Bad For Our Coastal Communities?

NEW NAME (28-19-3) vs Assassin: Simile Next year (71-125-29)
8
Votes
4
Votes
8
Votes
4
Votes


Commercial fishing is very good for our coastal communities. This type of fishing provides countless related jobs, from boat builders and bait suppliers, all the way to the folks who work at the local restaurants and markets that specialize in fresh seafood.

All told, commercial fishing brings $28 billion in seafood sales to the economy.

Another aspect we cannot ignore about commercial fishing is that most of these fishermen come from a long family history of fishing. It's not just work, it's a lifestyle and a heritage for these people.

Without commercial fishing the economies of many coastal communities would crumble.

Without commercial fishing, where would we get our wild seafood? Likely imported from other countries, ones that do not have as strict regulations or enforcement on overfishing - creating more undue strain on our oceans.

Or maybe Evil Multi-National Corporations will provide our fish through aquaculture.

Either way, the result would be negative.

Continued commercial fishing, using sustainable methods, is vital to a healthy coastal economy and integral to coastal community life.

GL


Not a bad argument, Kagan.

Commercial fishing is good for our coastal communities it gives jobs, money blah blah. It's a crappy job to say the least. Depends what kind of fishing you are doing but it can be a 24/7 365 days/year job.

You don't get paid for what you don't catch. No sick days, holidays, nothing. And it's not a job you can just pick up with ease. It takes years and years of skill to get where some fishers are today.

Commercial fishing is slowing killing North America's fish stock who are barely surviving in the first place. We can trade for all kinds of sea food and things that commercial fishing provides without killing the fish population. Scientists have found that many species of fish have been declining due to over fishing and the their population is declining at a rapid pace.

Trading/importing/exporting would still provide jobs for people. There needs to be a catch limit or weight to at least control the fishing and hang on to the population as long as we can.

SAVE THE FISH.


So we should just import all our seafood to solve the sustainability problem? Your solution likely would have the exact opposite effect.

From which countries are we going to buy the fish from? At least with fish taken from US waters, the fishermen must obey US laws, and therefore some amount of environmental oversight can be achieved. Fishermen can use such techniques as trolling and harpooning that limit the catch to only targeted species. Regulated fishing seasons can help depleted populations regain their viability. These methods, most already in place, control the fishing and help preserve the industry, however tenuous it may be at the moment.

Foreign fishers will use whatever gets the most fish in the cheapest possible way, thereby maximizing their profits. Gil-netting, shallow-set long lining, and trawling methods like bottom dredging will catch everything in their way indiscriminately and therefore have a much more adverse affect on aquatic ecosystems.

Importing provides jobs? Not to workers in coastal communities. Longshoremen in major port cities, maybe, but coastal fishers will be left to the unemployment rolls.

Save the Fish?

Yes!

Eat American Fish!


Commercial fishing is putting money and food on the table and making crappy jobs for people. But at what cost? The cost is the fish stock. The fish that live near the coastal communities, their homes.

The biggest problem with the commercial fishing in and near coastal communities is the over fishing that some fishing companies can do. Many different kinds of fish are in the "low population"ranks according to the NOVA website. That isn't good.

What happens when the "low population" fishes get over fished? The fishermen find a different kind of fish to make money off of. Sooner or later, that will become low populated.

See? It's a cycle. A death cycle non the less. As long as people eat fish, fishers will over fish and eventually kill off the fish around the coastal communities. Then where are we going to get our fish?!?! We trade for it. It's our (U.S's) only option.

Sooner or later Nemo and all his friends are going to be all fished out.

Something is just fishy about commercial fishing. Plain and simple.


Of course overfishing is a concern. But get your facts right.

According to the National Marine Fisheries Service, 77% of the 207 fish stocks in the US were not considered to be overfished. And their "sustainability index" for 230 species has been on the rise for 10 years now

According to the director of the Office of Sustainable Fisheries - part of the NOAA - overfishing has continued to decline as more fisheries have continued to rebuild, allowing sustainability in our resources as well as economic opportunity

In NE for example, stocks of Georges Bank Haddock and spiny dogfish have been rebuilt, and have resulted in increased revenues for fishermen for the first time in years

Some of the species considered "overfished" are not driven by overfishing at all. Natural population shifts and climate changes also can drive fish numbers down

Commercial fishing provides 1.9 million jobs in the US. Not all of them are "crappy" jobs either

Leaving fishing in the hands of foreigners? 70% of their stocks ARE exploited or depleted

American's science-based management of our fish stocks is proving to be the most superior method in the entire world

USA! USA! USA - Fish!


Overfishing is going to happen. There is no way around it.

As long as commercial fishing is in business fish will continue to die. Can we agree on that? Sooner or later fish will be depleted.

Commercial fishers aren't making money rain down from the heavens either. An average yearly pay for a fisher is 44k a year. Working close to 365 days a year and making 44k isn't worth it, nor do we need it.

Natural population and climate changes drive the fish away? What do the workers do then? They have to fish for other kinds of fish. The workers have a smaller population of fish. Which equals overfishing.

Why doesn't the US do what it usually does? Be selfish and take from other countries. Let's save our fish and take from others.

70% of foreign stocks are depleted due to overfishing! Which is going to happen to the US if we keep commercial fishing legal. Now, who wants that?

Good work Kagan!

Outdoots!

Comment #1 has been removed
July 19, 2011  03:25 PM ET
QUOTE(#1):

Excellent first argument.

Geez! Why don't you just vote for him?

Comment #3 has been removed
July 19, 2011  03:42 PM ET
QUOTE(#3):

SHUT UP!I don't vote in my own tournament!

Who cares?

Comment #5 has been removed
July 19, 2011  04:55 PM ET

Good first argument Assassin



Feel better now?

July 19, 2011  05:24 PM ET

Commercial fishing is bad for the fish(ha-ha).

July 19, 2011  05:57 PM ET

Didn't have Assassin pegged for a hippie type....

July 19, 2011  06:58 PM ET

Both are good first arguments, 1 is just better and more accurate! LOL

July 19, 2011  09:56 PM ET

Outdoots!

July 19, 2011  10:10 PM ET
QUOTE(#11):

Outdoots!

I suspected that all along.

Comment #13 has been removed
July 20, 2011  12:54 AM ET
QUOTE(#6):

Good first argument AssassinFeel better now?

<farts>

Now I do.

July 20, 2011  10:10 AM ET
QUOTE(#11):

Outdoots!

It took 8 1/2 hours for someone to say something about that...

Comment #16 has been removed
July 20, 2011  10:33 AM ET
QUOTE(#16):

I said it in the Funke group yesterday as soon as I saw this TD!

r is right next to t on the keyboard - It was an honest mistake!

Comment #18 has been removed
Comment #19 has been removed
Comment #20 has been removed
 
Comment #21 has been removed

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Leaderboard

  Fan W L T Win %
1 OJ Simpson 48 11 4 79.4%
2 Bloggers Needed 1094 336 89 75.0%
3 JimJ77 Can't make it up 130 53 26 68.4%
4 :CubanM... 62 27 7 68.2%
5 Marlins Fan 146 66 32 66.4%
6 J-Business 91 73 24 54.8%
7 ()0P()0... 926 1536 406 39.4%
8 Highway... 170 813 54 19.0%

The Si.com Cover Hub Go to the Cover Hub

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Howard considering five teams
    Views
    14217
    Comments
    1255
  2. 2
    Why A-Rod's unloading his dream home for $30M
    Views
    8517
    Comments
    527
  3. 3
    Why Tennessee's the problem in the SEC
    Views
    2151
    Comments
    137
  4. 4
    Unnamed Jet: Team through with Sanchez
    Views
    33827
    Comments
    92
  5. 5
    Toews coming unglued
    Views
    2299
    Comments
    61

Most Active Users

Comments + Blog Posts + Throwdowns

  1. 1
    Just Wolves
  2. 2
    Manny Rottstorm
  3. 3
    UnBiasedPerspective-ChaosRules
  4. 4
    Mickey Bad Arse
  5. 5
    Guns N Guitars

Blogs